Towards Sustainable Economies

  • Michael von HauffEmail author
  • Franz-Theo GottwaldEmail author
  • Katharina StöcklEmail author
  • Jelena KurzEmail author
  • Carolin BökerEmail author
Part of the Strategies for Sustainability book series (STSU)


In the current sustainability debate with economic justifications, other areas such as sustainable consumption clearly indicate that a decentralized level of execution is required to implement a sustainable development paradigm.


Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable Development Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Ecological Economic Neoclassical Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


References of Section 4.1

  1. Costanza R, Cumberland J, Daly H, Goodland R, Norgaard R (2001) An introduction to ecological economics. Stuttgart, Lucius & LuciusGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis GR (2013) Appraising weak and strong sustainability: searching for a middle ground. J Sustain Dev 10(1):111–124Google Scholar
  3. European Commission (2002) Mitteilung der Kommission betreffend die soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen: Ein Unternehmensbeitrag zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung. KOM (2002) 347 endgültig, Brüssel 02 July 2002Google Scholar
  4. Garmendia E, Prellezo R, Murillas A, Escapa M, Gallastegui M (2010) Weak and strong sustainability assessment in fisheries. Ecol Econ 96Google Scholar
  5. Hedinger W (2007) The conceptual strength of weak sustainability. PaperGoogle Scholar
  6. Lerch A, Nutzinger HG (1998) Nachhaltigkeit. Methodische Probleme der Wirtschaftsethik, Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 42Google Scholar
  7. Neumayer E (1999) Global warming – discounting is not the issue but substitutability is. Energy Policy 27(1):33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reller A, Dießenbacher J (2014) Reichen die Ressourcen für unseren Lebensstil? Wie Ressourcenstrategie vom Stoffverbrauch zum Stoffgebrauch führt. In: von Hauff M (Hrsg) Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Aus der Perspektive verschiedener Disziplinen, Baden-Baden, pp 89–114Google Scholar
  9. Ruth M (2006) A quest for the economics of sustainability and the sustainability of Economics. Ecological Economics 56(3):332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Steurer R (2001) Paradigmen der Nachhaltigkeit. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik (ZfU) 24:537–566, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  11. UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. von Hauff M (2014) Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Nomos Publ., Baden-Baden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. von Hauff M, Jörg A (2013) Nachhaltiges Wachstum. Oldenburg Publ. Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilderer P, von Hauff M (2014) Nachhaltige Entwicklung durch Resilienzsteigerung. In: von Hauff M (Hrsg) Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Aus der Perspektive verschiedener Disziplinen. Baden-Baden, pp 17–40Google Scholar

References of Section 4.2

  1. Bio-based Industries (2014) A major public and private effort. Accessed 16 Dec 2014
  2. Enríquez-Cabot J, Martínez R (1998) Genomics and the world’s economy. Sci Mag 281:925–926Google Scholar
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2010) National research strategy bioeconomy 2030. Our Route towards a biobased economy. Accessed 20 Nov 2014
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2014) Bioökonomie als gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Konzept zur Förderung sozial- und wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschung für die Bioökonomie. Referat Bioökonomie, Berlin. Accessed 21 Nov 2014
  5. Gottwald F-T (2015) Irrweg Bioökonomie. Über die zunehmende Kommerzialisierung des Lebens. In: Agrarbündnis e.V (ed) Der Kritische Agrarbericht. AbL Bauernblatt Verlag, Hamm, pp 259–264Google Scholar
  6. Gottwald F-T, Krätzer A (2014) Irrweg Bioökonomie. Kritik an einem totalitären Ansatz. Edition Unseld, Suhrkamp, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Hambrecht J (2010) Ohne Risiko kein Fortschritt. Interview mit Frank Stäudner. Wirtschaft & Wissenschaft 1/2010:27Google Scholar
  8. Zeidler C, Schubert D, Vrakking V (2013) CE-study: vertical farm Eden. Accessed 20 Nov 2014

References of Section 4.3

  1. BMU (2013) Towards a global carbon market – prospects for emission trading. 11 & 12 Apr 2013 – Documentation and summary, pp 5–6. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). Retrieved 29 Jan 2015 from
  2. Brown LR (1990) The illusion of progress. In: State of the world. Worldwatch Institute. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Douthwaite R (1993) The growth illusion: how economic growth has enriched the few, impoverished the many, and endangered the planet. Council Oak Books, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  4. Haque MS (1999) The fate of sustainable development under the neoliberal regimes in developing countries. Int Polit Sci Rev 20:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hempel LC (1996) Environmental governance: the global challenge. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirst PQ, Thompson G, Bromley S (2009) Globalization in question. Polity, Cambridge, pp 68–69Google Scholar
  7. Itty CI (1984) Development goals and values. In: Itty CI (ed) Searching for Asian paradigms. Asian Cultural Forum on Development, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerlin JA (2006) Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas 17(3):246–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leviten-Reid C, Fairbairn B (2011) Multistakeholder governance in co-operative organizations: towards a new framework for research. Can J Non-Profit Soc Econ Res 2(2):25–36Google Scholar
  10. Sanchez-Bajo C, Roelants B (2011) Capital and the Debt Trap. Learning from cooperatives in the global crisis. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shangquan G (2000) Economic globalization: trends, risks and risk prevention. Economic & social affairs, CDP background paper (1)Google Scholar
  12. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Schweisfurth FoundationMunichGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Resource ManagementHumboldt UniversityBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  5. 5.Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer ProtectionMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations