Ornament Analysis with the Help of Screened Poisson Shape Fields

  • Sibel TariEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)


In this chapter, some thought-provoking application problems in Ornament Analysis are examined. Fields constructed via Screened Poisson Equation are used as intermediate level representations towards developing solutions. In the considered problems, the fields serve to a variety of purposes – i.e., to embed critical point detection process into a suitable morphological scale space, to regularise an ill-posed search problem, and finally to integrate features in a context – extending the visual functions of the Screened Poisson Equation based shape fields.


Background Pixel Creative Design Screen Parameter Original Drawing Embed Part 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I thank the reviewers for their meticulous reading and supportive feedback. The work reported in the second half of this chapter is partially funded by TUBITAK grants 112E208 and 114E204.


  1. 1.
    Attneave, F.: Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61 (3), 183–193 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergbauer, J., Tari, S.: Wimmelbild analysis with approximate curvature coding distance images. In: Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision (SSVM), pp. 489–500. Springer, Berlin/New York (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diebold, J., Tari, S., Cremers, D.: The role of diffusion in figure hunt. J. Math. Imaging Vis. (2015). doi:10.1007/s10851-014-0548-6MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottschald, K.: Ueber den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. Psychologische Forschung 8, 261–317 (1926)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keles, H.Y., Tari, S.: A robust method for scale independent detection of curvature-based criticalities and intersections in line drawings. Pattern Recognit. 48 (1), 140–155 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keles, H.Y., Ozkar, M., Tari, S.: Weighted shapes for embedding perceived wholes. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 39, 360–375 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stiny, G.: Shape: Talking About Seeing and Doing. MIT, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tari, S.: Fluctuating distance fields, parts, three-partite skeletons. In: Breuss, M., Bruckstein, A., Maragos, P. (eds.) Innovations for Shape Analysis. Mathematics and Visualization, pp. 439–466. Springer, Berlin/New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tari, S., Genctav, M.: From a non-local Ambrosio-Tortorelli phase field to a randomized part hierarchy tree. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 49 (1), 69–86 (2014)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tari, S., Shah, J.: Local symmetries of shapes in arbitrary dimension. In: ICCV, pp. 1123–1128 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tari, Z.S.G., Shah, J., Pien, H.: A computationally efficient shape analysis via level sets. In: Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, San Francisco, pp 234–243 (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tari, S., Shah, J., Pien, H.: Extraction of shape skeletons from grayscale images. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 66 (2), 133–146 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations