Abstract
Analyzing the welfare effects of pricing practices is not simple in the postal sector, where the sender pays all and the preferences of the recipients are not incorporated directly in the price.
Any views or opinions presented in this chapter are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Poste Italiane or CRA or any of the affiliated institutions. We would like to thank the discussant Frank Rodriguez, Associate, Oxera, and the Chairman of the session Michael Crew, CRRI Rutgers University for their constructive comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Intuitively, business senders take into account the value of their message to the recipient in deciding whether and when to send a message. For example, advertisers mail when a special campaign needs to reach the recipient on Friday or Saturday morning for the weekend shopping. However, this does not generally apply to all recipient of the campaign and the campaign turns out only for a minority of recipient. If the recipient does not cover the cost directly or pay the sender indirectly, then probably the recipient is neutral or negative to a campaign (environmental concerns).
- 2.
Choice-based conjoint analysis also has disadvantages “……due to the fact that having respondents make choices is an inefficient way to elicit preferences. Each concept is typically described on all the attributes being considered in the study, and each choice set contains several concepts. Therefore, the respondent has to process a lot of information before giving a single answer for each choice set. Although this does mimic what happens in the marketplace, the analyst ends up with far less information than would have been available had the task been to rate each alternative in the set.” (Sawtooth 2013, p. 3)
- 3.
The sample was created using a casual sample from the phone directory taking into account the gender, age, geographical distribution of the population and the type of city of residence (e.g., metropolitan, small city).
- 4.
Results are statistically significant, 95 % confidence interval.
References
Accent (2008) Postal universal service obligation: value to the citizen. Report Prepared for Postwatch
Boldon F, Joram D, Martin Felisberto C, Friedli B, Finger M, Krähenbühl D, Trinkner U (2006) Pricing the last mile in the postal sector. In: Crew MA, Kleindorfer P (eds) Progress toward liberalization of the postal and delivery sector. Springer, New York, pp 343–356
Cecchet M, Coulier J, Damgaard M, Doise N, Guillot C, Janin Lionel, Muller P, Swinand GP (2011) Quality of service regulation and consumers needs: recent evidence from France. Presented at the 19th Conference on Postal and Delivery Conference, Jersey, June 3, 2011
Copenhagen Economics (2010) Main developments in the postal sector (2008–2010), Final Report, 29 Nov 2010, for DG MARKT. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/doc/studies/2010-main-developments_en.pdf
Felisberto C, Friedli B, Finger M, Krähenbühl D, Trinkner U (2006) Pricing the last mile in the postal sector. In: Crew MA, Kleindorfer P (eds) Progress toward liberalization of the postal and delivery sector. Springer, New York
Jimenez L, Diakova E, Szeto C (2006) Generational analysis of mail users. In: Crew M, Kleindorfer P (eds) Progress toward liberalization of the postal and delivery sector, vol 49, Topics in regulatory economics and policy. Springer, New York, pp 281–300
Owen BM, Willig RD (1983) Economic and postal pricing policy. In: Fleishman J (ed) The future of the postal service. Praeger, New York
Panzar JC (1991) Is postal service a natural monopoly. In: Crew M, Kleindorfer P (eds) Competition and innovation in postal services. Lexington Books, Boston, pp 219–231
RAND Europe (2011) Technical report: study on appropriate methodologies to better measure consumer preferences for postal services. Report for the European Union
Sawtooth Software, Technical Paper Series (2013) The CBC system for choice-based conjoint analysis. https://sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/cbctech.pdf
Schwarz-Schilling C (2001) Pricing schemes in liberalized postal markets. Presented at the IDEI conference on Competition and Universal Service in the Postal Sector, University of Toulouse, 6–7 December
The Boston Consulting Group (2011) The postman always brings twice. BCG, Boston
TNS (2010a) Residential customer needs from a sustainable universal postal service in the UK. TNS-BMRB Report for PostComm and Consumer Focus
TNS (2010b) Business customer needs from a sustainable universal postal service in the UK. TNS-BMRB Report for PostComm and Consumer Focus
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gori, S., Martinelli, B.M., Scarfiglieri, G. (2016). Using Market Research to Analyze Consumer Preferences. In: Crew, M., Brennan, T. (eds) The Future of the Postal Sector in a Digital World. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24454-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24454-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24452-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24454-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)