Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research

Metadata and Semantics Research pp 439-450 | Cite as

Standardizing NDT& E Techniques and Conservation Metadata for Cultural Artifacts

  • Dimitris Kouis
  • Evgenia Vassilakaki
  • Eftichia Vraimaki
  • Eleni Cheilakou
  • Amani Christiana Saint
  • Evangelos Sakkopoulos
  • Emmanouil Viennas
  • Erion-Vasilis Pikoulis
  • Nikolaos Nodarakis
  • Nick Achilleopoulos
  • Spiros Zervos
  • Giorgos Giannakopoulos
  • Daphne Kyriaki-Manessi
  • Athanasios Tsakalidis
  • Maria Koui
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 544)

Abstract

Conservation activities, before and after decay detection, are considered as a prerequisite for maintaining cultural artifacts in their initial/original form. Taking into account the strict regulations where sampling from art works of great historical value is restricted or in many cases prohibited, the application of Non-Destructive Testing techniques (NDTs) during the conservation or even decay detection is highly appreciated by conservators. Non-destructive examination include the employment of multiple analysis approaches and techniques namely Infrared Thermography (IRT), Ultrasonics (US), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), VIS–NIR Fiber Optics Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (FORS), portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (ESEM-EDX), Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and micro-Raman Spectroscopy. These produce a huge amount of data, in different formats, such as text, numerical sets and visual objects (i.e. images, thermograms, radargrams, spectral data, graphs, etc). Moreover, conservation documentation presents major drawbacks, as fragmentation and incomplete description of the related information is usually the case. Assigning conservation data to the objects’ metadata collection is very rare and not yet standardized. The Doc-Culture Project aims to provide solutions for the NDT application methodologies, analysis and process along with their output data and all related conservation documentation. The preliminary results are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Conservation Cultural objects Non-Destructive testing techniques CIDOC Dublin core Metadata Knn classifier 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Walston, S.: The Preservation and Conservation of Aboriginal and Pacific Cultural Material in Australian Museums. ICCM Bulletin 4(4), 9–21 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arinat, M., Shiyyab, A., Abd-Allah, R.: Byzantine glass mosaics excavated from the Cross Church, Jerash, Jordan: an archaeometrical investigation. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 14(2), 43–53 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Del Federico, E., Blümich, B., Chiari, G., Kehlet, C., Haber, A., Zia, W., Quang, S., Manzano, C.G.: Non-destructive multi-analytical investigation of roman mosaics at herculaneum. In: 5th Int. Conference on Synchrotron Radiation in Art and Archaeology (SR2A), New York, Unites States (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheilakou, E., Troullinos, M., Koui, M.: Identification of pigments on Byzantine wall paintings from Crete (14th century AD) using non-invasive Fiber Optics Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (FORS). Journal of Archaeological Science 41, 541–555 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheilakou, E., Dritsa, V., Saint, A., Theodorakeas, P., Koui, M., Kostanti, K., Christopoulou, A.: Non-invasive identification of pigments on mycenaean wallpaintings (14th -12th century BC) from the archaeological sites of mycenae and tiryns, peloponnese. In: Proc. the 9th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin, Ankara, Turkey (2014). (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saint, A.C., Cheilakou, E., Dritsa, V., Koui, M., Kostanti, K., Christopoulou, A.: The combined use of XRF and VIS-NIR FORS spectroscopic techniques for the non-invasive identification of pigments on archaeological works of art. Technart 2015- No-destructive and microanalytical techniques in art and cultural heritage, Catania, Italy (in press, 2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polikar, R.: Pattern Recognition, σε Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. John Wiley & Sons (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jain, A.K., Duin, R.P.W., Mao, J.: Statistical Pattern Recognition: a review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 4–37 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bishop, C.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification, 2nd Edition. Wiley (2000) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu, F., Qin, B., Feng, W., Wang, H., Huang, S., Lv, Y., Chen, Y.: Reducing Poisson noise and baseline drift in X-ray spectral images with bootstrap Poisson regression and robust nonparametric regression 58, 1739-1758 (2013). doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1739
  12. 12.
    Kyriaki-Manessi, D., Zervos, S., Giannakopoulos, G.: D4.2.1. identification of extension points to CIDOC- CRM. In: DOC-CULTURE, Thalis- Development of an integrated information environment for assessment and documentation of conservaiton interventions to cultural works/ objects with non-destructive techniques, Athens (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouis, D., Giannakopoulos, G.: Incorporate cultural artifacts conservation documentation to information exchange standards- the DOC-CULTURE case. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Integrated Information, Prague, Czech Republic, September 5–9, 2013Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kouis, D., Kyriaki-Manesi, D., Zervos, S., Giannakopoulos, G., Cheilakou, E., Koui, M.: Integrating non destructive testing techniques data for cultural heritage monuments to cidoc conceptual reference model. In: The 9th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin, Ankara, Turkey, June 3–5, 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vassilakaki, E., Kyriaki-Manessi, D., Zervos, S., Giannakopoulos, G.: CIDOCCRM extensions for conservation processes: a methodological approach. In: Sakkas, D. (ed.) 4th international Conference on Integrated Information, Madrid, Spain, September 5–8, 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amat, A., Miliani, C., Brunetti, B.G.: Non-invasive multi-technique investigation of artworks: A new tool for on-the-spot data documentation and analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14(1), 23–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Kouis
    • 1
  • Evgenia Vassilakaki
    • 1
  • Eftichia Vraimaki
    • 1
  • Eleni Cheilakou
    • 2
  • Amani Christiana Saint
    • 2
  • Evangelos Sakkopoulos
    • 3
  • Emmanouil Viennas
    • 3
  • Erion-Vasilis Pikoulis
    • 3
  • Nikolaos Nodarakis
    • 3
  • Nick Achilleopoulos
    • 3
  • Spiros Zervos
    • 1
  • Giorgos Giannakopoulos
    • 1
  • Daphne Kyriaki-Manessi
    • 1
  • Athanasios Tsakalidis
    • 2
  • Maria Koui
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Library Science and Information SystemsTechnological Educational Institute of AthensEgaleoGreece
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, NDT Lab, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Graphics, Multimedia and GIS System Lab, Computer Engineering and Informatics DepartmentUniversity of PatrasRio PatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations