Abstract
There are now a variety of online tools available which can compare a submitted text with texts already in its database (or freely available online). The most widely used are CrossCheck, which is mainly used for texts in English, and AMLC (Academic Manuscript Literature Checking) from CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) that almost covers all contents of Chinese Integrated Knowledge Resources Database and is mainly used for texts in Chinese.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CrossCheck in the news. http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html.
ALPSP announces winners of 2008 awards. http://www.crossref.org/01company/pr/ALPSP_Awards_2012_Winners.pdf.
Pentz, E. 2015. CrossCheck: 2015 CrossRef workshop in Shanghai, 29 April 2015. http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html.
American Chemical Society (ACS). 2013. American Chemical Society Implements CrossCheck Plagiarism Screening. http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2013/october/acs-implements-crosscheck-plagiarism-screening.html
COPE: Plagiarism screening: An update on CrossCheck. Ethical p. 5. (http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/EthicalEditing_Summer2010_final.pdf)
iThenticate Admin Webinar. 2015. 19 February 2015 (http://www.slideshare.net/CrossRef/crosscheck-ithenticate-admin-webinar).
Zhang, Y.H. 2010. CrossCheck: An effective tool for detecting plagiarism. Learned Publishing 23: 9–14.
Zhang, Y.H., and X.Y. Jia. 2012. A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles. Learned Publishing 25(4): 292–307. doi:10.1087/20120408.
ALPSP Alert. 2014. Missed the ALPSP conference—read the blog (Issue no. 209, October 2014). UK: Association of Learned, Professional and Society Publishers. http://Alert.alpsp.org.
Kavanagh, S. 2014. Innovation versus ‘very good’ journals. http://blog.alpsp.org/2014_08_01_archive.html.
Zhang,Y.H. 2009. Academic misconduct as perceived from recent examples (7 May). ScienceTimes (in Chinese). http://www.sciencenet.cn/dz/dznews_photo.aspx?id=6007.
Errami, M., and H. Garner. 2008. Commentary—a tale of two citations. Nature 451: 397–399. http://dx.doi.org/.
Jacobs, A. 2008. How to counter academic dishonesty in STM journals (5 April 2008). Sciencenet. www.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2008428182451204881.html (in Chinese).
http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/whitepaper/3-1_misconduct.cfm#3.1.3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, Y.(. (2016). Detecting Potential Plagiarism. In: Against Plagiarism. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24160-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24160-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24158-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24160-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)