Developments in Corneal Banking

  • Diego PonzinEmail author
  • Gianni Salvalaio
  • Alessandro Ruzza
  • Mohit Parekh
  • Stefano Ferrari


Eye banks are currently advancing to decrease the unnecessary manipulation of tissues in the operating theatre and reduce the high surgical skill or risk quotient for surgeries like EK or ALK. Development in the tissue storage techniques, surgical devices for advanced and selective surgery, modification and manipulation of the tissues, and designing new methodologies for ocular health care are now becoming a part of the eye bank activities. Apart from the research and development, eye banks are now taking a lead in standardizing and validating new procedures also for the clinics. Precut and preloaded tissues may potentially reduce the overall intervention costs and surgery time and enhance the surgical outcomes in the future. Synthetic media are being evaluated for corneal storage at 31–37 °C (organ culture) to replace serum. Manufacturing of surgical devices using three-dimensional (3D) printing may further enhance the capabilities of the eye banks. Thus, we envision that eye banks are growing not only in the field of procuring the tissues for transplantation but also in the field of research and development.


Eye bank Lamellar keratoplasty Corneal storage 3D printing and surgical device 



This chapter has been modified from Parekh M, Ferrari S and Ponzin D: Eye Banking: An Overview. In: Eye Banking: Changing Face of Corneal Transplantation (2015) with permission from Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

The chapter was supported by 2014 - Società Oftalmologica Italiana (SOI) grant to Dr. Ponzin.


  1. 1.
    Parekh M, Salvalaio G, Ruzza A et al. Posterior lamellar graft preparation. A prospective review from an eye bank on current and future aspects. J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:769860Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Croasdale CR, Schwartz GS, Malling JV. Keratolimbal allograft: recommendation for tissue procurement and preparation by eye banks, and standard surgical technique. Cornea. 1999;18(1):52–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohit P, Stefano F, Diego P. Eye Banking: an overview. In. Mohit P, Stefano F, Diego P. Eye Banking: Changing face of corneal transplantation. Nova Biomedical; 2015. p. 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Eye Bank Association. Agreements on minimum standards.
  5. 5.
    Eye Bank Association of America. Medical Standards.
  6. 6.
    Wiffen SJ, Nelson LR, Ali AF, Bourne WM. Morphologic assessment of corneal endothelium by specular microscopy in evaluation of donor corneas for transplantation. Cornea. 1995;14(6):554–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pels L, Schuchard Y. Organ culture in the Netherlands. Preservation and endothelial evaluation, chapter 46. In: Brightbill FS, editor. Corneal surgery. Theory, technique and tissue. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier Publisher; 1993. p. 622–32.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Komuro K, Hodge DO, Gores GJ, Bourne WM. Cell death during corneal storage at 4°C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(12):2827–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pels E, Beele H, Claerhout I. Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28(3):155–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borderie VM, Laroche L. Microbiologic study of organ-cultured donor corneas. Transplantation. 1998;66(1):120–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zanetti E, Mucignat G, Camposampiero D, Frigo AC, Bruni A, Ponzin D. Bacterial contamination of human organ-cultured corneas. Cornea. 2005;24(5):603–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu W. The past twenty-five years in eye banking. Cornea. 2000;19(5):754–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frueh BE, Böhnke M. Prospective, randomized clinical evaluation of Optisol vs organ culture corneal storage media. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(6):757–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armitage WJ, Easty DL. Factors influencing the suitability of organ-cultured corneas for transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(1):16–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rijneveld WJ, Remeijer L, van Rij G, Beekhuis H, Pels E. Prospective clinical evaluation of McCarey–Kaufman and organ culture cornea preservation media: 14-Year Follow-up. Cornea. 2008;27(9):996–1000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiffen SJ, Weston BC, Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. The value of routine donor corneal rim cultures in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(6):719–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilhelmus KR, Stulting D, Sugar J, Khan MM. Primary corneal graft failure. A national reporting system. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(12):1497–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim T, Palay DA, Lynn M. Donor factors associated with epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1996;15(5):451–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salvalaio G, Fasolo A, Bruni A, Frigo AC, Favaro E, Ponzin D. Improved preparation and preservation of human keratoplasty lenticules. Ophthalmic Res. 2003;35(6):301–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parekh M, Ferrari S, Salvalaio G, Ponzin D. Synthetic versus Serum based medium for corneal preservation in organ culture: a comparative study between two different media. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(2):96–100.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Camposampiero D, Tiso R, Zanetti E, Ruzza A, Bruni A, Ponzin D. Cornea preservation in culture with bovine serum or chicken ovalbumin. Cornea. 2003;22(3):254–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ide T, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, et al. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of anterior lamellar corneal tissue-on/-off storage condition on Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor tissue. Cornea. 2008;27(7):754–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rose L, Briceno CA, Start WJ, et al. Assessment of eye bank prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):279–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terry MA. Precut tissue for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: complications are from technique, not tissue. Cornea. 2008;27(6):627–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Busin M, Scorcia V, Patel AK, Salvalaio G, Ponzin D. Pneumatic dissection and storage of donor endothelial tissue for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a novel technique. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(8):1517–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parekh M, Ruzza A, Salvalaio G, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation from donor corneas using a standardized submerged hydro-separation method. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(2):277–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruzza A, Parekh M, Salvalaio G, Ferrari S, Camposampiero D, Ponzin D. Bubble technique for DMEK tissue preparation in the eye bank: air or liquid? Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(2):e129–34Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrari S, Barbaro V, Di Iorio E, Fasolo A, Ponzin D. Advances in corneal surgery and cell therapy: challenges and perspectives for the eye banks. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2009;4(3):317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Ponzin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gianni Salvalaio
    • 1
  • Alessandro Ruzza
    • 1
  • Mohit Parekh
    • 1
  • Stefano Ferrari
    • 1
  1. 1.International Center for Ocular Physiopathology (ICOP)Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto OnlusMestreItaly

Personalised recommendations