Regulation and Control Processes in Ecosystems

  • Wolfgang Haber
  • Jürg BloeschEmail author
Part of the Strategies for Sustainability book series (STSU)


The question whether and to what extent economic and societal systems should be organized by a central or decentral regime is an important one. Natural ecosystems, however, cannot serve as a model to answer this question. They are a-central in character.


Ecosystem Service Natural Ecosystem Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Waste Water Treatment Plant Dead Organic Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


References of Section 1.1

  1. Cook M (2005) A brief history of the human race. W. W. Norton, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Dincer I, Rosen MA (2007) Exergy. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Golley FB (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  5. Haber W (2004) The ecosystem. Power of a metaphysical construct. In: Zehlius-Eckert W, Gnädinger J, Tobias K (eds) Landschaftsökologie in Forschung, Planung und Anwendung, Schriftenreihe Landschaftsökologie Weihenstephan, vol 13, Freising, Germany, pp 25–48. [Revised version (2011) An ecosystem view into the 21st century. In: Schwarz A, Jax K (eds) Ecology revisited. Reflecting on concepts, advancing science. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg, pp 215–227 (Chapter 18)]Google Scholar
  6. Haber W (2007a) Zur Problematik europäischer Naturschutz-Richtlinien. Jahrbuch des Vereins zum Schutz der Bergwelt, vol 72. München, Germany, pp 95–110Google Scholar
  7. Haber W (2007b) Energy, food, and land – the ecological traps of humankind. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(6):359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haber W (2014) Ökosystemleistungen – strapaziertes Modewort oder neues Naturverständnis? Nat Landsch 89(2):50–55Google Scholar
  9. Jay P (2000) Das Streben nach Wohlstand. Die Wirtschaftsgeschichte des Menschen. Ullstein, Propyläen, Berlin. [Edition (2006) Patmos/Albatros, Düsseldorf, Germany]Google Scholar
  10. Küster H (2005) Das ist Ökologie. Die biologischen Grundlagen unserer Existenz. C. H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  11. Manning R (2004) Against the grain. How agriculture has hijacked civilization. North Point, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Odum EP (1973) Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd edn. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
  16. Wackernagel M, Beyers B (2010) Der Ecological Footprint. Die Welt neu vermessen. Europ Verlagsanstalt, HamburgGoogle Scholar

References of Section 1.2

  1. Bloesch J, von Hauff M, Mainzer K, Venkata Mohan S, Renn O, Risse V, Song Y, Takeuchi K, Wilderer PA (2015) Sustainable development integrated in the concept of resilience. Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development 10(1):7–14. [see also UN e-Inventory: Sustainable systems in the post-2015 development agenda: Keeping societies, economies and ecosystems resilient. Assessed 24 Nov 2014]
  2. Capra F (1982) The turning point: science, society, and the rising culture. Simon and Schuster, Bantam, PaperbackGoogle Scholar
  3. Darwin C (1869) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life, 5th edn. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond JM (2005) Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Gigantès P (2012) Macht und Gier in der Weltgeschichte. Anaconda Verlag, KölnGoogle Scholar
  6. Haber W (2007) Energy, food, and land – the ecological traps of humankind. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(6):359–365Google Scholar
  7. Haber W (2013) Ökologie: eine Wissenschaft unbequemer Wahrheiten – auch für die Ethik. Aus: Vogt M, Ostheimer J, Uekötter F (Hrsg) Wo steht die Umweltethik? Argumentationsmuster im Wandel, S. 325–343. Metropolis, Marburg (Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Nachhaltigkeitsforschung Bd. 5, 457S.)Google Scholar
  8. Jucker R (2002) Our common illiteracy – Education as if the Earth and people mattered, vol 10, Serie Umweltbildung, Umweltkommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., Germany, 346 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Kates RW (1994) Sustaining life on the earth. Hope for an environmentally sustainable future lies in evolving institutions, technology and global concern. Sci Am 1994:92–99, Special Issue OctoberGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanz K, Müller L, Rentsch C, Schwarzenbach R (2006) Wem gehört das Wasser? Lars Müller Publishers, Baden, Schweiz, 536 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Leisinger KM (1994) Bevölkerungsdruck in Entwicklungsländern und Umweltverschleiss in Industrieländern als Haupthindernisse für eine zukunftsfähige globale Entwicklung. GAIA 3:131–143Google Scholar
  12. Löbsack T (1974) Versuch und Irrtum. Der Mensch: Fehlschlag der Natur. C. Bertelsmann, Der MenschGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovelock J (1995) The ages of Gaia: a biography of our living earth. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Lovelock J (2009) The vanishing face of Gaia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Lovelock JE, Margulis L (1974) Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia hypothesis, vol 26(1–2), Tellus, Series A. International Meteorological Institute, Stockholm, pp 2–10Google Scholar
  16. Meadows DH, Meadows G, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J (1992) Beyond the limits. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VTGoogle Scholar
  18. Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows DH (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT, 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis reports. Assessed 24 Nov 2014
  20. Naess A (1989) Ecology. Community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy. Trans. David Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naess A (1995) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movements: a summary. In: George S (ed) Deep ecology for the 21st century. Random House, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. Odum EP, Barrett GW (2004) Fundamentals of ecology, 5th edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford, 624 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Paech N (2012) Befreiung vom Überfluss. Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstumsökonomie. Oekom Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  24. Raup DM (1986) Biological extinction in earth history. Science 231(4745):1528–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwarz A, Jax K (eds) (2011) Ecology revisited. Reflecting on concepts, advancing science. Springer, Dordrecht, 444 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, BCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of Munich, WZW facultyFreising-WeihenstephanGermany
  2. 2.Alumnus ETH Zürich, Eawag Dübendorf, SwitzerlandZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations