Abstract
In every workplace where I have undertaken research, I have identified a specific person (or persons) whom I call the joker. This person assumes the role of a humour specialist in an organization, department or work team and makes it their business to create humour (and fun) at work. They are usually skilled at knowing when, where and what types of humour to use in different situations. This chapter investigates the role of the joker and suggests that the modern organizational joker plays a similar role to that of the traditional court jester of mediaeval times. This role is voluntarily adopted by skilled humour-users but does have some repercussions for the jokers’ organizational advancement. Adopting the role of the joker gives this person the ability to push the humour boundaries a little further than other organizational members and they get away with humour that might be considered offensive if created or enacted by someone else. The joker can only assume this role if he or she is well-integrated with the group and understands the social practices and norms of the group. The chapter concludes by discussing the opposing role to the joker, that of the gatekeeper, who limits and constrains humour in order to maintain organizational propriety and professionalism. Gatekeepers may be self-appointed and the role may be assumed by long-term staff who try to mitigate issues. Alternatively gatekeepers are those with official organizational power and authority who feel a responsibility to ensure humour does not cross the line and cause offence or bring the organization into disrepute.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakhtin, M. (1965). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule. Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.
Burke, W. (2005). Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=20987012&site=bsi-live
Butler, N. (2015). Joking aside: Theorizing laughter in organizations. Culture and Organization, 21(1), 42–58.
Charles, L. H. (1945). The clown’s function. The Journal of American Folklore, 58(227), 25–34.
Danow, D. K. (1995). The spirit of carnival: Magical realism and the grotesque. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
Davidson, C. (1996). Fools and folly. Michigan: Western Michigan University Press.
Douglas, M. (1999). Implicit meanings. Selected essays in anthropology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Evans, R. C. (1996). Forgotten fools: Alexander Barclay’s Ship of Fools. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Fools and folly. Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Fine, G. A., & De Soucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1), 1–22.
Fisher, S., & Fisher, R. L. (1983). Personality and psychopathology in the comic. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (Vol. 2, pp. 41–60). New York: Springer.
Happe, P. (1996). Staging folly in the early sixteenth century: Heywood, Lindsay, and others. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Fools and folly (pp. 285–301). Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Hay, J. (1994). Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 26–55.
Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709–742.
Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Burns, L. (2001). Women’s humour in the workplace. A quantitative analysis. Australian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 83–108.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1990). The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations, 43(8), 751–770.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 2(1), 143–153.
Morrill, C., Buller, D. B., Buller, M., & Larkey, L. L. (1999). Toward an organizational perspective on identifying and managing formal gatekeepers. Qualitative Sociology, 22(1), 52–72.
Paulsen, N., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2003). Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Plester, B. A. (2008). Laugh out loud: How organizational culture influences workplace humour. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Massey University, Auckland.
Plester, B. A. (2009). Crossing the line: Boundaries of workplace humour and fun. Employee Relations, 31(6), 584–599.
Plester, B., & Carroll, B. (2014). Laugh lines: Transgressing the organization. Paper presented at International Society Humour Scholars conference, Utrecht, July 9, 2104.
Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3).
Plester, B. A., & Orams, M. B. (2008). Send in the clowns: The role of the joker in three New Zealand IT companies. Humor: International Journal of Humour Research, 21(3), 253–281.
Stuff News (2014). http://www.stuff.co.nz/. Dec 6, 2014.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plester, B. (2016). The Organization Joker: A Modern Court Jester. In: The Complexity of Workplace Humour. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24669-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24669-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24667-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24669-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)