Skip to main content

Measuring Quality in Metadata Repositories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL 2015)


The need for good quality metadata records becomes a necessity given the large quantities of digital content that is available through digital repositories and the increasing number of web services that use this content. The context in which metadata are generated and used affects the problem in question and therefore a flexible metadata quality evaluation model that can be easily and widely used has yet to be presented. This paper proposes a robust multidimensional metadata quality evaluation model that measures metadata quality based on five metrics and by taking into account contextual parameters concerning metadata generation and use. An implementation of this metadata quality evaluation model is presented and tested against a large number of real metadata records from the humanities domain and for different applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

    The results for all the datasets are available at


  1. Herzog, T., Scheuren, F., Winkler, W.: Data Quality and Record Linkage Techniques. Springer-Verlag, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tani, A., Candela, L., Castelli, D.: Dealing with metadata quality: the legacy of digital library efforts. Inf. Process. Manag. 49, 1194–1205 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moen, W.E., Stewart, E.L., McClure, C.R.: The Role of Content Analysis in Evaluating Metadata for the U.S. Government Information Locator Service (GILS): Results from an Exploratory Study (1997).

  4. Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A.: A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Singapore, pp. 104–113 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margaritopoulos, M., Margaritopoulos, T., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A.: Quantifying and measuring metadata completeness. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 63, 724–737 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellini, E., Nesi, P.: Metadata quality assessment tool for open access cultural heritage institutional repositories. In: Nesi, P., Santucci, R. (eds.) ECLAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7990, pp. 90–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce, T.R., Hillmann, D.I.: The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. In: Hillman, D., Westbrooks, E. (eds.) Metadata in practice. ALA Editions, Chicago (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Quality metrics for learning object metadata. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1004–1011 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C.: A framework for information quality assessment. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 58, 1720–1733 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shreeves, S.L., Knutson, E.M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C.L., Twidale, M.B., Cole, T.W.: Is “quality” metadata “shareable” metadata? the implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In: 12th National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), Minneapolis, pp. 223–237 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Y.-N., Wen, C.-Y., Chen, H.-P., Lin, Y.-H., Sum, H.-C.: Metrics for metadata quality assurance and their implications for digital libraries. In: Airong, J. (ed.) ICADL 2011. LNCS, vol. 7008, pp. 138–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lei, Y., Uren, V., Motta, E.: A framework for evaluating semantic metadata. In: 4th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, p. 135. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papatheodorou, C., Dallas, C., Ertmann-Christiansen, C., Fernie, K., Gavrilis, D., Masci, M.E., Constantopoulos, P., Angelis, S.: A new architecture and approach to asset representation for europeana aggregation: the CARARE way. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds.) MTSR 2011. CCIS, vol. 240, pp. 412–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gavrilis, D., Dallas, C., Angelis, S.: A curation-oriented thematic aggregator. In: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., Farrugia, C.J. (eds.) TPDL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8092, pp. 132–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has been funded by Greece and the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union under the O.P. Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship, NSRF 2007-2013 and the Regional Operational Program of ATTIKI in the frame of MEDA project, GSRT KRIPIS action.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Papatheodorou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gavrilis, D. et al. (2015). Measuring Quality in Metadata Repositories. In: Kapidakis, S., Mazurek, C., Werla, M. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9316. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24591-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24592-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics