Physics of Stocks and Flows in Action

  • Hassan Qudrat-UllahEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)


A fairly large number of energy policy models have been developed by using system dynamics approach over a period of about five decades. In this chapter, we present a snapshot view of some selected models to see how these stocks and flows-based models have contributed to the better understanding of various energy policy related issues. Specifically, we will describe: (i) the context and objective (i.e., who and why a model was developed), (ii) a brief overview of model structure (i.e., identification of its key structural elements), (iii) the validity of the model (i.e., how the validation, if any, of the model was conducted), and (iv) key insights and major policy implications.


Capital Asset Electricity Sector Thermal Generation Power Authority Flexible Supply 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barlas, Y. (1989). Multiple tests for validations of system dynamics type of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 42(1), 59–87.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. CBC. (2010). Conference Board of Canada. Energy intensity 2010. Accessed on May 2, 2013.
  3. CleanAA. (2012). Ontario electricity surplus: An Opportunity to Reduce Costs 2012. Accessed on January 15, 2013.
  4. Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. IFC Consulting. (2006). The electricity supply/demand gap and the role of efficiency and renewables in Ontario, 2006. Accessed December 01, 2012.
  6. Kilanc, P., & Or, I. (2008). A decision support tool for the analysis of pricing, investment and regulatory processes in a decentralized electricity market. Energy Policy, 36(8), 3036–3044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OPA. (2013). Ontario Power Generation. Energy efficiency 2013a. Accessed on July 10, 2013.
  8. Park, J., Ahn, N.-S., Yoon, Y.-B., Koh, K.-H., & Bunn, D. W. (2007). Investment incentives in the Korean Electricity Market. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5819–5828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pollution Probe. Accessed on December 01, 2012.
  10. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2004). Resources, pollution, and development of sustainable energy policies. In M. A. Quaddus, & M. A. B. Siddique (Eds.), A handbook of sustainable development planning: Studies in modelling and decision support. UK: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar
  11. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2005). MDESRAP: a model for understanding the dynamics of electricity supply, resources and pollution. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 23(1): 1–13. Google Scholar
  12. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2013). Understanding the dynamics of electricity generation capacity in Canada: A system dynamics approach. Energy, 59, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2014). Green power in Ontario: A dynamic model-based analysis. Energy, 77(1), 859–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2015). Independent power (or pollution) producers? Electricity reforms and IPPs in Pakistan. Energy, 83(1), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qudrat-Ullah, H., & BaekSeo, S. (2010). How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy, 38(5): 2216–224.Google Scholar
  16. Qudrat-Ullah, H., BaekSeo S., & Brian, M, (2012). Improving high variable-low volume operations: An exploration into the lean product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 57(1/2/3), 49–69.Google Scholar
  17. Qudrat-Ullah, H., & Davidsen, P. (2001). Understanding the dynamics of electricity supply, resources and pollution: Pakistan’s case. Energy, 26(6), 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ross, M. (2013). Environmental and economic consequences of Ontario’s Green Energy Act 2013. Ontario Prosperity Initiative. Fraser Institute. Accessed on July 15, 2013.
  19. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Stokes, C. (2013). The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy, 56, 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations