Skip to main content

The University in the Polis: An Emerging Role of Democratic Intermediary in e-Participation?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 11))

Abstract

e-participation enables citizens’ voices to be heard more clearly and frequently, but does not self-implement. Strategies should be planned, models should be followed, the public actor should encourage administrative and political changes. In this paper the well established OECD levels of engagement (information, consultation, public participation) are described, with reference to enabling digital technologies: a need of trustworthy intermediaries emerges. This conceptual framework drives the presentation of some experiences that recently took place in the city of Genoa, highlighting the emerging role of the university as a democratic intermediary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.mysociety.org.

  2. 2.

    www.fondazionercm.it.

  3. 3.

    To echo the Not In My Back Yard syndrome.

  4. 4.

    Mary Kaldor, Opening Speech World Forum for Democracy, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, November 2013.

  5. 5.

    This is not dissimilar from a participatory process in presence, taking place in areas which are difficult to reach by citizens; in this case it would be possible to introduce the idea of a physical divide for in presence participatory processes.

  6. 6.

    The conventional symbols (e.g. emoticons) used to substitute for this deficiency have limited efficacy compared to non-verbal communication in presence.

  7. 7.

    http://www.urbancenter.comune.genova.it/.

  8. 8.

    https://it-it.facebook.com/citta.genova.

  9. 9.

    http://www.asplgenova.it/.

  10. 10.

    Let us recall for example the early initiative on road safety held in Milan in 2008 (http://www.sicurezzastradale.partecipami.it), the Internet Reporting System launched in Venice in May 2008 (http://iris.comune.venezia.it) which collected since then 20392 reports, and the experience of Udine (http://www.epart.it/udine) based on the custom technology ePart for urban maintenance, well integrated in the website of the municipality.

  11. 11.

    The University of Genoa, with he help of the Civic Informatics Laboratory of the University of Milan and of the RCM Foundation.

  12. 12.

    http://www.comunaligenova2012.it, now archived at http://comunaligenova2012.opendcn.org/.

  13. 13.

    http://www.opengenova.org/.

  14. 14.

    From the administrative point of view, the city of Genoa is divided into nine municipalities, each one corresponding to a different area in the town.

References

  1. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellezza, E., Florian, F.: Le fondazioni del terzo millennio. Pubblico e privato per il non-profit. Passigli editori (1998) (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertot, J., Jaeger, P., Hansen, D.: The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Govern. Inf. Q. 29(1), 30–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobbio, L.: Prove di democrazia deliberativa. Parole chiave 43,185–203 (2011) (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caddy, J., Vergez, C.: Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. OECD Publishing, Ottawa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman, S., Blumer, J.: The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Concilio, G., De Bonis, L., Marsh, J., Trapani, F.: Urban smartness: perspectives arising in the Periphéria project. J.Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 205–216 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Cindio, F.: Guidelines for designing deliberative digital habitats: learning from e-participation for open data initiatives. J. Commun. Inf. 2(8) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Cindio, F., Di Loreto, I., Peraboni, C.: Moments and modes for triggering civic participation at the urban level, pp. 97–113. Information Science Reference, IGI Global, Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Cindio, F., Gentile, O., Grew, P., Redolfi, D.: Community networks: rules of behavior and social structure. Inf. Soc. 19(5), 395–406 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Cindio, F., Krzatala-Jaworska, E., Sonnante, L.: Problems&Proposals, a tool for collecting citizens’ intelligence. In: CSCW2012 Workshop on Collective Intelligence as Community Discourse and Action, Seattle (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards, A.R.: The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: the role of the moderator in internet discussions about public issues. Info. Pol. 7(1) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hollands, R.: Will the real smart city please standup? City Anal. Urban Trends Cult. Theory Policy Action 12(3), 303–320 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. House, E., Howe, K.: Deliberative democratic evaluation. In: Ryan, E., De Stefano, L. (eds.) Evaluation as a Democratic Process, New Directions for Program Evaluation, vol. 85. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palumbo, M., Torrigiani, C.: Participatory evaluation in the field of social policies: why, who, what, where, how and when. Working Paper Series, FPeV 25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pastore, V.: Si fa presto a dire valutazione. Una riflessione su attori, finalità, tecniche e strumenti. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione 4, 73–108 (2010). In Italian

    Google Scholar 

  18. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-MartÃ-nez, I., Luna-Reyes, L.: Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Govern. Inf. Q. 29(4), 504–511 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pizzorno, A.: (1978). Political exchange and collective identity in industrial conflict. In: Crouch, C., Pizzorno, A. (eds.) The resurgence of class conflict in Western Europe since 1968, vol. 2, pp. 277–298. London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Senato della Repubblica. I media civici in ambito parlamentare (2013) (in Italian). http://www.senato.it/service/PDF/PDFServer/BGT/00739736.pdf

  21. Torrigiani, C.: Partecipazione e valutazione partecipata. In: Palumbo, M., Torrigiani, C. (eds.) La partecipazione tra ricerca e valutazione, pp. 112–134. Franco Angeli (2009) (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wiedemann, P., Femers, S.: Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management of conflicts. J. Hazard. Mater. 33(3), 355–368 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Ribaudo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ribaudo, M., Torrigiani, C., De Cindio, F., Palumbo, M. (2016). The University in the Polis: An Emerging Role of Democratic Intermediary in e-Participation?. In: Torre, T., Braccini, A., Spinelli, R. (eds) Empowering Organizations. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics