Skip to main content

The Organization Joker: A Modern Court Jester

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Complexity of Workplace Humour
  • 1546 Accesses

Abstract

In every workplace where I have undertaken research, I have identified a specific person (or persons) whom I call the joker. This person assumes the role of a humour specialist in an organization, department or work team and makes it their business to create humour (and fun) at work. They are usually skilled at knowing when, where and what types of humour to use in different situations. This chapter investigates the role of the joker and suggests that the modern organizational joker plays a similar role to that of the traditional court jester of mediaeval times. This role is voluntarily adopted by skilled humour-users but does have some repercussions for the jokers’ organizational advancement. Adopting the role of the joker gives this person the ability to push the humour boundaries a little further than other organizational members and they get away with humour that might be considered offensive if created or enacted by someone else. The joker can only assume this role if he or she is well-integrated with the group and understands the social practices and norms of the group. The chapter concludes by discussing the opposing role to the joker, that of the gatekeeper, who limits and constrains humour in order to maintain organizational propriety and professionalism. Gatekeepers may be self-appointed and the role may be assumed by long-term staff who try to mitigate issues. Alternatively gatekeepers are those with official organizational power and authority who feel a responsibility to ensure humour does not cross the line and cause offence or bring the organization into disrepute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1965). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule. Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. (2005). Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=20987012&site=bsi-live

  • Butler, N. (2015). Joking aside: Theorizing laughter in organizations. Culture and Organization, 21(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, L. H. (1945). The clown’s function. The Journal of American Folklore, 58(227), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danow, D. K. (1995). The spirit of carnival: Magical realism and the grotesque. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C. (1996). Fools and folly. Michigan: Western Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1999). Implicit meanings. Selected essays in anthropology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. C. (1996). Forgotten fools: Alexander Barclay’s Ship of Fools. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Fools and folly. Michigan: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A., & De Soucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S., & Fisher, R. L. (1983). Personality and psychopathology in the comic. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (Vol. 2, pp. 41–60). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Happe, P. (1996). Staging folly in the early sixteenth century: Heywood, Lindsay, and others. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Fools and folly (pp. 285–301). Michigan: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. (1994). Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 26–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Burns, L. (2001). Women’s humour in the workplace. A quantitative analysis. Australian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1990). The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations, 43(8), 751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 2(1), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C., Buller, D. B., Buller, M., & Larkey, L. L. (1999). Toward an organizational perspective on identifying and managing formal gatekeepers. Qualitative Sociology, 22(1), 52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, N., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2003). Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B. A. (2008). Laugh out loud: How organizational culture influences workplace humour. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Massey University, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B. A. (2009). Crossing the line: Boundaries of workplace humour and fun. Employee Relations, 31(6), 584–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B., & Carroll, B. (2014). Laugh lines: Transgressing the organization. Paper presented at International Society Humour Scholars conference, Utrecht, July 9, 2104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester, B. A., & Orams, M. B. (2008). Send in the clowns: The role of the joker in three New Zealand IT companies. Humor: International Journal of Humour Research, 21(3), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuff News (2014). http://www.stuff.co.nz/. Dec 6, 2014.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plester, B. (2016). The Organization Joker: A Modern Court Jester. In: The Complexity of Workplace Humour. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24669-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics