Advertisement

Small Bowel Resection

  • Laura E. Fischer
  • Luke M. FunkEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Small bowel resection is a common procedure which is performed for a wide variety of indications in all age groups. Multiple different techniques to accomplish a small bowel resection and anastomosis have developed over the last 200 years, including the open versus laparoscopic approach, single versus double layer, and hand-sewn versus stapled anastomosis. In general, the various surgical techniques are similar in outcome as long as common principles are followed: adequate exposure, gentle tissue handling, absence of tension, and adequate tissue oxygenation.

Keywords

Small Intestine Resection Anastomosis Laparoscopy Stapled Hand-sewn 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen C. The art of bowel anastomosis. Scand J Surg. 2012;101:238–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:1–49.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson RL, Gladman E, Barbateskovic M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:1–262.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yildiz BD. Where are we at with short bowel syndrome and small bowel transplant? World J Transpl. 2012;2(6):95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burlew CC, Moore EE, Cuschieri J, Jurkovich GJ, Codner P, Crowell K, Nirula R, Haan J, Rowell SE, Kato CM, MacNew H, Ochsner MG, Harrison PB, Fusco C, Sauaia A, Kaups KL, The WTA Study Group. Sew it up! a western trauma association multi-institutional study of enteric injury management in the postinjury open abdomen. J Trauma. 2011;70:273–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Offner PJ. Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231(6):832–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shikata S, Yamagishi H, Taji Y, Shimada T, Noguchi Y. Single- versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2006;6:2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witzke JD, Kraatz JJ, Morken JM, Ney AL, West MA, Van Camp JM, Zera RT, Rodriguez JL. Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: a changing perspective. J Trauma. 2000;49:660–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland anastomosis study group. Ann Surg. 1995;221:176–84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milsom JW, Hammerhofer KA, Bohm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(5):605–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(41):4545–53.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daly SC, Popoff AM, Fogg L, Francescatti AB, Myers JA, Millikan KW, Deziel DJ, Luu MB. Minimally invasive technique leads to decreased morbidity and mortality in small bowel resections compared to an open technique: an ACS-NSQIP identified target for improvement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1171–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:1–31.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beard TL, Leslie JB, Nemeth J. The opioid component of delayed gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1259–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations