Abstract
Chemistry transport models (CTMs) are a powerful tool to investigate various features of the aerosol pollution in megacities, including its geographical origin or its sensitivity to anthropogenic emissions changes (scenario analysis). However, due to the numerous uncertainties still at stake in CTMs, assessing the reliability of the results obtained in these two common exercises remains a challenging task that usually requires specific observations and methodologies. In our work, we have taken advantage of some recent campaigns in the Paris region—PARTICULES and FRANCIPOL—to run a diagnostic evaluation of the CHIMERE model regarding these two issues. The first substantive point is to assess in what extent the model is able to retrieve the correct share between local production and regional advection of aerosol pollution in the Paris agglomeration. During a whole year, daily measurements of the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its main chemical constituents (elemental and organic carbon, nitrate, sulfate and ammonium) are available at various stations both in and around Paris (PARTICULES project). Based on back-trajectory data, we can locate the upwind station, from which the concentration is identified as the import, the local production being deduced from the urban concentration by subtraction. Uncertainties on these contributions are quantified. Small biases in urban background PM2.5 simulations (+16 %) hide significant error compensations between local and advected contributions, as well as in PM2.5 chemical compounds. In particular, wintertime OM imports appear strongly underestimated (potentially explained by uncertain continental woodburning emissions and missing SOA pathways) while local OM and EC production are overestimated all along the year (likely to be related to uncertainties in emissions and dynamics). A statistically significant local formation of nitrate is also highlighted from observations, but missed by the model. Together with the overestimation of nitrate imports, it leads to a bias of +51 % on the local PM2.5 contribution. In parallel to inorganic aerosols measurements, gaseous nitrate precursors (nitric acid and ammonia) have also been measured (FRANCIPOL project), which offers the opportunity to investigate the regime of nitrate formation in Paris and its sensitivity to precursor changes and to assess, again, the ability of the CHIMERE model to retrieve the observed sensitivity. Experimental data clearly point to NH3-rich conditions in the city (as indicated by high gas ratio values), but a quite similar sensitivity of nitrate concentrations to changes in nitric acid and ammonia. However, simulation results indicate that the model highly overestimates the sensitivity of nitrate to ammonia changes. Thus, while overall particulate matter levels are well reproduced by the model, differences with observations are much larger for local versus advected contributions, and the sensitivity of nitrate formation with respect to gaseous precursors.
Key topics: Model assessment and verification (and in some extent Aerosol in the atmosphere).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bressi M, Sciare J, Ghersi V, Bonnaire N, Nicolas JB, Petit J-E, Moukhtar S, Rosso A, Mihalopoulos N, Féron A (2013) A one-year comprehensive chemical characterisation of fine aerosol (PM2.5) at urban, suburban and rural background sites in the region of Paris (France). Atmos Chem Phys 13(15):7825–7844
Menut L, Bessagnet B, Khvorostyanov D, Beekmann M, Blond N, Colette A, Coll I, Curci G, Foret G, Hodzic A, Mailler S, Meleux F, Monge J-L, Pison I, Siour G, Turquety S, Valari M, Vautard R, Vivanco MG (2013) CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric composition modelling. Geosci Model Dev 6:981–1028
Petetin H, Beekmann M, Sciare J, Bressi M, Rosso A, Sanchez O, Ghersi V (2014) A novel model evaluation approach focusing on local and advected contributions to urban PM2.5 levels—application to Paris, France. Geosci Model Dev 7(4):1483–1505
Petetin H, Sciare J, Bressi M, Rosso A, Sanchez O, Sarda-Estève R, Petit JE, Beekmann M (2015) Assessing the ammonium nitrate formation regime in the Paris megacity and its representation in the CHIMERE model. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 15:23731–23794
Takahama S, Wittig AE, Vayenas DV, Davidson CI, Pandis SN (2004) Modeling the diurnal variation of nitrate during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study. J Geophys Res 109(D16) D16S06
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by a PhD DIM grant from the Ile-de-France region. The PARTICULES project has been funded by the French state, the Ile-de-France region and the Paris city. The FRANCIPOL project has received funding from PRIMEQUAL, CNRS, CEA, the Ile-de-France region, ACTRIS and DIM R2DS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Petetin, H. et al. (2016). Diagnostic Evaluations of the CHIMERE Model: Local Versus Advected Contributions of Fine Particles and Nitrate Formation Regime in the Paris Megacity. In: Steyn, D., Chaumerliac, N. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIV. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24478-5_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24478-5_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24476-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24478-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)