Containing the Duality: Leadership in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process

  • Nimrod RoslerEmail author
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)


Peace process is characterized by a complex political and social context creating difficult challenges for societies previously engulfed by conflict and for those who lead them. This was the case when the official peace process—known as “the Oslo process”—started between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization on September 1993. The basic role of a political leader from a sociopsychological perspective is to assist society in coping with the challenges that it faces and to mobilize its members for the policy she/he is constructing. In the challenging circumstances of a peace process following an intractable conflict, as those created during the Oslo process, the role of the leader becomes even more prominent. A unique psychosocial role for a leader during a peace process is coping with duality which characterizes it. During the Oslo process, for example, both Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat had to assist their societies in coping with a complex dual reality, which included cooperation and signing agreements between the sides, acts of serious violence, continued building of settlements in the occupied territories, and agreement violations. Each of the leaders fulfilled this role using messages of different content but whose aim was similar—to create rhetorical containment. The aim of rhetorical containment—a concept which is proposed for the first time in this chapter—is to aid the public in moderating and processing the difficulties and the pain involved in the peace process and to accept the complex character of the process through the speeches of the leader.


Society Member Peace Process Public Speech Occupied Territory Palestinian Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arian, A. (1998). Opinion shift in Israel: Long-term patterns and the effects of security events. In D. Bar-Tal, D. Jacobson, & A. Klieman (Eds.), Security concerns: Insights from the Israeli experience (pp. 267–286). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1909). Rethorica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K., Mnookin, R., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Barriers to peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Bar‐Siman‐Tov, Y. (1997). Peace‐making with the Palestinians: Change and legitimacy. Israel Affairs, 3(3–4), 170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2009). Overcoming psychological barriers to peace making: The influence of mediating beliefs about losses. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions and behavior (pp. 431–448). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Social Policy Review, 4, 63–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bar-Tal, D., Landman, S., Magal, T., & Rosler, N. (2009, September). Societal-psychological dynamics of peace-making process—A conceptual framework. Paper presented at the small meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology about “Resolving societal conflicts and building peace: Socio-psychological dynamics”, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  13. Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  14. Brewer, J. D. (2010). Peace processes: A sociological approach. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen-Chen, S., Halperin, E., Porat, R., & Bar-Tal, D. (2014). The differential effects of hope and fear on information processing in intractable conflict. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 11–30.Google Scholar
  16. Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 262–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Darby, J., & Mac Ginty, R. (Eds.). (2000). The management of peace processes. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequence of struggle and negotiation. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, vol. 2 (5th ed., pp. 983–1023). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elcock, H. (2001). Political leadership. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzduff, M. (2002). Beyond violence: Conflict resolution process in Northern Ireland. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gormley-Heenan, C. (2007). Political leadership and the Northern Ireland peace process: Role, capacity and effect. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Grinberg, L. (2009). Politics and violence in Israel/Palestine: Democracy versus military rule. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Halperin, E. (2011). Emotional barriers to peace: Emotions and public opinion of Jewish Israelis about the peace process in the Middle East. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 17, 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hermann, M. G., & Gerard, C. (2009). The contribution of leadership to the movement from violence to incorporation. In B. W. Dayton & L. Kriesberg (Eds.), Conflict transformation and peacebuilding: Moving from violence to sustainable peace (pp. 30–44). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, B., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Hughes, J., Tam, T., et al. (2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup contact, forgiveness and trust. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 199–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hogg, A. (2007). Social psychology of leadership. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 716–733). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Höglund, K. (2008). Peace negotiations in the shadow of violence. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  30. Kelman, H. C. (1999). Transforming the relationship between former enemies: A social-psychological analysis. In R. L. Rothstein (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 193–206). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  31. Kellerman, B. (Ed.). (1986). Political leadership: A source book. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  32. Khalidi, R. (2006). The iron cage: The story of the Palestinian struggle for statehood. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kimmerling, B. (2008). Clash of identities: Explorations in Israeli and Palestinian societies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kimmerling, B., & Migdal, S. (1994). Palestinians: The making of a people. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kriesberg, L., & Dayton, B. W. (2012). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United Stated Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an Israeli and a Palestinian peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 515–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marcus, C. (2006). Change and conflict: Motivation, resistance and commitment. In M. Deutsch, P. Coleman, & E. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 436–454). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Porat, R., Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). The effect of sociopsychological barriers on the processing of new information about peace opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(1), 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosler, N. (2012). Political context, social challenges, and leadership: Rhetorical expressions of psycho-social roles of leaders in intractable conflict and its resolution process—the Israeli-Palestinian case. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  41. Rosler, N. (in press). Not as simple as that: How leaders faced the challenges of pursuing the peace process in Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology.Google Scholar
  42. Rosler, N., Cohen-Chen, S., & Halperin, E. (in press). The distinctive effects of empathy and hope in intractable conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution.Google Scholar
  43. Rouhana, N. (2011). Key issues in reconciliation: Challenging traditional assumptions on conflict resolution and power dynamics. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 291–314). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  44. Said, W. (2000). The end of the peace process: Oslo and after. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  45. Segal, H. (1989). Klein. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  46. Sharvit, K. (2014). How conflict begets conflict: Activation of the ethos of conflict in times of distress in a society involved in an intractable conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shikaki, K. (1999). The internal consequences of unstable peace: Psychological and political responses of the Palestinians. In R. Rothstein (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 29–65). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  48. Snow, A., & Benford, D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kreisi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research: From structure to action (pp. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  49. Stedman, J. (2000). Spoiler problems in peace processes. In P. C. Stern & D. Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 178–224). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zartman, I. (2000). Ripeness: The hurting stalemate and beyond. In P. Stern & D. Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 225–250). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation, Department of Public PolicyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations