Advertisement

Systems Integration, Human Factors, and Simulation

  • Kimberly P. Stone
  • Lennox Huang
  • Jennifer R. Reid
  • Ellen S. Deutsch
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

A systems approach recognizes that complex systems, such as healthcare systems, consist of many components with complex interrelationships. A systems approach seeks to understand the relationships between the components and the whole, to gain a greater understanding of actions and events. Simulation can be used to understand the systems factors that affect healthcare delivery and patient safety, improving the quality and safety of care. This chapter will introduce the concept of systems and human factors and the role of simulation in systems integration. We will then provide frameworks that can be used to apply a systems approach to simulation, review specific case examples, and conclude with an overview of how simulation and hospital infrastructure can integrate to maximize the impact of systems integration.

Keywords

Systems Human factors Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Safety I Safety II Systems integration In situ simulation Systems engineering Process improvement Latent safety threats Waste Improvement Root cause analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    INCOSE, A brief history of systems engineering. 2012. http://www.incose.org/mediarelations/briefhistory.aspx. Accessed 27 Sept 2012.
  2. 2.
    Systems science and engineering. In: Blanchard BS, Fabrycky WJ, editors. Systems engineering and analysis, 5th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2011. p. 3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Why do errors happen? In: Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is Human. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000. p. 49.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang A, Schye PM, Croteau RJ, O’Leary DS, Loeb JM. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Intl J Qual in Health Care. 2005;17(2):95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The driving forces. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, editors. Joint cognitive systems foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Florida: CRC Press; 2005. p. 9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://www.hfes.org//Web/AboutHFES/about.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2014.
  7. 7.
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://www.hfes.org/Web/TechnicalGroups/descriptions.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2014.
  8. 8.
    Hunt EA, Hohenhaus SM, Luo X, Frush KS. Simulation of pediatric trauma stabilization in 35 North Carolina emergency departments: identification of targets for performance improvement. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):641–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alfredsdottir H, Bjornsdottir K. Nursing and patient safety in the operating room. J Adv Nurs. 2007;61(1):29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wetzel EA, Lang TR, Pendergrass TL, Taylor RG, Geis GL. Identification of latent safety threats using high-fidelity simulation-based training with multidisciplinary neonatology teams. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(6):268–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T, Wears RL. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):468–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guise JM, Lowe NK, Deering S, Lewis PO, O’Haire C, Irwin LK, et al. Mobile in situ obstetric emergency simulation and teamwork training to improve maternal-fetal safety in hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(10):443–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burton KS, Pendergrass T, Byczkowski TL, Taylor RG, Moyer MR, Falcone RA, et al. Impact of simulation-based extracorporeal membrane oxygenation training in the simulation laboratory and clinical environment. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(5):284–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The machine that changed the world. New York: Scribner; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borror CM, editor. The certified quality engineer handbook. Third edn. Wisconsin: ASQ Quality Press; 2009. p. 321–32.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tennant G. Six Sigma: SPC and TQM in manufacturing and services. Vermont: Gower Publishing; 2001. p. 7–36.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hollnagel E. A tale of two safeties. Nucl Saf Simul. 2013;4(1) 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karwowski W. A review of human factors challenges of complex adaptive systems: discovering and understanding chaos in human performance. Hum Factors. 2012;54(6):983–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mistry KP, Jaggers J, Lodge AJ, Alton M, Mericle JM, Frush KS, et al. Using Six Sigma methodology to improve handoff communication in high-risk patients. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches (Vol 3: performance and tools). Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graban M. Lean hospitals: improving quality, patient safety, and employee engagement. New York: Productivity Press; 2011. p. 37–44, 89–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly P. Stone
    • 1
  • Lennox Huang
    • 2
  • Jennifer R. Reid
    • 1
  • Ellen S. Deutsch
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children’s HospitalSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsMcMaster University, McMaster Children’s HospitalHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Critical Care MedicineThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Pennsylvania Patient Safety AuthorityPlymouth MeetingUSA

Personalised recommendations