Skip to main content

Endothelial Keratoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corneal Transplantation

Abstract

Full-thickness corneal transplant was for many years the only surgical option for corneal endothelial diseases. With the advantages of better visual potential, shorter recovery times, and lower rejection risk, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has now superseded penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for these conditions. This revolutionary change was initiated by the insight of Gerrit Melles that partial-thickness grafts could stick to the back of the cornea without sutures. Progressive surgical refinement and advances in instrumentation by many surgeons have led to widespread adoption. Currently, Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK) is the most popular surgical procedure for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has emerged as an alternative to DSEK offering improved vision, shorter recovery time, and reduced rates of immunologic graft rejections. Compared to DSEK, DMEK selectively replaces bare endothelium and Descemet’s membrane without a stromal scaffold. This chapter focuses on the evolution of EK, techniques, outcomes, and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tillett CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956;41:530–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17:618–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Melles GR, Lander F, Nieuwendaal C. Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case report of a modified technique. Cornea. 2002;21:325–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea. 2001;20:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea. 2004;23:286–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Price Jr FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:339–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Price Jr FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Price MO, Price Jr FW. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor Tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: six month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea. 2008;27:514–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Basak SK. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in endothelial dysfunctions: three months results in 75 eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56:291–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ólafsdóttir E. Making the transition from PK to DSEK: experiences during the learning curve. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(3):290–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Price FW, Price MO. Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft. Cornea. 2006;25:895–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Price MO, Price Jr FW. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty for treatment of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Cornea. 2007;26:493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Covert DJ, Koenig SB. Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:692–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Covert DJ, Koenig SB. New triple procedure: Descemet’s stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1272–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Price MO, Price Jr FW, Trespalacios R. Endothelial keratoplasty technique for aniridic aphakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:376–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1818–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melles GR, Lander F, Rietveld FJ. Transplantation of Descemet’s membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea. 2002;21:415–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25:987–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Studeny P, Farkas A, Vokrojova M, Liskova P, Jirsova K. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S). Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(7):909–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCauley MB, Price FW, Price MO. Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty: hybrid technique combining DSAEK stability with DMEK visual results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J. Ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taravella MJ, Shah V, Davidson R. Ultrathin DSAEK. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53(2):21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woodward MA, Titus MS, Shtein RM. Effect of microkeratome pass on tissue processing for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014;33:507–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehta JS, Shilbayeh R, Por YM, Cajucom-Uy H, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Femtosecond laser creation of donor cornea buttons for Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1970–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng YY, Hendrikse F, Pels E, Wijdh RJ, van Cleynenbreugel H, Eggink CA, van Rij G, Rijneveld WJ, Nuijts RM. Preliminary results of femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(10):1351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nottage JM, Nirankari VS. Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet’s stripping in eyes with previous penetrating corneal transplants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):24–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Murthy SI, Garg P, Sangwan VS. Endothelial keratoplasty without stripping the Descemet’s membrane. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(10):1473–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1846–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Macsai MS, Kara-Jose AC. Suture technique for Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:1123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Khor WB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuo AN, Harvey TM, Afshari NA. Novel delivery method to reduce endothelial injury in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(1):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(9):1578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Venzano D, Pagani P, Randazzo N, et al. Descemet membrane air-bubble separation in donor corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:2022–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Hofmann J, et al. Comparison of pneumatic dissection and forceps dissection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: histological and ultrastructural findings. Cornea. 2012;31:920–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: the bare minimum. In: Price Jr FW, Price MO, editors. DSEK: what you need to know about endothelial keratoplasty. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated; 2009. p. 119–46.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;18:2368–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tenkman LR, Price Jr FW, Price MO. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation: navigating challenges and improving efficiency. Cornea. 2014;33:319–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Feng MT, Burkhart ZN, Price Jr FW, Price MO. Effect of donor preparation- to-use times on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes. Cornea. 2013;32:1080–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, et al. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30:580–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jardine GJ, Holiman JD, Stoeger CG, Chamberlain WD. Imaging and quantification of endothelial cell loss in eye bank prepared DMEK grafts using trainable segmentation software. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39(9):894–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Agarwal A, Dua H, Narang P, Kumar D, Agarwal A, Jacob S, Agarwal A, Gupta A. Pre-Descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chaurasia S, Price FW, Gunderson L, Price MO. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). Ophthalmology. 2014;121:454–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized “no-touch” technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(1):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(1):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price MO, Price FW. Handheld slit beam techniques to facilitate DMEK and DALK. Cornea. 2013;32(5):722–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tsui JY, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, Wagoner MD. Phakic Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: prevalence and prognostic impact of postoperative cataracts. Cornea. 2011;30(3):291–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Price MO, Price DA, Fairchild KM, Price Jr FW. Rate and risk factors for cataract formation and extraction after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(11):1468–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price FW, Price MO. One-year outcomes in eyes remaining phakic after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:430–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chaurasia S, Murthy S, Ramappa M, Mohamed A, Garg P. Outcomes of Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with failed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;92:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and hybrid techniques for managing failed penetrating grafts. Cornea. 2013;32:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: visual rehabilitation, complications and graft survival rate. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2155–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Garg P, Murthy SI, Senthil S, Sangwan VS. Endothelial keratoplasty in the management of irido-corneal endothelial syndrome. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(4):564–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ramappa M, Ashar J, Vaddavalli PK, Chaurasia S, Murthy SI. Endothelial keratoplasty in children: surgical challenges and early outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(8):1149–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1126–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Letko E, Price DA, Lindoso EM, Price MO, Price Jr FW. Secondary graft failure and repeat endothelial keratoplasty after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):310–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Epstein D, Kruse FE. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):528–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shinton AJ, Tsatsos M, Konstantopoulos A, Goverdhan S, Elsahn AF, Anderson DF, Hossain P. Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(2):246–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Seery LS, Nau CB, McLaren JW, Baratz KH, Patel SV. Graft thickness, graft folds, and aberrations after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):910–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Holz HA, Meyer JJ, Espandar L, Tabin GC, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M. Corneal profile analysis after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and its relationship to postoperative hyperopic shift. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(2):211–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(1):47–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price Jr FW. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Phillips PM, Phillips LJ, Much JW, Maloney C. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results of the first 100 consecutive surgeries performed solo by a surgeon using 1 technique with 100% follow-up. Cornea. 2012;31(12):1361–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen ES, Phillips PM, Terry MA, Shamie N, Friend DJ. Endothelial cell damage in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the underfold technique: 6- and 12-month results. Cornea. 2010;29(9):1022–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Price MO, Price Jr FW. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):857–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price Jr FW. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):725–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Price Jr FW, Benetz BA, Menegay HJ, Lass JH. Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(2):246–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Talajic JC, Straiko MD, Terry MA. Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: then and now. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53(2):1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(6):1082–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30:1382–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Baydoun L, Tong C, Tse W. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1 to 5-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(4):762–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Feng MT, Price MO, Miller JM, Price Jr FW. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1116–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Anshu A, Price MO, Tan DT, Price Jr FW. Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(3):236–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Chaurasia S, Vaddavalli PK, Ramappa M, Garg P, Sangwan VS. Clinical profile of graft detachment and outcomes of rebubbling after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(11):1509–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Feng MT, Price MO, Price Jr FW. Update on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53(2):31–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wilhelmus KR, Stulting RD, Sugar J, et al. Primary corneal graft failure. A national reporting system. Medical Advisory Board of the Eyebank Association of America. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1497–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Phillips PM, Friend DJ. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea. 2008;27(10):1131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial keratoplasty a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Graft rejection after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:90–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hjortdal J, Pedersen I, Bak-Nielsen S, Ivarsen A. Graft rejection and graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty or posterior lamellar keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 2013;32(5):e60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Allan B, Terry MA, Price Jr FW, Price MO, Griffin NB, Claesson M. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:1039–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Anshu A, Price MO, Price Jr FW. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Gao W, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1644–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Naveiras M, Dirisamer M, Parker J, Ham L, Van Dijk K, Dapena I, Melles G. Causes of glaucoma after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:958–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Price MO, Price Jr FW, Kruse FE, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T. Randomized comparison of topical prednisolone acetate 1% versus fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014;33:880–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Anshu A, Planchard B, Price MO, da R Pereira C, Price FW Jr. A cause of reticular interface haze and its management after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012;31:1365–8.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kitzmann AS, Wagoner MD, Syed NA, Goins KM. Donor-related Candida keratitis after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28(7):825–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Sharma N, Agarwal PC, Kumar CS, Mannan R, Titiyal JS. Microbial keratitis after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(5):320–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Koizumi N, Okumura N, Ueno M, Nakagawa H, Hamuro J, Kinoshita S. Rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drop treatment as a possible medical treatment for fuchs corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 2013;32(8):1167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Okumura N, Koizumi N, Ueno M, Sakamoto Y, Takahashi H, Hirata K, Torii R, Hamuro J, Kinoshita S. Enhancement of corneal endothelium wound healing by Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitor eye drops. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(7):1006–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bruinsma M, Tong CM, Melles GRJ. What does the future hold for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; will ‘keratoplasty’ still be a valid procedure? Eye. 2013;27:1115–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne O. Price PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Villavicencio, O.F., Price, M.O., Price, F.W. (2016). Endothelial Keratoplasty. In: Hjortdal, J. (eds) Corneal Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24050-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24052-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics