Advertisement

Dynamic Humour Boundaries

  • Barbara Plester
Chapter

Abstract

Workplace humour and fun are bounded social activities. This chapter explores the role of boundaries that limit or constrain humour in the workplace. When discussing humour in their workplaces, people consistently use phrases such as ‘cross the line’ and ‘goes too far’ for humour that they believe is inappropriate or offensive in their work context – thus indicating that they perceive that a boundary exists. The boundaries are socially constructed by socialized employees and managers in workplaces and these boundaries reinforce both organizational and societal norms and propriety. Although not usually officially articulated and prescribed, organizational members know where these metaphorical boundaries lie. The boundaries are largely maintained by shared cultural understandings rather than formal policies and thus are dynamic and can be tested, pushed and exceeded but also can be firmly constrained. The dynamic nature of the humour boundaries means that they also change from situation to situation and operate fluidly as people move between formal serious meetings and more social workplace events such as parties and celebrations.

Formality is an important component of humour boundary construction that highly influences the types of humour that are considered acceptable in each organization. Workplace humour that may include elements such as high noise levels, physical humour enactments and jokes that are sexual, sexist, political and/or racist can transgress the perceived boundaries in organizations and this has resulted in most (overt) workplace humour being safe, sanitised and politically correct. When a transgression does occur, reactions and repercussions can be intense and cause emotional distress, dissonance and disharmony as well as a deliberate resetting of the humour boundary. Humour also has an impact on group boundaries and the final section of this chapter emphasizes how humour can define who is a member of either the in-group or the out-group and this highlights the importance of the role of humour in group dynamics.

Keywords

Boundary Social construction Organizational culture Fun In-groups Out-groups 

References

  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (2004). Social identity theory and the organization. In Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (Eds.). Organizational identity: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barsoux, J. (1996). Why organizations need humour. European Management Journal, 14(5), 500–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beetham, D. (1996). Bureaucracy (2nd ed.). Buckingham: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L. (1997). Redeeming laughter: The comic dimension of human experience. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule. Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, N. (2015). Joking aside: Theorizing laughter in organizations. Culture and Organization, 21(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, T. (1999). Jokes. Philosophical thoughts on joking matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collinson, D. L. (1988). Engineering humour: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations. Organization Studies, 9(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collinson, D. L. (1992). Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collinson, D. L. (2002). Managing humour. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, C. (2005). Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behaviour. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, C. (2008). Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations, 61(8), 1087–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, C. (1982). Ethnic jokes, moral values and social boundaries. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(3), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duncan, J. W., Smeltzer, L. R., & Leap, T. L. (1990). Humor and work: Applications of joking behaviour to management. Journal of Management, 16(2), 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dwyer, T. (1991). Humor, power, and change in organizations. Human Relations, 44(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fine, G. A., & De Soucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleming, P. (2005). Worker’s playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a ‘Culture of fun’ program. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleming, P. (2009). Authenticity and the cultural politics of work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handy, C. (1993). Understanding organizations. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Holmes, J. (2007). Humour and the construction of Maori leadership at work. Leadership, 3(1), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1683–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, W. (1989). Toward a sense of organizational humor: Implications for organizational diagnosis and change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1990). The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations, 43(8), 751–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linstead, S. (1985). Jokers wild: The importance of humour in the maintenance of organizational culture. Sociological Review, 13(3), 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morand, D. A. (1995). The role of behavioral formality and informality on the enactment of bureaucratic versus organic organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 831–872.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Morgan, G., Frost, P. J., & Pondy, L. R. (1983). Organizational symbolism. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 335–354). London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, M. (2000). Organizational culture and identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Paulsen, N., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2003). Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Plester, B. A. (2009). Crossing the line: Boundaries of workplace humour and fun. Employee Relations, 31(6), 584–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plester, B. A. (2015). 'Take it like a man!' Performing hegemonic masculinity through organizational humour. ephemera, 15(3), 537–559.Google Scholar
  34. Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3).Google Scholar
  35. Plester, B. A., & Orams, M. B. (2008). Send in the clowns: The role of the joker in three New Zealand IT companies. Humor: International Journal of Humour Research, 21(3), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plester, B. A., & Sayers, J. G. (2007). Taking the piss: The functions of banter in three IT companies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20(2), 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodrigues, S. B., & Collinson, D. L. (1995). ‘Having fun’? Humour as resistance in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16(5), 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romero, E. J. (2005). The effect of humor on mental state and work effort. Work, Organization and Emotion, 1(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Romero, E. J., & Pescosolido, A. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61(3), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy, D. (1959). ‘Banana Time’: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization Studies, 18, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schein, E. H. (1985/2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (2003). ‘Subterranean worksick blues’: Humour as subversion in two call centres. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1487–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Terrion, J. L., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 55–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warren, S., & Fineman, S. (2007). ‘Don’t get me wrong, it’s fun here, but…’ Ambivalence and paradox in a ‘fun’ work environment. In R. Westwood & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Humour, work and organization (pp. 92–112). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Plester
    • 1
  1. 1.Management & International BusinessUniversity of Auckland Business SchoolAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations