Advertisement

Post-prostatectomy Incontinence Initial Evaluation

  • Raveen Syan
  • Victor W. NittiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is one of the most common complications following radical prostatectomy. The incidence of urinary incontinence has a large reported range, from 2 to 87 % [1]. By understanding the risk factors and the pathophysiology of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), patients can be risk stratified for long-term voiding dysfunction that may require intervention. There are currently a number of options available for Urologists to offer patients to manage this incontinence, dependent upon the type and degree of incontinence and its effect on quality of life. For this reason, a thorough and detailed evaluation is important in all patients, which includes a detailed history and physical exam as well as specific diagnostic tests, when appropriate. It is equally important to avoid unnecessary diagnostic tests that do not aid in management of a particular patient.

Keywords

Pathophysiology Risk factors History Urodynamics Cystoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1317–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nitti VW, Mourtzinos A, Brucker BM. SUFU Pad Test Study Group. Correlation of patient perception of pad use with objective degree of incontinence measured by pad test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: the SUFU Pad Test Study. J Urol. 2014;192(3):836–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D, et al. Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2000;163:858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A. Incontinence. 5th ed. Paris, France: European Association of Urology - International Consultation on Incontinence; 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moinzadeh A, Shunaigat AN, Libertino JA. Urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the outcome of a surgical technique. BJU Int. 2003;92:355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient- reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;55:58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar A, Nitti VW. Contemporary incidence of postprostatectomy incontinence and impact on health-related quality of life. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2010;5:135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol. 2005;173:1701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goluboff ET, Saidi JA, Mazer S, et al. Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the Columbia experience. J Urol. 1998;159:1276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA. Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urol. 2007;7:2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vickers AJ, Kent M, Mulhall J, Sandhu J. Counseling the post-radical prostatectomy patients about functional recovery: high predictiveness of current status. Urology. 2014;84(1):158–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider T, Sperling H, Rossi R, Schmidt S, Rübben H. Do early injections of bulking agents following radical prostatectomy improve early continence? World J Urol. 2005;23(5):338–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones JS, Vasavada SP, Abdelmalak JB. Sling may hasten return of continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65(6):1163–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosling JA, Dixon JS, Critchley HO, Thompson SA. A comparative study of the human external sphincter and periurethral levator ani muscles. Br J Urol. 1981;53:35–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, et al. The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1767–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gudziak MR, McGuire EJ, Gormley EA. Urodynamic assessment of urethral sphincter function in post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1996;156(3):1131–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desautel MG, Kapoor R, Badlani GH. Sphincteric incontinence: the primary cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence in patients with prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16(3):153–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winters JC, Appell RA, Rackley RR. Urodynamic findings in postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998;17(5):493–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Twiss C, Fleischmann N, Nitti VW. Correlation of abdominal leak point pressure with objective incontinence severity in men with post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(3):207–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Di Stasi SM, et al. Assessment of bladder and urethral sphincter function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1563–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reis RB, Cologna AJ, Machado RD, et al. Lack of association between the ICIQ-SF questionnaire and the urodynamic diagnosis in men with post radical prostatectomy incontinence. Acta Cir Bras. 2013;28 Suppl 1:37–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fowler Jr FJ, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G, Wasson J, Roman A, Wennberg J. Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey. Urology. 1995;45(6):1007–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Collado SA, Rubio-Briones J, Pyol Payas M, Iborra Juan I, Ramon-Borja JC, Solsona NE. Postprostatectomy established stress urinary incontinence treated with duloxetine. Urology. 2011;78:261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Steineck G, et al. Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol. 2013;47(4):272–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):413–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, D’elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 1999;162(2):433–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H. Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(1):208–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu T, Wang X, Xia L, et al. robot-assisted prostatectomy in obese patients: how influential is obesity on operative outcomes? J Endourol. 2015;29:198–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, et al. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol. 1994;152(5 Pt. 2):1850–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petrovich Z, Lieskovsky G, Langholz B, et al. Comparison of outcomes of radical prostatectomy with and without adjuvant pelvic irradiation in patients with pathologic stage C (T3N0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Clin Oncol. 1999;22(4):323–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen PL, D’Amico AV, Lee AK, Suh WW. Patient selection, cancer control, and complications after salvage local therapy for postradiation prostate-specific antigen failure: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer. 2007;110(7):1417–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H. Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;158:1470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D. Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology. 1999;53:881.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL. A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2000;85(1):95–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Froehner M, Koch R, Leike S, Novotny V, Twelker L, Wirth MP. Urinary tract-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy: open retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int. 2013;90(1):36–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Joniau S, Van Kampen M. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013;112(7):936–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104:991–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol. 2011;59:1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103:448–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Srougi M, Nesrallah LJ, Kauffmann JR, Nesrallah A, Leite KR. Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. J Urol. 2001;165:815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad DBR, Rsai C, Webster R, Lui P. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction. J Urol. 2000;163:194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy-does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol. 2006;179:189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nandipati KC, Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe CD. Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;70:1127–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Choi WW, Freire MP, Soukup JR, et al. Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2011;29:21–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Srivastava A, Chopra S, Pham A, et al. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;63:38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marien TP, Lepor H. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2008;102:1581–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tzou DT, Dalkin BL, Christopher BA, Cui H. The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design. Urol Oncol. 2009;27:358–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Peterson AC, Chen Y. Patient reported incontinence after radical prostatectomy is more common than expected and not associated with the nerve sparing technique: results from the Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR) Database. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:60–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Radomski SB. Practical evaluation of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(9–10 Suppl 4):S186–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mungovan SF, Huijbers BP, Hirschhorn AD, Patel MI. What makes men leak? An investigation of objective and self-report measures of urinary incontinence early after radical prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014. doi: 10.1002/nau.22701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy. Rev Urol. 2004;6(4):180–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR et al. EAU Guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Assoc Urol 2014, update April 2014Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Svatek R, Roche V, Thornberg J, Zimmern P. Normative values for the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-7) and short form Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in patients 65 and older presenting for non-urological care. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):606–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bayoud Y, de la Taille A, Ouzzane A, et al. International Prostate Symptom Score is a predictive factor of lower urinary tract symptoms after radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2015;22:283–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, ICIQ Advisory Board. The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):1063–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ogunyemi TO, Siadat MR, Arslanturk S, Killinger KA, Diokno AC. Novel application of statistical methods to identify new urinary incontinence risk factors. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:p1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors, and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2006;97:1234–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tsui JF, Shah MB, Weinberger JM, et al. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2013;190(5):1787–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bettez M, Tu LM, Carlson K, et al. CUA Guideline 2012 Update: guidelines for Adult Urinary Incontinence Collaborative Consensus Document for the Canadian Urological Association. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(5):354–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dmochowski RR, Blaivas JM, Gormley EA, et al. Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1906–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tuygun C, Imamoglu A, Keyik B, Alisir I, Yorubulut M. Significance of fibrosis around and/or at external urinary sphincter on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2006;68(6):1308–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):629–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Thiel DD, Young PR, Broderick GA, et al. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Urology. 2007;69(2):315–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Soljanik I, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Urodynamic parameters after retrourethral transobturator male sling and their influence on outcome. Urology. 2011;78(3):708–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ballert KN, Nitti VW. Association between detrusor overactivity and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing male bone anchored perineal sling. J Urol. 2010;183(2):641–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pérez LM, Webster GD. Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1166–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lai HH, Hsu EI, Boone TB. Urodynamic testing in evaluation of postradical prostatectomy incontinence before artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2009;73(6):1264–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Huckabay C, Twiss C, Berger A, Nitti VW. A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):622–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline 2014 update. The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. 2014 Linthicum, Maryland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyNYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyObstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations