Abstract
The service marketing literature has focused its efforts on individual influencing factors and dyadic relationships to explain frontline employees’ customer service behaviour and performance. This paper argues and demonstrates that this scope is too limited, as service employee behaviour and performance is not independent from the broader set of relationships surrounding them. We introduce a social network perspective to the analysis of service performance and distinguish between weaker simple ties and stronger multiplex ties consisting of advice and friendship relations in the studied branch networks of a major Australian bank. We find that it is the density of multiplex ties that predicts the performance-relevant value of social networks in a service setting. This effect is moderated by branch network size so that for larger branches the existence of dense multiplex ties increases performance more strongly than for smaller branches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory: Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchmson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 201-233.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations, The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations B2 - The strength of strong ties: the importance ofphilos in organizations (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lechner, C., Frankenberger, K., & Floyd, S. W. (2010). Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 865-889.
Lin, N., & Ensel, W. M. (1989). Life stress and health: Stressors and Resources. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 382-399.
Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 181-199.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure: New York : Free Press, c1968. enl. ed.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams. [Article]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 101-133.
Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2006). Multiple networks in organisations: Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Working paper.
Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange Status on the Effects of a Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: a handbook. 2nd ed., London: SAGE.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks provide what kinds of social support?, Advances in group processes (pp. 207-235). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guenther, M., Guenther, P., Bell, S.J., Robins, G.L. (2016). It’s the Strength of the Ties: How Multiplex Social Networks Among Frontline Employees Drive Service Performance. In: Campbell, C., Ma, J. (eds) Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24182-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24184-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)