Modeling and Simulation in Service of Energy Policy: The Challenges

  • Hassan Qudrat-UllahEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)


Modeling and simulation have long and well served the actors and various decision makers in the domain of energy policy . Various modeling approaches and models have been applied to address a variety of energy policy related issues. However, the journey continues. This chapter provides an overview of these modeling approaches and models identifying their key challenges in the face of emerging issues. The identified energy policy modeling related issues include the characterization of energy systems as complex dynamic systems with numerous uncertainties , nonlinearities , time lags , and intertwined feedback loops .


Energy Policy Carbon Capture Electricity Price Distribute Energy Resource Energy System Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dyner, I., & Larsen, E. R. (2001). From planning to strategy in the electricity industry. Energy Policy, 29(13), 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eberhard, A., & Gratwick, K. (2007). From state to market and back again: Egypt’s experiment with independent power projects. Working Paper, Oct 2007. Accessed on January 8, 2015.
  3. Fishbone, L. G., & Abilock, H. (1981). MARKAL, A linear programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the BNL version. International Journal of Energy Research, 5, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foell, W. K. (1985). Energy planning in developing-countries. Energy Policy, 13, 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Howells, et al. (2011). OSeMOSYS: The open source energy modeling system: An introduction to its ethos, structure and development. Energy Policy, 39, 5850–5890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IAEA. (1993). Energy and Nuclear Power Planning study for Pakistan: 1993-2023. IAEA-TECDOC-1030, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Accessed on November 11, 2014.
  8. IEA. (2012). IEA report on sustainable energy for all. V2. Accessed on January 17, 2015.
  9. Islas, J., & Grande, G. (2007). Optimization of alternative options for SO2 emissions control in the Mexican electrical sector. Energy Policy, 35(9), 4495–4503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kydes, A. S., & Shah, S. H. (1997). The national energy modelling system: Policy analysis and forecasting at the US department of energy. In D. W. Bunn & E. R. Larsen (Eds.), Systems modelling for energy policy (pp. 9–30). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Larsen, R., & Arango, S. (2013). System dynamics and the process of electricity deregulation. In H. Qudrat-Ullah (Ed.), Energy policy modeling in the 21st century (pp. 17–30). NY, USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meier, P., & Mubayi, V. (1983). Modeling energy economic interactions in developing-countries: A linear-programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 13, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Munasinghe, M., & Meier, P. (1993). Energy policy analysis and modeling. Cambridge: England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Omu, A., Choudhary, C., & Boies, A. (2013). Distributed energy resource system optimization using mixed integer linear programming. Energy Policy, 61, 2490266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Praetorius, B., & Schumacher, K. (2009). Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: The role of carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 37, 5081–5093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang, P., Gerst, D., & Borsuk, E. (2013). Exploring energy and economics futures using agent-based modeling and scenario discovery. In H. Qudrat-Ullah (Ed.), Energy policy modeling in the 21st century (pp. 251–269). NY, USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wood, F. P., & Geinzer, J. C. (1997). The IDEAS model and its use in developing the US climate change action plan. In D. W. Bunn & E. R. Larsen (Eds.), Systems modelling for energy policy (pp. 31–46). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations