Abstract
Freeman Neurodynamics may be complementary to conventional analysis of direct cortical recording. (ECoG) Freeman and Kozma have discovered nonlinear dynamical phenomena in cortex, involving the dendritic feltwork of Layer I. After Hilbert analysis, a strip of electrodes with sufficient spatial density reveals intermittent phase equilibria interrupted by \(\sim \)10 Hz phase collapses. This activity propagates via phase dispersion. Kozma and Freeman, Advances in cognitive neurodynamics, 2015, [10] propose that “the rapid propagation of phase dispersion over the hemisphere is the manifestation of the cognitive broadcast as described in Baars’ global workspace theory.” Sensory contents might be expressed in “spatial patterns of amplitude modulation of beta and gamma waves.” This view emerges from Freeman K sets, including recent modeling using the concept of neuropercolation in sets of cellular automata. It also implies scale-free dynamics and inverse power-law distributions of cortical connectivity and EEG power. Yet what is it that is being propagated? In the conventional view, conscious visual percepts emerge from more than 40 visuotopical activity arrays linked bidirectionally, so that adaptive resonance enables a problem-solving trajectory terminating in a coherent visual gestalt via winner-take-all competition . New findings indicate that such visual gestalts emerge in at high levels of the visual hierarchy, whence they are accurately propagated to the prefrontal lobe , consistent with global workspace theory Panagiotaropoulos et al., Neuron 74(5):924–935, 2012, [12] and Baars et al., Front Psychol 4:200, 2013, [2]. Conventional ECoG analysis may reflect the cognitive aspect of global binding and broadcasting, while Freeman Neurodynamics may convey intentional information—biological goals and conditioned stimuli. In Franklin’s terms, the dendritic neuropil may shape action selection , while axonal resonance may support perceptual contents. One possibility is that cortex evolved a variety of Sparse Distributed Memory (SDM) Kanerva, Sparse distributed memory, 2003, [7] and Snaider and Franklin, Cogn. Comput. 6(3):510–527, 2014, [13], a very efficient, non-local way to pack information into high-dimensional bit vectors. This suggests that some brain region acts as a minimal retrieval vector for episodic learning. The hippocampus and the claustrum may be candidates for such an SDM vector substrate .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some regions of cortex do not support conscious contents directly, like the parietal maps of nearby space, as shown by visual neglect. Therefore cortex seems to be needed for conscious perception, but there are cortical regions that do not (directly) support conscious perception. I have made the argument that parietal egocentric and allocentric visual maps provide contextual information to define the nearby space within which conscious visual objects and events are experienced. Thus parietal regions (dorsal visual stream) are needed for visual percepts, but do not directly support the visible features of percepts.
References
Baars BJ (1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York
Baars BJ, Franklin S, Ramsoy TZ (2013) Global workspace dynamics: cortical binding and propagation enables conscious contents. Front Psychol 4:200. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00200.eCollection
Canolty RT, Edwards E, Dalal SS, Soltani M, Nagarajan SS, Kirsch HE, Berger MS, Barbaro NM, Knight RT (2006) High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313(5793):1626–1628
Chung K, Deisseroth K (2013) CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nat Methods 10(6):508–513. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2481
Franklin SP (1997) Artificial minds. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge
Freeman WJ (2003) Evidence from human scalp electroencephalograms of global chaotic itinerancy. Chaos 13(3):1067–1077
Kanerva P (2003) Sparse distributed memory. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge
Kozma R, Puljic M, Balister P, Bollobas B, Freeman WJ (2005) Phase transitions in the neuropercolation model of neural populations with mixed local and non-local interactions. Biol Cybern 92(6):367–379
Kozma R (2007) Neuropercolation. Scholarpedia 2(8):1360
Kozma R, Freeman WJ (2015) Modeling cortical singularities during the cognitive cycle using random graph theory. Advances in cognitive neurodynamics (IV). Springer, The Netherlands, pp 137–142
Lorenz EN (1969) Three approaches to atmospheric predictability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 50:345–349
Panagiotaropoulos TI, Deco G, Kapoor V, Logothetis NK (2012) Neuronal discharges and gamma oscillations explicitly reflect visual consciousness in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron 74(5):924–935. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.013
Snaider J, Franklin S (2014) Modular composite representation. Cogn. Comput. 6(3):510–527. doi:10.1007/s12559-013-9243-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baars, B.J. (2016). Commentary by B. Baars. In: Cognitive Phase Transitions in the Cerebral Cortex - Enhancing the Neuron Doctrine by Modeling Neural Fields. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24406-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24406-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24404-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24406-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)