Skip to main content

Incremental Dependency Parsing and Disfluency Detection in Spoken Learner English

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9302))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates the suitability of state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) tools for parsing the spoken language of second language learners of English. The task of parsing spoken learner-language is important to the domains of automated language assessment (ALA) and computer-assisted language learning (CALL). Due to the non-canonical nature of spoken language (containing filled pauses, non-standard grammatical variations, hesitations and other disfluencies) and compounded by a lack of available training data, spoken language parsing has been a challenge for standard NLP tools. Recently the Redshift parser (Honnibal et al. In: Proceedings of CoNLL (2013)) has been shown to be successful in identifying grammatical relations and certain disfluencies in native speaker spoken language, returning unlabelled dependency accuracy of 90.5% and a disfluency F-measure of 84.1% (Honnibal & Johnson: TACL 2, 131-142 (2014)). We investigate how this parser handles spoken data from learners of English at various proficiency levels. Firstly, we find that Redshift’s parsing accuracy on non-native speech data is comparable to Honnibal & Johnson’s results, with 91.1% of dependency relations correctly identified. However, disfluency detection is markedly down, with an F-measure of just 47.8%. We attempt to explain why this should be, and investigate the effect of proficiency level on parsing accuracy. We relate our findings to the use of NLP technology for CALL and ALA applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballesteros, M., Nivre, J.: Going to the roots of dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics 39(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biber, D.: Dimensions of register variation: a cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Brazil, D.: A grammar of speech. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bresnan, J.: Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Briscoe, T., Carroll, J., Watson, R.: The second release of the RASP System. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentations Session. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchholz, S., Marsi, E.: CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X). Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caines, A., Bentz, C., Graham, C., Polzehl, T., Buttery, P.: Crowdsourcing a multi-lingual speech corpus: recording, transcription, and natural language processing. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2015. International Speech Communication Association (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caines, A., Buttery, P.: The effect of disfluencies and learner errors on the parsing of spoken learner language. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages and Syntactic Analysis of Non-Canonical Languages (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter, R., McCarthy, M.: Spoken Grammar: where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charniak, E., Johnson, M.: Edit detection and parsing for transcribed speech. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL). Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Council of Europe: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foster, J., Çetinoǧlu, Ö., Wagner, J., Roux, J.L., Nivre, J., Hogan, D., van Genabith, J.: From news to comment: resources and benchmarks for parsing the language of Web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Godfrey, J., Holliman, E.: Switchboard-1 Release 2 LDC97S62. DVD (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Godfrey, J.J., Holliman, E.C., McDaniel, J.: SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development. In: Proceedings of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 1992). IEEE (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Honnibal, M., Goldberg, Y., Johnson, M.: A non-monotonic arc-eager transition system for dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Honnibal, M., Johnson, M.: Joint incremental disfluency detection and dependency parsing. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2, 131–142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hovy, D., Plank, B., Søgaard, A.: When POS data sets don’t add up: combatting sample bias. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). European Language Resources Association (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, M., Charniak, E.: A TAG-based noisy channel model of speech repairs. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. KĂĽbler, S., McDonald, R., Nivre, J.: Dependency parsing. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lease, M., Charniak, E.: Parsing biomedical literature. In: Dale, R., Wong, K.-F., Su, J., Kwong, O.Y. (eds.) IJCNLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3651, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. de Marneffe, M.C., MacCartney, B., Manning, C.D.: Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). European Language Resources Association (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Marneffe, M.C., Manning, C.D.: The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Proceedings of the COLING Workshop on Cross-framework and Cross-domain Parser Evaluation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mikheev, A.: Text segmentation. In: Mitkov, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nivre, J.: Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics 34(4), 513–553 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Qian, X., Liu, Y.: Disfluency detection using multi-step stacked learning. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT). Association for Computational Linguistics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rasooli, M.S., Tetreault, J.: Non-monotonic parsing of Fluent umm I Mean disfluent sentences. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2014). Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rimell, L., Clark, S.: Porting a lexicalized-grammar parser to the biomedical domain. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42, 852–865 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shriberg, E.: Preliminaries to a theory of speech disfluencies. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor, A., Marcus, M., Santorini, B.: The Penn Treebank: An Overview (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Y., Clark, S.: Syntactic processing using the generalized perceptron and beam search. Computational Linguistics 37(1), 105–151 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, Y., Nivre, J.: Transition-based dependency parsing with rich non-local features. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL-HLT). Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Caines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moore, R., Caines, A., Graham, C., Buttery, P. (2015). Incremental Dependency Parsing and Disfluency Detection in Spoken Learner English. In: Král, P., Matoušek, V. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9302. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24033-6_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24033-6_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24032-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24033-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics