Abstract
Mobile learning has received an increasing attention by the TEL community since 2010. While much research is available on the effectiveness of individual apps and educational approaches and despite that many higher education institutions introduced special mobile learning apps, relatively little is known about the rationale of scaling up mobile learning in higher education institutions. It reports on a case study, in which a mobile app solution has been integrated into a lecture at a major Swiss university. The study analyses the student’s use of mobile media and the use of a smart-phone app in a mobile blended learning setting. The results indicate that today’s students live in a multi device environment and are likely to use mobile apps in new contexts and settings if this is supported by an app. They also show that mobiles will not replace other delivery modes or technologies. Instead, the findings indicate that students used the mobile learning solution for extending and enriching their learning environment. Therefore, this study suggests that mobile learning needs to blend into rich learning environments, in which they co-exist with paper books, classroom experiences, laptops, and tablets. The insights define new requirements for both, mobile apps and virtual learning environments, in order to meet the future challenges of TEL in higher education.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Google Inc.: Our mobile planet. http://think.withgoogle.com/mobileplanet/en
Glahn, C.: Mobile learning in security and defense: foundations, technologies, approaches and challenges. Report; Center for security studies. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (2013). https://lo-f.at/glahn/2015/03/30/REPORT_MLearning_v14%20-%20final%20-%20with%20CC%20%281%29.pdf
Wong, L.-H., Looi, C.-K.: What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 57(4), 2364–2381 (2011)
Börner, D., Glahn, C., Stoyanov, S., Kalz, M., Specht, M.: Expert concept mapping study on mobile learning. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 27(4), 240–253 (2010)
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Vavoula, G.: The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In: Parsons, D. (ed.) Combining e-Learning and m-Learning: New Applications of Blended Educational Resources, pp. 151–177. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2011)
Traxler, J.: Defining mobile learning. In: Isaías, P., Borg, C., Kommers, P., Bonanno, P. (eds.) Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning 2005, pp. 261–266. IADIS, Malta (2005)
Graham, C.R., Woodfield, W., Harrison, J.B.: A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 18(7), 4–14 (2013)
López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L.: Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 818–826 (2011)
Ziebarth, S., UH, H.: Moodle4SPOC: a resource-intensive blended learning course. In: de Freitas, S., Rensing, C., Ley, T., Muñoz-Merino, P.J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8719, pp. 359–372. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Glahn, C., Hug, T., Gassler, G.: Embedded e-learning. New. Educ. Rev. 1, 243–254 (2005)
Gassler, G., Glahn, C., Hug, T.: Integrated micro learning – an outline of the basic method and first results. In: Auer, M., Auer, U. (Eds.) International Conference Villach/Austria “Interactive computer aided learning” ICL 2004. The future of Learning (2004)
Mitsopoulou, E., Glahn, C.: Interoperability issues and solutions for integrating mobile micro learning with learning management systems. In: Proceedings of the Microlearning 7.0 Conference, Krems, Austria, 25–26 September 2013
ADL Initiative: Experience API (2015). https://github.com/adlnet/xAPI-Spec/blob/master/xAPI.md
Glahn, C.: Using the ADL experience API for mobile learning, sensing, informing, encouraging, orchestrating. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies (NGMAST). IEEE Computer Society (2013)
ADL Initiative: Training and learning architecture (TLA) (2013). http://www.adlnet.gov/tla
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Electric Paper Evaluations systeme GmbH: EvaSys. https://www.evasys.de/uebersicht-evasys-suite.html
Acknowledgements
The research presented in this paper was partially supported by the IIL funds of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Zurich. The authors thank Prof. Frank Esser and Nicole Ernst for supporting this study in their lecture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Glahn, C., Gruber, M.R., Tartakovski, O. (2015). Beyond Delivery Modes and Apps: A Case Study on Mobile Blended Learning in Higher Education. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, E. (eds) Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. EC-TEL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24257-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24258-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
