Advertisement

In-App Reflection Guidance for Workplace Learning

  • Angela FesslEmail author
  • Gudrun Wesiak
  • Verónica Rivera-Pelayo
  • Sandra Feyertag
  • Viktoria Pammer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9307)

Abstract

In-app reflection guidance for workplace learning means motivating and guiding users to reflect on their working and learning, based on users’ activities captured by the app. In this paper, we present a generic concept for such in-app reflection guidance for workplace learning, its implementation in three different applications, and its evaluation in three different settings (one setting per app). From this experience, we draw the following lessons learned: First, the implemented in-app reflection guidance components are perceived as useful tools for reflective learning and their usefulness increases with higher usage rates. Second, smart technological support is sufficient to trigger reflection, however with different implemented components also reflective learning takes place on different stages. A sophisticated, unobtrusive integration in the working environment is not trivial at all. Automatically created prompts need a sensible timing in order to be perceived as useful and must not disrupt the current working processes.

Keywords

Workplace learning Reflective learning Reflection guidance Reflective note analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The project “MIRROR - Reflective learning at work” is funded under the FP7 of the European Commission (project number 257617). The Know-Center is funded within the Austrian COMET Program - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies - under the auspices of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and by the State of Styria. COMET is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG. The authors thank Marina Bratic for her work with regard to the KnowSelf evaluation.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexiou, A., Paraskeva, F.: Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through the implementation of an e-portfolio tool. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 3048–3054 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bannert, M., Reimann, P.: Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instr. Sci. 40(1), 193–211 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D.: Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In: Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (eds.) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 18–40. Routledge Falmer, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daudelin, M.W.: Learning from experience through reflection. Organ. Dyn. 24(3), 36–48 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, E.A.: Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(8), 819–837 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, E.A.: Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. J. Learn. Sci. 12(1), 91–142 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elango, S., Jutti, R.C., Lee, L.K.: Portfolio as a learning tool: students’ perspective. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 34(8), 511–514 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fessl, A., Bratic, M., Pammer, V.: Continuous learning with a quiz for stroke nurses. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 6(3), 265–275 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fessl, A., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Pammer, V., Braun, S.: Mood tracking in virtual meetings. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds.) EC-TEL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7563, pp. 377–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greaves, D.J., Gupta, S.K.: Portfolios can assist reflective practice and guide learning. Curr. Anaesth. Critic. Care 14, 173–177 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ho, J., Intille, S.S.: Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 909–918. CHI 2005. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055100
  12. 12.
    Ifenthaler, D.: Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(1), 38–52 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    King, A.: Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educ. Psychol. 27(1), 111–126 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knipfer, K., Wessel, D., DeLeeuw, K.: D1.5 Specification of Evaluation Methodology and Research Tooling, June 2012. http://www.mirror-project.eu/research-results/downloads/finish/5/67
  15. 15.
    Kunzmann, C., Schmidt, A., Attwell, G., Chan, E., Heinemann-Grüder, M., Hughes, J., Lan, W., Vratny, A., Heberle, A.: REFLECT: community-driven scaffolding for voice-enabled reflection on the go. In: 3rd Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pammer, V., Bratic, M.: Surprise, surprise: activity log based time analytics for time management. In: CHI’2013, 27 April - 2 May 2013, Paris, France (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, S., Lim, J.: Promoting reflective thinking process in designing e-portfolios. In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007, pp. 164–168 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pejovic, V., Musolesi, M.: InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp 2014, pp. 897–908. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prilla, M.: Collaborative reflection support at work: A socio-technical design task. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prilla, M., Renner, B.: Supporting collaborative reflection at work: a comparative case analysis. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Group Work (GROUP 2014). ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renner, B., Wesiak, G.: D10.3 Summative Evaluation of MIRROR Appsphere usage and effectiveness at test beds (2014). http://www.mirror-project.eu/research-results/deliverables/286-d103-summative-evaluation-of-mirror-appsphere-usage-and-effectiveness-at-test-beds
  22. 22.
    Rivera-Pelayo, V.: Design and Application of Quantified Self Approaches for Reflective Learning in the Workplace. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, February 2015Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rivera-Pelayo, V., Zacharias, V., Müller, L., Braun, S.: Applying Quantified Self approaches to support reflective learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. LAK 2012, pp. 111–114. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2330601.2330631
  24. 24.
    Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action, 1st edn. Basic Books, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tang, C.: Reflective diaries as a means of facilitating and assessing reflection. Paper presented to the Pacific Rim Conference on Higher Education Planning and Assessment, Hilo, Hawaii, 3–7 June 2000Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thillmann, H., Kuensting, J., Wirth, J., Leutner, D.: Is it merely a question of “what” to prompt or also “when” to prompt? Z. Pädagogische Psychol. 23(2), 105–115 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorpe, K.: Reflective learning journals: from concept to practice. Reflective Pract. 5(3), 327–343 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., Specht, M.: Reflection amplifiers in online courses: a classification framework. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 21(4), 654–666 (2010). Please check and confirm the edit made in Reference [29]Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker, S.E.: Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection. J. Athletic Training 41(2), 216–221 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xun, G., Land, S.: A conceptual framework for scaffolding iii-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52(2), 5–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Fessl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gudrun Wesiak
    • 1
  • Verónica Rivera-Pelayo
    • 2
  • Sandra Feyertag
    • 1
  • Viktoria Pammer
    • 3
  1. 1.Know-CenterGrazAustria
  2. 2.FZI Research Center of Information TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  3. 3.Knowledge Technologies InstituteTU GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations