Skip to main content

A Tool for Assessing Quality of Rescue Plans by Combining Visualizations of Different Business Process Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries (ISCRAM-med 2015)

Abstract

Rescue plans for crisis situations such as natural or made disasters are mostly presented in a textual format to the relevant authority. Assessing the quality of a rescue plan requires analyzing different perspectives, such as plan complexity, resources costs, service time, allocation strategy and organization efficiency. Unfortunately, textual rescue plans lack a formal structure to ease the reading and navigation through the document. To address this problem we are composing tailored visualizations, each visualization representing a particular perspective. We provide a domain specific language to describe domain specific visualizations of processes. We validate our approach using static and dynamic analysis of the Ho Chi Minh city rescue plan in case of a tsunami. Our approach provides recommendations that are useful for the authority to improve the original rescue plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.jboss.org/products/bpmsuite/overview.

  2. 2.

    https://camunda.com.

  3. 3.

    http://activiti.org/components.html.

  4. 4.

    http://www.bizagi.com.

  5. 5.

    http://www.a4bp.com.

  6. 6.

    A Smalltalk-inspired live programming environment to edit, manipulate and execute objects interactively: http://pharo.org.

  7. 7.

    http://www.bpsim.org.

  8. 8.

    http://objectprofile.com/Roassal.html.

References

  1. Prizzia, R.: The role of coordination in disaster management. In: Public Administration and Public Policy-New York, vol. 138, pp. 75 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Le, N.T.T., Hanachi, C., Stinckwich, S., Ho, T.V.: Representing, simulating and analysing Ho Chi Minh City Tsunami plan by means of process models. In: ISCRAM Vietnam 2013 (Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Le, N.T.T., Hanachi, C., Stinckwich, S., Ho, T.V.: Combining process simulation and agent organizational structure evaluation in order to analyze disaster response plans. In: Gordan Jezic, G., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications, Part II. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 38, pp. 55–68. Springer, Switzerland (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Le, N.T.T., Hanachi, C., Stinckwich, S., Ho, T.V.: Mapping BPMN processes to organization centered multi-agent systems to help assess crisis models. In: 7th International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence Technologies and Applications (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saoud, N.B.B., Mena, T.B., Dugdale, J., Pavard, B., Ahmed, M.B.: Assessing large scale emergency rescue plans: an agent based approach. Int. J. Intell. Control. Syst. 11(4), 260–271 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alegría, J.A.H., Bastarrica, M.C., Bergel, A.: AVISPA: a tool for analyzing software process models. J. Softw. Evol. Process. 26(4), 434–450 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grossi, D., Dignum, F.P.M., Dignum, V., Dastani, M., Royakkers, L.M.M.: Structural aspects of the evaluation of agent organizations. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso, J., Mendling, J., Neuman, J., Reijers, H.A.: A discourse on complexity of process models. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S., et al. (eds.) BPM 2006 Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4103, pp. 115–126. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cardoso, J.: Business process control-flow complexity: metric, evaluation, and validation. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. (IJWSR) 5(2), 49–76 (2008). IGI Global

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Nakatumba, J., Rozinat, A., Russell, N.: Business process simulation. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 313–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Makni, L., Khlif, W., Haddar, N.Z., Ben-Abdallah, H.: A tool for evaluating the quality of business process models. In: ISSS/BPSC, pp. 230–242 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis, B., Kellner, M., Over, J.: Process modeling. Commun. ACM 35(9), 75–90 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanza, M., Ducasse, S.: Polymetric views - a lightweight visual approach to reverse engineering. Trans. Softw. Eng. 29(9), 782–795 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demeyer, S., Ducasse, S., Nierstrasz, O.: Object-Oriented Reengineering Patterns. Square Bracket Associates, Kehrsatz (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergel, A., Cassou, D., Ducasse, S., Laval, J.: Deep Into Pharo. Square Bracket Associates, Kehrsatz (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Smalltalk User Group (http://www.esug.org). This work has been partially founded by Lam Research and FONDECYT project 224857 (Chile).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Stinckwich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peralta, A.J., Le, N.T.T., Stinckwich, S., Hanachi, C., Bergel, A., Ho, T.V. (2015). A Tool for Assessing Quality of Rescue Plans by Combining Visualizations of Different Business Process Perspectives. In: Bellamine Ben Saoud, N., Adam, C., Hanachi, C. (eds) Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries. ISCRAM-med 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24399-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24399-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24398-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24399-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics