Advertisement

Who Wants to Go to Arizona? A Brief Survey of Criminalization of Immigration Law in the U.S. Context

  • Gabriel Haddad TeixeiraEmail author
Chapter
  • 910 Downloads

Abstract

The state of Arizona, dissatisfied with circumstances arising from U.S. immigration policy, sought to promote adjustments in U.S. immigration law through the issue of local regulations: Arizona Senate Bill 1070, House Bill 2162. These statutes pursue to combat illegal immigration and harden the criminalization of immigration law by criminalizing the immigrants and conducts related to illegal immigration as labor issues. In this scenario, the purpose of this article is to promote a brief debate about the legal adequacy of Arizona’s acts, as well as the validity of the factual arguments that fostered the editing of such acts. The relationship between immigration and crime also may be questioned. Thus, this article promotes a brief analysis of the relationship between immigration and crime within the context of the paradigm shift of criminology—the passage of the etiological paradigm to the paradigm of critical criminology—and the effects of risk society and actuarial methodology on the way of thinking the issues pertaining to immigration and its relationship to crime. Finally, it questions the validity of Arizona’s acts based on empirical results about crime collected in recent surveys.

Keywords

Arizona Senate Bill 1070 Criminology Crimmigration House Bill 2162 U.S. immigration policy 

References

  1. Andrade VRP (1995) Do paradigma etiológico ao paradigma da reação social: mudança e permanência de paradigmas criminológicos na ciência e no senso comum. BuscaLegis 30:24–36Google Scholar
  2. Anitua GI (2008) Histórias dos pensamentos criminológicos. Revan, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  3. Arizona (2010a) House Bill 2162. http://www.azleg.gov/DocumentsForBill.asp?Bill_Number=2162. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  4. Arizona (2010b) Senate Bill 1070. http://www.azleg.gov/DocumentsForBill.asp?Bill_Number=1070. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  5. Arizona et al (2010) Proposed response to motion for preliminary injunction attached. http://www.ncsl.org/documents/immig/2010ArizonaDismiss.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  6. Baratta A (1999) Criminologia crítica e crítica do direito penal: introdução à sociologia do direito penal. Revan, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  7. Batista VM (1955) Introdução crítica à criminologia brasileira. Revan, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck U (2010) Sociedade de Risco: rumo a uma outra modoernidade. 34, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards JR (2001) Legislation I: immigrantion. In: Ciment J (ed) Encyclopedia of American Immigration: Imigração – Estados Unidos. Sharpe Referenc, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  10. Giorgi A (2005) Tolerancia cero: estrategias y prácticas de la sociedade del control. Editorial, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelsen H (2000) Teoria geral do Direito e do Estado. Martins Fontes, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  12. Martinez Jr R, Lee MT (2000) On immigration and crime. In U.S. Departament of Justice. The nature of crime: continuity and change. https://www.ncjrs.gov/criminal_justice2000/vol1_2000.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  13. National Conference of State Legislatures (2012) Arizona’s immigration enforcement laws. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/immig/analysis-of-arizonas-immigration-law.aspx. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  14. Plascencia LFB (2001) State, country, and municipal legislation. In: Ciment J (ed) Encyclopedia of American Immigration: Imigração – Estados Unidos. Sharpe Reference, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  15. Recueil des Traités des Nations Unies (1966) Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques. http://treaties.un.org/pages/ShowMTDSGDetails.aspx?src=UNTSONLINE&tabid=2&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&lang=fr#Participants. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  16. Rumbaut RG, Ewing WA (2007) The myth of immigrant criminality and the paradox of assimilation: incarceration rates among native and foreign-born men. Spring, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Stand with Arizona (2012) About. https://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona/info. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  18. Statehealthfacts (2012) Arizona: population distribution by citizenship status, states. http://www.statehealthfacts.org/profileind.jsp?ind=3&cat=1&rgn=4. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  19. U.S. Census (2010) 2010 Census Results. http://www.census.gov/2010census/data/
  20. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (2012) Immigration and nationality act. http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  21. U.S. Department of Justice (2010) Prisoners in 2010. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/p10.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  22. U.S. Department of Justice (2012) Complaint. http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/az-complaint.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  23. U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (2010) Order – CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB. http://www.ncsl.org/documents/immig/2010Arizonaboltonruling.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  24. United States (1787) Constitution. http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  25. United States Supreme Court (2012) Petição n° 11–182 – 2012. www.nilc.org/document.html?id=632. Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  26. Vázques-Azpiri AJ (2001) Legislation II: immigrants in America. In: Ciment J (ed) Encyclopedia of American immigration. Sharpe Reference, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  27. Weissbrodt D, Danielson L (2005) Immigration law and procedure. Thomson, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  28. Young J (2002) A sociedade excludente: exclusão social, criminalidade e diferença na modernidade recente. Revan, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeman S (2001) Civil rights. In: Ciment J (ed) Encyclopedia of American immigration: Imigração – Estados Unidos. Sharpe Reference, United StatesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law DepartmentCentro Universitário de Brasília (UniCEUB)BrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations