International Workshop on Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition

Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition pp 199-208 | Cite as

Discovery of Salient Low-Dimensional Dynamical Structure in Neuronal Population Activity Using Hopfield Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9370)

Abstract

We present here a novel method for the classical task of finding and extracting recurring spatiotemporal patterns in recorded spiking activity of neuronal populations. In contrast to previously proposed methods it does not seek to classify exactly recurring patterns, but rather approximate versions possibly differing by a certain number of missed, shifted or excess spikes. We achieve this by fitting large Hopfield networks to windowed, binned spiking activity in an unsupervised way using minimum probability flow parameter estimation and then collect Hopfield memories over the raw data. This procedure results in a drastic reduction of pattern counts and can be exploited to identify prominently recurring spatiotemporal patterns. Modeling furthermore the sequence of occurring Hopfield memories over the original data as a Markov process, we are able to extract low-dimensional representations of neural population activity on longer time scales. We demonstrate the approach on a data set obtained in rat barrel cortex and show that it is able to extract a remarkably low-dimensional, yet accurate representation of population activity observed during the experiment.

Keywords

Neuronal population activity Parallel spike train analysis Spatiotemporal patterns Hopfield network Ising model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Yuri Campbell for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Abeles, M., Bergman, H.: Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 70(4), 1629–1638 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arieli, A., Shoham, D.: Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single-unit recording in the cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 73(5), 2072–2093 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, E.N., Kass, R.E., Mitra, P.P.: Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat. Neurosci. 7(5), 456–461 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cover, T., Thomas, J.: Elements of Information Theory, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gansel, K.S., Singer, W.: Detecting multineuronal temporal patterns in parallel spike trains. Front. Neuroinformatics 6(May), 18 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grün, S., Rotter, S.: Analysis of Parallel Spike Trains. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillar, C., Effenberger, F.: hdnet - hopfield denoising network. https://github.com/team-hdnet/hdnet (2015)
  8. 8.
    Hillar, C., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Koepsell, K.: Efficient and optimal little-hopfield auto-associative memory storage using minimum probability flow. In: NIPS Workshop on Discrete Optimization in Machine Learning (DISCML) (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hillar, C., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Koepsell, K.: Novel local learning rule for neural adaptation fits Hopfield memory networks efficiently and optimally. BMC Neurosci. 14(Suppl 1), P215 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hillar, C., Tran, N.: Robust exponential memory in Hopfield networks. arXiv e-prints (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hopfield, J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 79(8), 2554–2558 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ising, E.: Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift fur Physik 31, 253–258 (1925)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCulloch, W., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biol. 5(4), 115–133 (1943)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minlebaev, M., Colonnese, M., Tsintsadze, T., Sirota, A., Khazipov, R.: Early gamma oscillations synchronize developing thalamus and cortex. Science 334(6053), 226–229 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Picado-Muiño, D., Borgelt, C., Berger, D., Gerstein, G., Grün, S.: Finding neural assemblies with frequent item set mining. Front. Neuroinformatics 7(May), 9 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pipa, G., Wheeler, D.W., Singer, W., Nikolić, D.: NeuroXidence: reliable and efficient analysis of an excess or deficiency of joint-spike events. J. Comput. Neurosci. 25(1), 64–88 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenblatt, F.: The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65(6), 386 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santos, L.V., Ribeiro, S., Tort, A.B.L.: Detecting cell assemblies in large neuronal populations. J. Neurosci. Methods 220(2), 149–166 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sohl-Dickstein, J., Battaglino, P., DeWeese, M.: New method for parameter estimation in probabilistic models: minimum probability flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(22), 220601 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the SciencesLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Redwood Center for Theoretical NeuroscienceBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations