Skip to main content

Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Sustainable Activities: An Analysis of the German and the Spanish Consumer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing

Abstract

This study focuses on the consumer’s perceived corporate sustainable activities in a cross-national comparison, contrasting German (n = 486) and Spanish (n = 503) consumers. We find German respondents to perceive a higher corporate sustainable behavior and better provided sustainable communication, ascertaining the highest perception among males between 18 and 25 years in Germany. Among the Spanish respondents, males were identified to exhibit the highest perception, whereas age proved to be not an influencing factor. Demonstrating different perception levels between the analyzed countries, our results indicate a better corporate sustainability level in Germany. Findings aim to help especially multinational companies to improve their information system, segment their customer base and define their marketing strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bageac, D., Furrer, O., & Reynaud, E. (2011). Management students’ attitudes towards business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 391-406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17, 51-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value: Exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 147-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreiro, J. M., Lopez, M. A., Losada, F., & Ruzo, E. (2002). Análisis de las dimensiones cognoscitiva, y afectiva del comportamiento ecológico del consumidor. Revista Galega de Economía, 11, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrero, I., Valor, C., & Rosa, J. M. (2010). Fomentando el consumo responsable en España. Documento de orientación de políticas públicas, pp. 1-12. Retrieved March 27, 2013 from http://www.council-consultores.com/uploads/documentos_adjunto/documentos_adjunto263.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. (2004). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management, 9, 108-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: Implications for international retailing. Journal of Retailing, vol. 78, pp. 61-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A model for Fair Trade buying behavior: The role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 361-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.): The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1-16). London, UK: EarthScan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E. B., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2011). Social influence and sustainability in households. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 117-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyllegard, K. (2005). Spanish consumers’ perceptions of US apparel speciality retailers’ products and services. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4, 345-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE) (2011). Spain’s population data. Retrieved January 15, 2013 from http://www.ine.es/inebmenu/mnu_cifraspob.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Keillor, B. D., D’Amico, M., & Horton, V. (2001). Global consumer tendencies. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 1-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75, 132-135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 121-147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Ginieis, M. (2011). Towards a holistic approach of the attitude behavior gap in ethical consumer behaviours: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Advances in Economic Research, 17, 77-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., Brito, P. Q., Pinto, J., & Higgs-Kleyn, N. (2001). Consumer Ethics in the European Union: A comparison of Northern and Southern views. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 117-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Market Science, 34, 158-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving Marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70, 154-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., & Pioch, E. (1994). The Elusive Euro-consumer. Consumer Policy Review, 4, 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (DeStatis) (2011). Germany’s population data, Retrieved March 12, 2013 from https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/link/tabelleErgebnis/12411-0020

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo, O., & Oksanen, R. (2004). Ethical consumerism: A view from Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28, 214-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17, 226-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1995). Ethics at the purchasing/sales interface: An international perspective. International Marketing Review, 12, 7-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stolz, J., Sánchez, H.M., Sobrino, J.R. (2016). Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Sustainable Activities: An Analysis of the German and the Spanish Consumer. In: Campbell, C., Ma, J. (eds) Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_169

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics