Advertisement

Evolution of Interests in the Learning Context Data Model

  • Hendrik ThüsEmail author
  • Mohamed Amine Chatti
  • Roman Brandt
  • Ulrik Schroeder
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9307)

Abstract

A key area of application for Learning Analytics (LA) and Educational Data Mining (EDM) is lifelong learner modeling. The aim is that data gathered from different learning environments would be fed into a personal lifelong learner model that can be used to foster personalized learning experiences. As learning is increasingly happening in open and networked environments beyond the classroom and access to knowledge in these environments is mostly context-sensitive and interest-driven, learner’s contexts and interests need to constitute important features to be modeled. The context data of a learner as it is already represented by the Learning Context Data Model (LCDM) specification, describes the learner’s activities, her biological conditions, as well as the characteristics of the learning environment. Towards a lifelong learner model, a model consisting of context data can further be refined with an evolving set of interests. This paper describes an approach to extend the existing LCDM specification with interests, taking into account the importance of the interests as well as their evolution over time.

Keywords

Interests Mobile learning Data model Lifelong learner model Open learner model 

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, R.S.J.D., Yacef, K.: The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. J. Educ. Data Min. 1, 3–17 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 3–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models. In: Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. SCI, vol. 308, pp. 301–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatti, M.A., Lukarov, V., Thüs, H., Muslim, A., Yousef, A.M.F., Wahid, U., Greven, C., Chakrabarti, A., Schroeder, U.: Learning analytics: challenges and future research directions. eleed (10) (2104)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chatti, M.A., Dyckhoff, A.L., Schroeder, U., Thüs, H.: A reference model for learning analytics. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. (IJTEL) 4(5/6), 318–331 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, Y., Qiu, G, Bu, J., Liu, K., Han, Y., Wang, C., Chen, C.: Model bloggers’ interests based on forgetting mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008, pp. 1129–1130. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B.: Lifelong learner modeling. In: Durlach, P.J., Lesgold, A.M. (eds.) Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, pp. 140–164. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krapp, A.: Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learn. Instr. 12(4), 383–409 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moody, D.L.: Metrics for evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thüs, H., Chatti, M.A., Greven, C., Schroeder, U.: Kontexterfassung, -modellierung und -auswertung in Lernumgebungen. In: Proceedings of the 12. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, DeLFI 2014, pp. 157–162 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hendrik Thüs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohamed Amine Chatti
    • 1
  • Roman Brandt
    • 1
  • Ulrik Schroeder
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatik 9 (Learning Technologies)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations