Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a unique in-vivo capability of visualizing tissue in the human brain non-invasively, which has tremendously improved patient care over the past decades. However, there are still prominent artifacts, such as intensity inhomogeneities due to the use of an array of receiving coils (RC) to measure the MR signal or noise amplification due to accelerated imaging strategies. It is critical to mitigate these artifacts for both visual inspection and quantitative analysis. The cornerstone to address this issue pertains to the knowledge of coil sensitivity profiles (CSP) of the RCs, which describe how the measured complex signal decays with the distance to the RC.
Existing methods for CSP estimation share a number of limitations: (i) they primarily focus on CSP magnitude, while it is known that the solution to the MR image reconstruction problem involves complex CSPs and (ii) they only provide point estimates of the CSPs, which makes the task of optimizing the parameters and acquisition protocol for their estimation difficult. In this paper, we propose a novel statistical framework for estimating complex-valued CSPs. We define a CSP estimator that uses spatial smoothing and additional body coil data for phase normalization. The main contribution is to provide detailed information on the statistical distribution of the CSP estimator, which yields automatic determination of the optimal degree of smoothing for ensuring minimal bias and provides guidelines to the optimal acquisition strategy.
This work was supported in part by NIH Awards RO1 EB013248, RO1 NS079788, RO1 DK100404, RO1 EB019483 and 5R42 MH086984.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied maths, Dover Publications (1964)
Blaimer, M., Breuer, F., Mueller, M., Heidemann, R.M., Griswold, M.A., Jakob, P.M.: SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 15(4), 223–236 (2004)
Brey, W.W., Narayana, P.A.: Correction for intensity falloff in surface coil magnetic resonance imaging. Med. Phys. 15(2), 241–245 (1988)
Haacke, E., et al.: Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design, 1st edn. Wiley-Liss (1999)
Keil, B., Wald, L.L.: Massively parallel MRI detector arrays. J. Magn. Reson. 229(6), 75–89 (2013)
McVeigh, E.R., Bronskill, M.J., Henkelman, R.M.: Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging. Med. Phys. 13(6), 806–814 (1986)
McVeigh, E., Henkelman, R., Bronskill, M.: Noise and filtration in magnetic resonance imaging. Med. Phys. 12(5), 586 (1985)
Ongaro, A., Orsi, C.: On non-central beta distributions. In: Cabras, S., Di Battista, T., Racugno, W. (eds.) 47th SIS Sci. Meet. Ital. Stat. Soc. (2014)
Roemer, P., et al.: NMR phased array. Magn. Reson. Med. 16(2), 192–225 (1990)
Vovk, U., Pernuš, F., Likar, B.: A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stamm, A., Singh, J., Afacan, O., Warfield, S.K. (2015). Analytic Quantification of Bias and Variance of Coil Sensitivity Profile Estimators for Improved Image Reconstruction in MRI. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W., Frangi, A. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_82
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24570-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24571-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)