International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web

Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web pp 32-47 | Cite as

An Advanced Query and Result Rewriting Mechanism for Information Retrieval Purposes from RDF Datasources

  • Efthymios Chondrogiannis
  • Vassiliki Andronikou
  • Efstathios Karanastasis
  • Theodora Varvarigou
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 518)

Abstract

The volume and variety of data published on the Semantic Web is constantly increasing with a growing number of entities and stakeholders expressing their data in the form of OWL and/or RDFS ontologies. However, a large amount of data is still maintained in relational databases. The recent developments in SPARQL endpoints, such as D2R server, constitute an important step towards the introduction of relational databases in the Semantic Web. However, the underlying models are tightly linked with the data structure and controlled terminologies employed, and hence, they pose a serious barrier to accessing the data by using different languages. In our previous work, we presented an Ontology Alignment Tool for bridging the gap among the terms of two ontologies based on the instantiation of one or more Ontology Patterns. In this paper, we analytically describe a novel approach and an accordingly designed system for enabling users to access data residing in relational databases by using different models and vocabularies than the ones supported by the SPARQL endpoint. The approach is based on the specification and consumption of correspondences with particular focus on SPARQL query and RDF data rewriting mechanisms, which are responsible for making the necessary changes in the queries and optionally results retrieved from the SPARQL endpoint taking into account the models and vocabularies used in each side.

Keywords

Semantic web Query answering Ontology alignment D2R server Relational databases 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W3C - Web Ontology Language (OWL). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
  2. 2.
    W3C - RDF Schema (RDFS). http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Chondrogiannis, E., Andronikou, V., Karanastasis, E., Varvarigou, T.: A novel framework for user-friendly ontology-mediated access to relational databases. In: International Conference on Web and Semantic Technology, vol. 1(3), p. 1100. WASET (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chondrogiannis, E., Andronikou, V., Mourtzoukos, K., Tagaris, A., Varvarigou, T.: A novel query rewriting mechanism for semantically interlinking clinical research with electronic health records. In: 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, pp. 48:1–48:12. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W3C - SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
  7. 7.
    Cruz, I.F., Antonelli, F.P., Stroe, C.: Agreement maker efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Very Large Databases, pp. 1586–1589 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolli, R., Doshi, P.: OPTIMA: tool for ontology alignment with application to semantic reconciliation of sensor metadata for publication in SensorMap. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2008), pp. 484–485. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Massmann, S., Raunich, S., Aumueller, D., Arnold, P., Rahm, E.: Evolution of the coma match system. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Bonn, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25(1), 158–176 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scharffe, F., de Bruijn, J.: A language to specify mappings between ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Internet Based Systems IEEE Conference (SITIS 2005), Yandoue, Cameroon (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scharffe, F., Fensel, D.: Correspondence patterns for ontology alignment. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 83–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Šváb-Zamazal, O., Svátek, V., Scharffe, F., David, J.: Detection and transformation of ontology patterns. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds.) IC3K 2009. CCIS, vol. 128, pp. 210–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghawi, R., Poulain, T., Gomez, G., Cullot N.: OWSCIS: ontology and web service based cooperation of information sources. In: Proceedings of the Third International IEEE Conference on Signal-Image Technologies and Internet-Based Systems (SITIS 2007), pp. 246–253. IEEE Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W3C - Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences (HCLS) Interest Group. http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls/
  16. 16.
    Correndo, G., Salvadores, M., Millard, I., Glaser, H., Shadbolt, N.: SPARQL query rewriting for implementing data integration over linked data. In: Proceedings of the 2010 EDBT/ICDT Workshops (EDBT 2010), pp. 4:1–4:11. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Euzenat, J., Polleres, A., Scharffe, F.: Processing ontology alignments with SPARQL. In: Second International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS-2008), pp. 913–917 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W3C - Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  19. 19.
    Chondrogiannis, E., Andronikou, V., Karanastasis, E., Varvarigou, T.: An intelligent ontology alignment tool dealing with complicated mismatches. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences, Berlin, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organization (WHO) - International Classification of Diseases (ICD). http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
  21. 21.
    W3C - Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language. http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/
  22. 22.
    Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 34(3), 1–45 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karanastasis, E., Andronikou, V., Chondrogiannis, E., Tsatsaronis, G., Eisinger, D., Petrova, A.: The OpenScienceLink architecture for novel services exploiting open access data in the biomedical domain. In: 18th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, pp. 28:1–28:6 ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Efthymios Chondrogiannis
    • 1
  • Vassiliki Andronikou
    • 1
  • Efstathios Karanastasis
    • 1
  • Theodora Varvarigou
    • 1
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations