Advertisement

Cacao Diseases pp 137-177 | Cite as

Witches’ Broom Disease (Moniliophthora perniciosa): History and Biology

  • Harry C. Evans
Chapter

Abstract

The history of witches’ broom disease is cataloged with special reference to its socioeconomic and ecological impact on the countries and regions affected. In particular, focus is placed on the Brazilian States of Rondônia and Bahia and the disastrous political events that have shaped their histories. The changing taxonomic status of the fungal causal agent—especially, its current placement in the genus Moniliophthora and its relationship to M. roreri—is documented and discussed. Like the frosty pod rot pathogen, M. perniciosa is hemibiotrophic with well-defined parasitic and saprophytic phases: separated morphologically, physiologically, and genetically. The symptomatology is described and illustrated in cacao and its relatives in the Malvales, as well as in the plant orders in which other hosts of the pathogen have been confirmed (Malpighiales and Solanales). The occurrence of a nonpathogenic biotype in the Bignoniaceae (Lamiales) is discussed in relation to the evolution of the pathotypes from benign to malign endophytes of woody plants. The etiology of the disease remains a matter of conjecture and there is circumstantial evidence indicating that the fungus may have developed a symbiotic association with another microorganism to facilitate invasion and disrupt host physiology. The only infective spore is the sexual basidiospore produced in the basidioma (mushroom) and spores are forcibly released and air dispersed over considerable distances as the temperature falls and the humidity rises during the night. The full life cycle of the cacao pathogen is described and illustrated schematically, and compared to that of the nonpathogenic L-biotype on Bignoniaceae. Finally, the areas of research that need to be addressed are prioritized.

Keywords

Atlantic Rainforest Cacao Plantation Dikaryotic Mycelium Broom Disease Cushion Infection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Aime, M. C., & Phillips-Mora, W. (2005). The causal agent of witches’ broom and frosty pod rot of cacao (chocolate, Theobroma cacao) form a new lineage of Marasmiaceae. Mycologia, 97, 1012–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alger, K., & Caldas, M. (1994). The declining of the cocoa economy in the Atlantic forest of Southern Bahia, Brazil: Conservation attitudes of cocoa planters. The Environmentalist, 14, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andebrhan, T., Figueira, A., Yamada, A. A., Cascardo, J., & Furtek, D. B. (1999). Molecular fingerprinting suggests two primary outbreaks of witches’ broom disease (Crinipellis perniciosa) of Theobroma cacao in Bahia. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 105, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, R. E. D., Cope F. W., Holliday, P. C., Bartley, B. G., & Taylor, D. J. (1954). The Anglo-Colombian Cacao collecting expedition. Report on Cacao Research. Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, pp 8–29.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, R. E. D., & Crowdy, S. H. (1943). Studies in witches’ broom disease of cacao caused by Marsmius perniciosus Stahel. Part I. Introduction, symptoms and etiology. Memoirs of the Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 7, 1–27.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R. E. D., & Crowdy, S. H. (1944). Studies in witches’ broom disease of cacao (Marasmius perniciosus Stahel. Part II. Field studies and control methods. Memoirs of the Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 8, 1–28.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, R. E. D., Crowdy, S. H., & Thorold, C. A. (1941). Witches’ broom disease investigations. I: Seasonal variations in intensity of infection and their effect on control methods. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 18, 107–116.Google Scholar
  9. Baker, R. E. D., & Holliday, P. (1957). Witches’ broom disease of cacao (Marasmius perniciosus Stahel). Phytopathological Papers, 2, 1–42.Google Scholar
  10. Barreto, R. W., & Evans, H. C. (1996). Duas novas solanáceas selvagens hospedeiras de Crinipellis perniciosa em Minas Gerais: uma explicação alternativa para a chegada da vassoura de bruxa do cacao na Bahia? Fitopatologia Brasileira, 21, 348.Google Scholar
  11. Bartley, B. G. D. (2005). The genetic diversity of cacao and its utilization. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bastos, C. N. (1990). Patogenicidade e características do isolado de Crinipellis perniciosa procedente de Uruçuca, Bahia. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 15, 344–346.Google Scholar
  13. Bastos, C. N., Andebrahn, T., & Almeida, L. C. (1988). Comparação morfológica de isolados de Crinipellis perniciosa. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 13, 202–206.Google Scholar
  14. Bastos, C. N., & Andebrhan, T. (1986). Urucu (Bixa orellana): nova espécie hospedeira da vassoura-de-bruxa (Crinipellis perniciosa) do cacaueiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 11, 963–965.Google Scholar
  15. Bastos, C. N., & Evans, H. C. (1985). A new pathotype of Crinipellis perniciosa (witches’ broom disease) on solanaceous hosts. Plant Pathology, 34, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bastos, C. N., Evans, H. C., & Samson, R. A. (1981). A new hyperparasitic fungus, Cladobotryum amazonense, with potential for control of fungal pathogens of cocoa. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 77, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bastos, C. N., Fonseca, S. E. A., & Melo, W. F. (1998). Masagonia cf. sepium, cipó native da Amazônia Brasileira; hospedeiro de Crinipellis perniciosa. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 23, 504.Google Scholar
  18. Bastos, C. N., Silva, S. D. V. M., & Almeida, O. C. (1991). Ocorrência de vassoura-de-bruxa em solanácea silvestre na região produtora de cacau da Bahia. Agrotrópica, 3, 109–110.Google Scholar
  19. Bezerra, J. L., Almeida, O. C., & Silva, S. D. V. M. (1998). Hospedeiros colaterais de Crinipellis perniciosa na Bahia, Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 23, 228.Google Scholar
  20. Braz, N. G. R. (2011). Análise comparativa entre os biótipos C e S de Moniliophthora perniciosa na Bahia por morfometria, patogenicidade e análise multilocos. MSc Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilheus, BA, Brazil.Google Scholar
  21. Briton-Jones, H. R., & Cheesman, E. E. (1931). Witch broom control. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 8, 79–89.Google Scholar
  22. CABI. (2002). Crinipellis perniciosa (Distribution map of plant diseases 37). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Caldas, M. M., & Perz, S. (2013). Agro-terrorism? The causes and consequences of the appearance of witches’ broom disease in cocoa plantations of southern Bahia, Brazil. Geoforum, 47, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Charles, V. K. (1906). Occurrence of Lasiodiplodia on Theobroma cacao and Mangifera indica. The Journal of Mycology, 12, 145–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chase, M. W., & Reveal, J. L. (2009). A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheesman, E. E. (1944). Notes on the nomenclature, classification and possible relationships of cacao populations. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 21, 144–159.Google Scholar
  27. Cooke, R. (1977). The biology of symbiotic fungi. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Cronshaw, D. K., & Evans, H. C. (1978). Witches’ broom disease of cocoa (Crinipellis perniciosa) in Ecuador. II. Methods of infection. Annals of Applied Biology, 89, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crozier, J., Thomas, S. E., Aime, M. C., Evans, H. C., & Holmes, K. A. (2006). Molecular characterisation of fungal endophytic morphospecies isolated from stems and pods of Theobroma cacao. Plant Pathology, 55, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Arruda, M. C. C., Ferreira, M. A. S. V., Miller, R. N. G., Resende, M. L. V., & Felipe, M. S. S. (2003). Nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA variability in Crinipellis perniciosa from different geographic origins and hosts. Mycological Research, 107, 25–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Arruda, M. C. C., Sepulveda, G. F., Miller, R. N. G., Resende, M. L. V., Dianese, J. C., & Felipe, M. S. S. (2005). Crinipellis brasiliensis, a new species based on morphological and molecular data. Mycologia, 97, 1348–1361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delgado, J. C., & Cook, A. A. (1976). Nuclear condition of the basidia, basidiospores and mycelium of Marasmius perniciosus. Phytopathology, 66, 717–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dennis, R. W. G. (1951). Some Agaricaceae of Trinidad and Venezuela. Leucosporae: Part I. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 34, 411–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donald, P. F. (2004). Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural production systems. Conservation Biology, 18, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Espino, Z. D. (1989). Outbreaks and new records. Panama. Outbreak of cacao witches’ broom disease, Crinipellis pernicio[sus]. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 37, 97.Google Scholar
  36. Evans, H. C. (1977). The occurrence of pathotypes of Crinipellis perniciosa (Stahel) Singer in the tropical rainforest ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the sixth international cocoa research conference, Caracas, Venezuela (pp. 166–170). Lagos, Nigeria: Cocoa Producers’ Alliance.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, H. C. (1978). Witches’ disease of cocoa (Crinipellis perniciosa) in Ecuador. I. The fungus. Annals of Applied Biology, 89, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Evans, H. C. (1980). Pleomorphism in Crinipellis perniciosa, causal agent of witches’ broom disease of cocoa. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 74, 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans, H. C. (1981a). Witches’ broom disease - a case study. Cocoa Grower’s Bulletin, 32, 6–19.Google Scholar
  40. Evans, H. C. (1981b). Pod rot of cacao caused by Moniliophthora (Monilia) roreri. Phytopathological Papers, 24, 1–44.Google Scholar
  41. Evans, H. C. (2002). Invasive neotropical pathogens of tree crops. In R. Watling, J. C. Frankland, A. M. Ainsworth, S. Isaac, & C. H. Robinson (Eds.), Tropical mycology (Micromycetes, Vol. 2, pp. 83–112). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Evans, H. C. (2007). Cacao diseases – the trilogy revisited. Phytopathology, 97, 1640–1643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Evans, H. C., & Barreto, R. W. (1996). Crinipellis perniciosa: A much investigated but little understood fungus. Mycologist, 10, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans, H. C., & Bastos, C. N. (1980). Basidiospore germination as a means of assessing resistance to Crinipellis perniciosa (witches’ broom disease) in cocoa cultivars. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 74, 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Evans, H. C., Bezerra, J. L., & Barreto, R. W. (2013). Of mushrooms and chocolate trees: Aetiology and phylogeny of witches’ broom and frosty pod diseases of cacao. Plant Pathology, 62, 728–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Evans, H. C., Edwards, D. F., & Rodríguez, M. (1977). Research on cocoa diseases in Ecuador: Past and present. PANS, 23, 68–80.Google Scholar
  47. Evans, H. C., Holmes, K. A., Phillips, W., & Wilkinson, M. J. (2002). What’s in a name: Crinipellis, the final resting place for the frosty pod rot pathogen of cocoa? Mycologist, 16, 148–152.Google Scholar
  48. Evans, H. C., Holmes, K. A., & Thomas, S. E. (2003). Endophytes and mycoparasites associated with an indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri, in Ecuador and a preliminary assessment of their potential as biocontrol agents of cocoa diseases. Mycological Progress, 2, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Evans, H. C., & Prior, C. (1987). Cocoa pod diseases: causal agents and control. Outlook on Agriculture, 16, 35–41.Google Scholar
  50. Evans, H. C., & Solórzano, G. R. (1982). Witches’ broom disease: wrong experiment, right results. In: Proceedings, 8th international cocoa research conference, Cartagena, Colombia (pp. 415-418). Lagos, Nigeria: Cocoa Producers’ Alliance.Google Scholar
  51. Evans, H. C., Stalpers, J. A., Samson, R. A., & Benny, G. L. (1978). On the taxonomy of Monilia roreri, an important pathogen of Theobroma cacao in South America. Canadian Journal of Botany, 56, 2528–2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gonçalves, J. R. C. (1965). Theobroma grandiflorum (Spreng.) Schum. as a source of inoculum of witches’-broom disease of Theobroma cacao L. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 42, 261–263.Google Scholar
  53. Griffith, G. W. (1989). Population structure of the cocoa pathogen Crinipellis perniciosa. PhD Thesis. University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
  54. Griffith, G. W. (2004). Witches’ brooms and frosty pods: threats to world cacao production. Biologist, 51, 71–75.Google Scholar
  55. Griffith, G. W., Bravo-Velasquez, E., Wilson, F. J., Lewis, D. M., & Hedger, J. N. (1994). Autoecology and evolution of the witches’ broom pathogen (Crinipellis perniciosa) of cocoa. In J. P. Blakeman & B. Williamson (Eds.), Ecology of plant pathogens (pp. 245–267). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  56. Griffith, G. W., & Hedger, J. N. (1994a). The breeding biology of biotypes of the witches’ broom pathogen of cocoa, Crinipellis perniciosa. Heredity, 72, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Griffith, G. W., & Hedger, J. N. (1994b). Spatial distribution of mycelia of the liana (L-) biotype of the agaric Crinipellis perniciosa (Stahel) Singer in tropical forest. New Phytologist, 127, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Griffith, G. W., Nicholson, J., Nenninger, A., Birch, R. N., & Hedger, J. N. (2003). Witches’ brooms and frosty pods: Two major pathogens of cacao. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 41, 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hedger, J. N., Pickering, V., & Aragundi, J. (1987). Variability of populations of the witches’ broom disease of cocoa (Crinipellis perniciosa). Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 88, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hibbet, D. S., Bauer, R., Binder, M., Giachini, A. J., Hosaka, K., Justo, A., Larsson, E., Larsson, K. H., Lawrey, J. D., Miettinen, O., Nagy, L. G., Nilsson, R. H., Weiss, M., & Thorn, R. G. (2014). Agaricomycetes. In D. J. McLaughlin & J. W. Spatafora (Eds.), The Mycota VII Part A (pp. 373–429). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Holliday, P. (1952). Witches’ broom disease of cacao (Marasmius perniciosus Stahel). Colonial Report, 286, 1–8. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  62. Holliday, P. (1971). Some tropical plant pathogens of limited distribution. Review of Plant Pathology, 50, 337–348.Google Scholar
  63. Holmes, K. A., Schroers, H., Thomas, S. E., Evans, H. C., & Samuels, G. J. (2004). Taxonomy and biocontrol potential of a new species of Trichoderma from the Amazon basin of South America. Mycological Progress, 3, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Howard, A. (1901). Witch-broom of cacao. West Indian Bulletin, 2, 205.Google Scholar
  65. IOCC. (1984). Managing witches’ broom disease of cocoa. Report, International Office of Cocoa and Chocolate, Brussels, Belgium, 19 pp.Google Scholar
  66. Junior, P. (2006a). Terrorismo biológico.Veja 21 Junho 2006, 60–63.Google Scholar
  67. Junior, P. (2006b). A caça às bruxas. Veja 05 Julho 2006, 52–53.Google Scholar
  68. Kelly, P. L., Reeder, R., Rhodes, S., & Edwards, N. (2009). First confirmed report of witches’ broom caused by Moniliophthora perniciosa on cacao, Theobroma cacao, in Saint Lucia. Plant Pathology, 58, 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kirk, P. M., Cannon, P. F., Minter, D. W., & Stalpers, J. A. (2008). Dictionary of the fungi (10th ed.). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  70. Lana, T. G., Azevedo, J. L., Pomella, A. W. V., Monteiro, R. T. R., Silva, C. B., & Araujo, W. L. (2011). Endophytic and pathogenic isolates of the cacao fungal pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa (Tricholomataceae) are indistinguishable based on genetic and physiological traits. Genetics and Molecular Research, 10, 326–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lewis, D. H. (1973). Concepts in fungal nutrition and the origin of biotrophy. Biological Reviews, 48, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lopes, J. R. M., Luz, E. D. M. N., & Bezerra, J. L. (2001). Suscetibilidade do cupuaçuzeiro e outras espécies vegetais a isolados de Crinipellis perniciosa obtidos de quatro hospedeiros diferentes no sul da Bahia. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 26, 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Luttrell, E. S. (1974). Parasitism of fungi on vascular plants. Mycologia, 66, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Luz, E. D. M. N., Bezerra, J. L., Resende, M. L. V., & Oliveira, M. L. (1997). Cacau – controle de doenças. In F. X. R. Vale & L. Zambolin (Eds.), Controle das doenças de plantas (Grandes culturas, Vol. 2, pp. 611–649). Viçosa, MG, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.Google Scholar
  75. Marelli, J.-P., Maximova, S. N., Gramacho, K. P., Kang, S., & Guiltinan, M. J. (2009). Infection biology of Moniliophthora perniciosa on Theobroma cacao and alternate solanaceous hosts. Tropical Plant Biology, 2, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Márquez, L. M., Redman, R. S., Rodriguez, R. J., & Roossinck, M. J. (2007). A virus in a fungus in a plant: A three-way symbiosis required for thermotolerance. Science, 315, 513–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin, R., Gazis, R., Skaltas, D., Chaverri, P., & Hibbett, D. (2015). Unexpected diversity of basidiomycetous endophytes in sapwood and leaves of Hevea. Mycologia, 107, 284–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Massee, G. (1910). Diseases of cultivated plants and trees. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Meinhardt, L. W., Bellato, C. M., Rincones, J., Azevedo, R. A., Cascarado, J. C. M., & Pereira, G. A. G. (2006). In vitro production of biotrophic-like cultures of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom disease of Theobroma cacao. Current Microbiology, 52, 191–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Meinhardt, L. W., Rincones, J., Bailey, B. A., Aime, M. C., Griffith, G. W., Zhang, D., & Pereira, G. A. G. (2008). Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom disease of cacao: what’s new from this old foe? Molecular Plant Pathology, 9, 577–588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Money, N. P. (2007). The triumph of the fungi: A rotten history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Mueller, G. M. (1995). Rolf Singer, 1906–1994. Mycologia, 87, 144–147.Google Scholar
  83. Myers, J. G. (1930). Notes on wild cacao in Surinam and in British Guiana. Kew Bulletin, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  84. Nyfeller, R., Bayer, C., Alverson, W. S., Yen, A., Whitlock, B. A., Chase, M. W., & Baum, D. A. (2005). Phylogenetic analysis of the Malvadendrina clade (Malvaceae s.l.) based on plastid DNA sequences. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 5, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oses, R., Valenzuela, S., Freer, J., Sanfuentes, E., & Rodriguez, J. (2008). Fungal endophytes in xylem of healthy Chilean trees and their possible role in early wood decay. Fungal Diversity, 33, 77–86.Google Scholar
  86. Padwick, G. W. (1956). Losses caused by plant diseases in the Colonies. Phytopathological Papers, 1, 1–60.Google Scholar
  87. Pegler, D. N. (1978). Crinipellis perniciosa (Agaricales). Kew Bulletin, 32, 731–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pegus, J. E. (1972). Aspects of the host-parasite relationship in the Theobroma cacao L./Marasmius perniciosus Stahel disease complex. MSc Thesis, University of West Indies, Trinidad.Google Scholar
  89. Pereira, J. L., Almeida, L. C. C., & Santos, S. M. (1996). Witches’ broom disease of cocoa in Bahia: Attempts at eradication and containment. Crop Protection, 15, 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pereira, J. L., Barreto, R. W., & Bezerra, J. L. (1997). Distribuição de Crinipellis perniciosa em solanáceas selvagens no Sudeste do Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 22, 295.Google Scholar
  91. Pereira, J. L., Ram, A., Figueredo, J. M., & Almeida, L. C. C. (1989). Primeira ocorrêcia de vassoura-de-bruxa na principal região produtora de cacau de Brasil. Agrotrópica, 1, 79–81.Google Scholar
  92. Pereira, J. L., Ram, A., Figueredo, J. M., & Almeida, L. C. C. (1990). First occurrence of witches’ broom disease in the principal cocoa-growing region of Brazil. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 67, 188–189.Google Scholar
  93. Phillips-Mora, W., Aime, M. C., & Wilkinson, M. J. (2007). Biodiversity and biogeography of the cacao (Theobroma cacao) pathogen Moniliophthora roreri in South America. Plant Pathology, 56, 911–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Posnette, A. F. (1947). Use of seeds in insect transmission of some plant viruses. Nature, 159, 500–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pound, F. J. (1938). Cacao and witchbroom disease (Marasmius perniciosus) of South America. With notes on other species of Theobroma. Report on a Visit to Ecuador, the Amazon Valley and Colombia. Department of Agriculture, Trinidad and Tobago, 58 pp.Google Scholar
  96. Pound, F. J. (1943). Cacao and witches’ broom disease (Marasmius perniciosus). Report on a recent visit to the Amazon territory of Peru. Department of Agriculture, Trinidad and Tobago, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  97. Purdy, L. H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1996). Status of cacao witches’ broom: biology, epidemiology, and management. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 34, 573–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Resende, M. L. V., Junqueira, N. T. V., & Dianese, J. C. (1997). Crinipellis perniciosa causando vassoura-de-bruxa em lobeira (Solanum lycocarpum) no Distrito Federal e no Estado de Goiás. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 22, 301.Google Scholar
  99. Resende, M. L. V., Nojosa, G. B. A., Silva, L. H. C. P., Niella, G. R., Carvalho, G. A., Santiago, D. V. R., & Bezerra, J. L. (2000). Crinipellis perniciosa proveniente de um novo hospedeiro, Heteropterys acutifolia, e´ patogenico ao cacaueiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 25, 88–91.Google Scholar
  100. Rice, R., & Greenberg, R. (2000). Cacao cultivation and the conservation of biological diversity. Ambio, 29, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Ritzema Bos, J. (1900). Over Krulloten en hexenbezems in de cacaoboomen in Suriname en eenige opmerkingem over hexenbezems in’t algemeen. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten, 6, 65.Google Scholar
  102. Ritzema Bos, J. (1901). Over Krulloten en hexenbezems in de cacaoboomen in Suriname. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten, 11, 26–30.Google Scholar
  103. Rocha, H. M., & Wheeler, B. E. J. (1985). Factors influencing the production of basidiocarps and the deposition and germination of basidiospores of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal fungus of witches’ broom disease on cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Plant Pathology, 34, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rodriguez, R. J., White, J. F., Arnold, A. E., & Redman, R. S. (2009). Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist, 182, 314–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rolim, S. G., & Chiarello, A. G. (2004). Slow death of Atlantic forest trees in cocoa agroforestry in southeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 2679–2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rorer, J. B. (1910). The witch broom disease of cacao in Surinam. Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture, Trinidad and Tobago, 64, 3–8.Google Scholar
  107. Rorer, J. B. (1913). The Suriname witch-broom disease of cacao. Circular Department of Agriculture, Trinidad and Tobago, 10, 1–13.Google Scholar
  108. Rorer, J. B. (1918). Enfermedades y plagas del cacao en el Ecuador y metódos modernos apropriados al cultivo del cacao. Report presented to the President and members of the Agricultural Society of Ecuador. Translated by A Pachano: Quinta Normal, Ambato, Ecuador.Google Scholar
  109. Rorer, J. B. (1926). Ecuador cacao. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 3, 46–47. 68–69.Google Scholar
  110. Saatchi, S., Agosti, D., Alger, K., Delabie, J., & Musinsky, J. (2001). Examining fragmentation and loss of primary forest in the southern Bahian Atlantic forest of Brazil with radar imagery. Conservation Biology, 15, 867–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Samuels, G. J., Pardo-Schultheiss, R., Hebbar, K. P., Lumsden, R. D., Bastos, C. N., Costa, J. C., & Bezerra, J. L. (2000). Trichoderma stromaticum sp. nov., a parasite of the cacao witches’ broom. Mycological Research, 104, 760–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Silva, P. (1987). Cacau e lagartão ou vassoura-da-bruxa: registros efetuados por Alexandre Rodrigues Ferreira nos anos de 1785 a 1787 na Amazônia. Boletim Técnico 146, CEPLAC – Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, Itabuna, Bahia, Brazil, 21 pp.Google Scholar
  113. Silva, S. D. V. M., Gramacho, K. P., & Almeida, O. C. (1992). Solanum paniculatum hospedeiro de Crinipellis perniciosa na região sul da Bahia. Agrotrópica, 4, 17–20.Google Scholar
  114. Singer, R. (1942). A monographic study of the genera Crinipellis and Chaetocalathus. Lilloa, 8, 441–534.Google Scholar
  115. Singer, R. (1976). Flora Neotropica. Monograph 17, Marasmieae (Basidiomycetes – Tricholomataceae). Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  116. Singer, R. (1978). Taxonomy and biology of vassoura-de-bruxa (witches’ broom disease, Krulloten disease). Report, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Amazônicas, Manaus, Brazil, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  117. Singer, R. (1986). The Agaricales in modern taxonomy (4th ed.). Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific.Google Scholar
  118. Stahel, G. (1915). Marasmius perniciosus nov. spec. (Translated by AMW Laag). Bulletin Departement van den Landbouw in Suriname, 33, 5–26.Google Scholar
  119. Stahel, G. (1919). Bijdrage tot de kennis der krullotenziekte. Bulletin Departement van den Landbouw in Suriname, 39, 1–34.Google Scholar
  120. Stahel, G. (1924). Verslag over het jaar 1923. In: Nederlandsch-Indisch Landbouw-Syndicaat, 114. In: (1925) Review of Applied Mycology 4:723.Google Scholar
  121. Stahel, G. (1932). Contribution to the knowledge of witchbroom disease (Translated by BG Montserin). Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 9, 167–176.Google Scholar
  122. Stahel, G. (1945). The natural resources of Surinam. In F. Verdoorn (Ed.), Plants and plant science in Latin America. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica.Google Scholar
  123. Stell, F. (1928). Witch broom disease of cacao. Proceedings of the Agricultural Society of Trinidad and Tobago, 28, 375–377.Google Scholar
  124. Tarnowski, T. L. B. (2009). Using molecular analysis to investigate phylogenetic relationships in two tropical pathosystems: witches’ broom of cacao caused by Moniliopohthora perniciosa and mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum spp. PhD Thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  125. Thomas, S. E., Crozier, J., Aime, M. C., Evans, H. C., & Holmes, K. A. (2008). Molecular characterisation of fungal endophytic morphospecies associated with the indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri, in Ecuador. Mycological Research, 112, 852–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Thomazella, D. P. T., Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Oliveira, H. C., Saviani, E. E., Rincones, J., Toni, I. M., Reis, O., Garcia, O., Meinhardt, L. W., Salgado, I., & Pereira, G. A. G. (2012). The hemibiotrophic cacao pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa depends on a mitochondrial alternative oxidase for biotrophic development. New Phytologist, 194, 1025–1034.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Thorold, C. A. (1975). Diseases of cocoa. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  128. van Arsdel, E. P. (1967). The nocturnal diffusion and transport of spores. Phytopathology, 57, 1221–1229.Google Scholar
  129. van Hall, C. J. J. (1910). The “Krulloten” - disease in a wild growing cacao species (Theobroma speciosum Spreng). Agricultural Society of Trinidad and Tobago, 435, 1–3.Google Scholar
  130. van Hall, C. J. J. (1914). Cocoa. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  131. van Hall, C. J. J., & Drost, A. W. (1907). Les balais de sorcière du cacaoyer provoqués par Colletotrichum luxificum n. sp. Recueil des Travaux Botaniques Néerlandais, 4, 243–321.Google Scholar
  132. van Hall, C. J. J., & Drost, A. W. (1909). The witch-broom disease in Suriname, its cause and treatment (Translated by A Fredholm). Proceedings of the Agricultural Society of Trinidad and Tobago, 9, 475–562.Google Scholar
  133. Viana, C. A. C. (2001). Compatibilidade somática e patogenicidade de Crinipellis perniciosa. MSc Thesis, Universidade Federal de Lavras, MG, Brazil.Google Scholar
  134. Viera, J. T. (1942). Lagartão ou vassoura-de-bruxa. Tropical Agriculture Trinidad, 6, 348–349.Google Scholar
  135. Walters, D. R., & McRoberts, N. (2006). Plants and biotrophs: a potential role for cytokinins? Trends in Plant Science, 11, 581–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Walters, D. R., McRoberts, N., & Fitt, B. D. (2008). Are green islands red herrings? Significance of green islands. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 83, 79–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Went, F. A. F. C. (1904). Krulloten en versteende vruchten van de cacao in Suriname. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, 10, 3–40.Google Scholar
  138. Wheeler, B. E. J., & Mepsted, R. (1988). Pathogenic variability amongst isolates of Crinipellis perniciosa from cocoa (Theobroma cacao). Plant Pathology, 37, 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wheeler, B. E. J., & Suárez, C. (1993). The pathosystem. In S. A. Rudgard, A. C. Maddison, & T. Andebrhan (Eds.), Disease management in cocoa: Comparative epidemiology of witches' broom (pp. 9–20). London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yamada, M. M., Andebrhan, T., & Furtek, D. B. (1998). Genetic variability among isolates of Crinipellis perniciosa from solanaceous hosts and their relationship to isolates from Theobroma cacao. Agrotrópica, 10, 123–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAB International, E-UK CentreEgham, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations