Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

Removing Barriers in Scientific Research: Concepts, Synthesis and Catalysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Cultural Traits

Abstract

This paper concludes a book on ‘cultural traits’ which features 20 contributions from the most diverse disciplines, from cultural anthropology to archaeology, from psychology to history, from economics to musicology. The paper dodges the attempt to make a conceptual synthesis, arguing positively for such avoidance. Borrowing a term from the U.S. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, the paper likens the book, Understanding Cultural Traits, to a catalysis meeting, i.e., a lowering of disciplinary barriers that influences the disciplines’ culture of data, broadens the scientific vision, and generates scientific collaborations. Catalysis is not alternative to synthesis. It is a different phase of scientific progress, one that can be hindered by an obsession for concepts and by an urge to close the discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) is an American NSF-funded collaborative research center operated by Duke University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and North Carolina State University (see Cunningham 2005; Sidlauskas et al. 2009; Rodrigo et al. 2013).

  2. 2.

    Interdisciplinary syntheses exist, and they may eventually “erode disciplinary boundaries or create new fields of study”.

  3. 3.

    Also in consideration of these documents and official declarations, Sidlauskas et al. are however optimistic that a new cultural shift is leading synthetic science to receive more support than ever (Sidlauskas et al. 2009: 874).

References

  • Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2010). Evolutionary novelty and the evo-devo synthesis: Field notes. Evolutionary Biology, 37(2–3), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2009). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. (2005). The right time for synthesis in evolutionary biology. BioScience, 55(2), 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, J. (2014). Interview to Emanuele Serrelli. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NESCent. (2004). A place for evolutionary synthesis in North Carolina’s Research Triangle. Original grant proposal to NSF [not online, courtesy of Jory Weintraub and Cliff Cunningham].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, A. (2014). Interview to Emanuele Serrelli. Durham: NESCent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, A., et al. (2013). Science incubators: Synthesis centers and their role in the research ecosystem. PLoS Biology, 11(1), p.e1001468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidlauskas, B., et al. (2009). Linking big: The continuing promise of evolutionary synthesis. Evolution, 64(4), 871–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank all NESCent leaders and staff, in particular Allen Rodrigo and Joel Kingsolver, for their great generosity in letting me interview them. My research on NESCent, synthesis and catalysis was supported by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), NSF grant #EF-0423641.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Serrelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serrelli, E. (2016). Concluding Remarks. In: Panebianco, F., Serrelli, E. (eds) Understanding Cultural Traits. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24349-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24349-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24347-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24349-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics