Coincidence of Opposites in the Thought of Nicolas Cusanus and Niels Bohr

  • John R. AlbrightEmail author
Part of the Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology book series (ESSSAT)


Although they lived nearly 500 years apart, Nicholas of Cusa (Cusanus) and Niels Bohr have a certain commonality. They both maintained that opposite ideas are not always incompatible, but are often complementary. Cusanus called this the coincidence of opposites; Bohr called it complementarity. This essay reviews the lives of these two intellectual leaders and outlines how their devotion to their guiding principle led them to understanding in various fields. For Cusanus, the topic was conciliarism versus papalism. For Bohr, the initial impetus was to resolve the paradox of waves and particles. He later branched into issues such as determinism versus uncertainty, discreet versus continuous models of the nucleus, secrecy versus openness, and objectivity versus subjectivity.


Nicholas of Cusa Cusanus Niels Bohr Coincidence of opposites Paradox Wave/particle Papalism Conciliarism Determinism/uncertainty Learned ignorance Yin/yang 


  1. Bohr, Niels. 1987. The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr, four volumes. Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chaucer, Geoffrey. C. 1380. The house of fame. Google Scholar
  3. Nicholas of Cusa. 1997. Selected Spiritual Writings. Trans. E. Lawrence Bond. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  4. Plotnitsky, Arkady. 1994. Complementarity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Valliere, Paul. 2012. Conciliarism: A history of decision-making in the church. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lutheran School of Theology at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations