Advertisement

Challenges of Scale Modelling Material Behaviour of Additive-Manufactured Nodes

  • Nicholas Williams
  • Daniel Prohasky
  • Jane Burry
  • Kristof Crolla
  • Martin Leary
  • Milan Brandt
  • Mike Xie
  • Hamed Seifi
Chapter

Abstract

The application of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies promises much innovation across the manufacturing sector, and has generated great interest in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. This paper presents and reflects upon early prototypes for integrating AM in a construction application, through the design of a prototype frame structure with linear members connected by nodes of unique shapes. As an enabler for design, a system is developed and implemented to integrate expertise across architecture, structural engineering and advanced manufacturing in order to design and detail components for single layer canopies. This includes the topology optimisation and additive manufacture of nodes, both of which require the control of material behaviour at small scales. A scaled pavilion structure and full-scale node prototypes were successfully realised. However, this first stage of research presented a number of challenges to modelling material behaviour across scales—both the physical size and production volumes.

Keywords

Topology Optimisation Additive Manufacture Selective Laser Melting Fuse Deposition Modelling Tensegrity Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ASTM F2792—12a (2012) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. ISO/ASTM 52915 (2014) 2013 Standard specification for additive manufacturing file format (AMF) Version 1.1Google Scholar
  3. Aremu A et al (2010) Suitability of SIMP and BESO topology optimization algorithms for additive manufacture. In: 21st annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium (SFF)—an additive manufacturing conference, Austin, Texas, pp 679-692Google Scholar
  4. Atzeni E, Salmi A (2012) Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atzeni E, Iuliano L, Minetola P, Salmi A (2010) Redesign and cost estimation of rapid manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 16(5):308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardell N et al (1996) The development of MURJ-3D: a modular, universal, reconfigurable joint for in 3D Space Frame Applications. Int J Space Struct 2(12):89–107Google Scholar
  7. Brewster S (2014) Why you won’t see a laser sintering printer on your desk any time soon. https://gigaom.com/2014/04/25/why-you-wont-see-a-laser-sintering-3d-printer-on-your-desk-anytime-soon. Accessed 29 Apr 2014
  8. Carlow J, Crolla K (2013) Shipping complexity: parametric design for remote communities. In: Zhang et al (eds) Global design and local materialization. In: 15th international conference, CAAD Futures 2103, Shanghai, China, 3–5 July 2013. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Galjaard S, Hoffman S, Ren S (2015) New Opportunities to optimize structural designs in metal by using additive manufacturing. In: Block P et al (eds) Advances in architectural geometry 2014. Springer, Switzerland, pp 79–92Google Scholar
  10. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies. In: Additive manufacturing technologies rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing, Boston, MA. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gu D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57(3):133–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halchak J, Wooten J, McEnerney B (2012) Layer build of titanium alloy complex-geometry components for rocket engines. In: Ti 2011—proceedings of the 12th World conference on titanium 3, Beijing; China, pp 1715–1718Google Scholar
  13. Huang X, Xie YM (2010) Evolutionary Topology optimization of continuum structures: methods and applications. Wiley, EnglandCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marble S (ed) (2012) Digital workflows in architecture: designing design—designing assembly—designing industry. Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  16. Piller F (2013) Three capabilities that make mass-customisation work. In: Piroozfar P, Piller FT (eds) Mass customisation and personalisation in architecture and construction. Routledge, New York, pp 17–30Google Scholar
  17. Rehme O, Emmelman C (2006) Rapid manufacturing of lattice structures with selective laser melting. In: Solid freeform fabrication, vol 6107, p 61070KGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruffo M, Tuck C, Hague R (2006) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low to medium volumes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 220(9):1417–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang X, Xie YM, Steven G (2005) Evolutionary methods for topology optimisation of continuous structures with design dependent loads. Comput Struct 83:956–963Google Scholar
  20. Zhai Y, Lados D, LaGoy J (2014) Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation. JOM 66(5):808–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Williams
    • 1
  • Daniel Prohasky
    • 1
  • Jane Burry
    • 1
  • Kristof Crolla
    • 2
  • Martin Leary
    • 3
  • Milan Brandt
    • 3
  • Mike Xie
    • 4
  • Hamed Seifi
    • 4
  1. 1.Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory (SIAL), School of Architecture and DesignRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Advanced Manufacturing Precinct (AMP)RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Centre for Innovative Structures and MaterialsRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations