Embedding and Implementation of Quantum Computational Concepts in Digital Narratives

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9353)

Abstract

Quantum computational concepts introduce a host of new ideas for describing and implementing computational processes based on notions of superposition, entanglement, interference and measurement. This paper explores how such quantum mechanical ideas can be used in the development and implementation of computational narrative environments. In particular we focus on the use of quantum computing concepts for the representation of character state and beliefs, the development of point-of-view and context-sensitive processes for decision making along with the representation of the notion of conflict. We describe the implementation of these ideas in QuNL, our novel, special-purpose declarative language for narrative construction along with QuNE its associated interpreter. Both systems are available on the Web for testing and experimentation.

Keywords

Quantum Computing Computational Methodologies for Entertainment Narratives 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle, PoeticsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pfister, M.: The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition. Cambridge University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goff, A.: Quantum tic-tac-toe: A teaching metaphor for superposition in quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics 74(11) (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitto, K., Boschetti, F.: Attitudes, ideologies and self-organization: information load minimization in multi-agent decision making. In: Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 16(2 & 3). World Scientific Publishing Company (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riedl, M.O., Young, M.R.: Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Character. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 39, 217–268 (2010)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porteous, J., Cavazza, M.: Controlling narrative generation with planning trajectories: The role of constraints. In: Iurgel, I.A., Zagalo, N., Petta, P. (eds.) ICIDS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5915, pp. 234–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sgouros, N.M.: Dynamic Generation, Management and Resolution of Interactive Plots. Artificial Intelligence 107(1), 29–62 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital SystemsUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations