Skip to main content

Emerging Segments in Ethical Consumption: Young Adults and Cosmetics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing

Abstract

Young adult consumers represent one of the most promising market segments when considering ethical and sustainable consumerism. They embody the next generation of consumers and will potentially support the spread of ethical stances in the future. The present study explores young adults’ orientation towards sustainable and ethical consumption, focusing on a particular product category, i.e. natural, organic and ethical cosmetics. Through the analysis of 14 focus group discussions, the study is aimed at (1) better understanding the perceptions about product features, price levels, distribution, and communication activities of this product category, and (2) exploring the role of natural, organic and ethical cosmetics in the process of identity formation for young adults. Findings suggest that the consumption of ethical products has several implications for the process of identity formation, in particular the analysis highlights two alternative orientations towards ethical and sustainable cosmetics. These differences in sensitivity towards ethical and sustainable issues reflect a divergent perception of product ethicality, providing some crucial insights into cutting-edge issues that need to be addressed both by theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andorfer, V. A., & Liebe, U. (2012). Research on Fair Trade Consumption – a Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 415-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 868-882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P. & Devinney, T. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? the misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76 (4), 361-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. (1999). Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 63, 19-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Devinney, T. & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8 (3), 275-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2010). Ethical determinants for generations X and Y. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 465-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98 (4), 597-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucic, T., Harris, J., Arli, D. (2012). Ethical consumers among the Millennials: a cross-national study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110 (1), 113-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (7), 560-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M., Neville, B., & Whitwell, G. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97 (1), 139-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraman, V., Lennon, S. J., & Rudd, N. A. (2010). Social Identity Salience: Effects on Identity-Based Brand Choices of Hispanic Consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 27 (3), 263-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2009). Disposal and simple living: Exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8 (6), 327-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavin, B., & Lewis, A. (2005). Focus Groups on Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs. in R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 173-187). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39 (2), 363-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1997) Existential consumption and irrational desire. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 285-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, A. M., Price, L. L. (2011). Designing Solutions Around Customer Network Identity Goals. Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 36-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of consumer research, 32, 378-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79 (4), 445-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, P., Nelson, T., & Glassman, A. (2004). The Millennial generation: A strategic opportunity. Organizational Analysis, 12 (3), 255-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, T. L. (2000). Moderating Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (Eds.) (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, M. B., & Walker, B. A. (1996). Self-relevance and purchase goals: Mapping a consumer decision. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 232-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, C., Ratneshwar, S., & Mick, D. G. (2003). Consumer goal structures and goal determination processes: An integrative framework. In S. Ratneshwar, D. G. Mick, & C. Huffman (Eds.), The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, K. J., Roper, S. (2012). The commodification of self-esteem: branding and British teenagers. Psychology and Marketing, 29 (3), 117-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, M. F. (2002). Children’s relationships with brands: ‘True love’ or ‘one night’ stand?. Psychology&Marketing, 19, 369-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10 (3), 360-371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G., Lee, G., & Park, K. (2010). A cross-national investigation on how ethical consumers build loyalty toward fair trade brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 96 (4), 589-611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, R. E., Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 209-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26 (2), 87-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligas, M. (2000) People, products, and pursuits: exploring the relationship between consumer goals and product meanings. Psychology & Marketing, 17 (11), 983-1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, C., Szmigin, I., & Carrigan, M. (2010). Living production-engaged alternatives: An examination of new consumption communities. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 13 (3), 273-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Lee, N. (2006). Purchase decision-making in fair trade and the ethical purchase ‘gap’: ‘is there a fair trade twix?’. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14 (4), 369-386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). Fair trade: Towards an economics of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 241-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107, 606-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D. (2007). The MilGen and society. In Bahr, N., Pendergast, D. (Eds.), Being a Millennial adolescent: what do teachers need to know? (pp. 23-40). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A., II. (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept-based consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 19, 235-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal,17 (1), 29-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastiani, R., Montagnini, F., & Dalli, D. (2012). Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry. Evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming. Doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1343-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shembri, S., Merrilees, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2010) Brand Consumption and Narrative of the Self. Psychology & Marketing, 27 (6), 623-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Arsel, Z. (2004). The Starbucks brandscape and consumers’ (anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 631-642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorbjørnsen, H., Pedersen, P. E., Nysveen, H. (2007). ‘This is who I am’: identity expressiveness and the theory of planned behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24 (9), 763-785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varul, M. Z. (2009). Ethical selving in cultural contexts: Fairtrade consumption as an everyday ethical practice in the UK and Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 183-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behavior and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64 (3), 542-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. A., & Olson, J. C. (1994). The activated self in consumer behavior: A cognitive structure approach. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Research in Consumer Behavior, vol. 7 (pp. 135–171). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, R. A. (1993). Focus group research on sensitive topics: Setting the agenda without setting the agenda. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 167-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montagnini, F., Maggioni, I., Sebastiani, R. (2016). Emerging Segments in Ethical Consumption: Young Adults and Cosmetics. In: Campbell, C., Ma, J. (eds) Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics