Designing e-Sustainable Parliaments

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 11)


Parliaments are seeking legitimacy as responsive and sustainable institutions engaging citizens in the policy process by embracing Internet technologies. Social sustainability relies on participation of citizens and knowledge emerging through interaction. Parliaments as information and knowledge based organizations select different choices for sustainability structuring the e-parliament along a continuum between improving processes and engaging citizens from information provision to active citizenship.


e-parliament e-participation Social sustainability 


  1. 1.
    McKenzie, S.: Social sustainability: toward some definitions. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 27, Hawke Research Institute, Magill (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denhardt, R.B., Denhardt, V.J.: The new public service: putting democracy first. Nat. Civic Rev. 90, 391–400 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48, 147–160 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fox, H.W., Hammond, S.W.: Congressional Staffs: Invisible Force in American lawmaking. The Free Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suchmann, M.C.: Managing legitimacy; strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 571–610 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IPU: Guidelines for Parliamentary Websites (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 400–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leston Bandeira, C.: Are ICTs changing parliamentary activity in the portuguese parliament? J. Legislative Stud. 13, 403–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, C., Webster, W.R.: The emergent ICT culture of parliamentarians: the case of the Scottish parliament. Information Polity. 13, 249–273 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffith, J., Leston-Bandeira, C.: How are parliaments using new media to engage with citizens? J Legislative Stud. 18, 496–513 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oppd: Information and Communication Technologies in Parliament. Tools for democracy, European Parliament, Bruxelles (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    AA, VV.: World Parliamentary Report. NU (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suurla, R., Mustajarvi, O., Markkula, M.: Developing and Implementing Knowledge Management in the Parliament of Finland. Oy Edita Ab, Helsinki (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chimenti, C.: Gli apparati delle camere. Quad. Costituzionali 3, 573–580 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leston-Bandeira, C.: The impact of the internet on Parliaments: a legislative studies framework. Parliamentary Aff. 60, 255–274 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mulder, B.: Parliamentary Futures: re-presenting the issue information, technology and dynamics of information. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 553–556 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geczi, E.: Sustainability and public participation: toward an inclusive model of democracy. Adm. Theor. Prax. 29, 375–393 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Macintosh, A.: characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaiii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    AA, VV.: World Parliamentary Report. NU (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al-Sudairy, M.A.T., Vasista, T.G.K.: Fostering Knowledge Management and Citizen Participation via E-Governance for Achieving Sustainable Balanced Development, pp. 52–64 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lusoli, W., Ward, S., Gibson, R.: (Re)connecting politics? Parliament, the public and the internet. Parliamentary Aff. 59, 24–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raab, C.D., Bellamy, C.: Electronic democracy and the ‘mixed polity’. Symbiosis or conflict? In: Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 17–42. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dai, X., Norton, Ph.: The internet and parliamentary democracy in Europe. J. Legislative Stud. 13, 343–353 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coleman, S., Taylor, J.A., Van De Donk, W.: Parliament in the age of internet. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 365–370 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coleman, S., Spiller, J.: Exploring new media effects on representative democracy. J. Legislative Stud. 9, 1–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zittel, T.A.: Digital parliaments and electronic democracy: a comparison between the US House, Swedish Riksdag and the German Bundestag. In: Gibson R., Römmele A., Ward S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 70–95. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S.: Introduction. Representative democracy and the Internet. In: Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 1–16. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Päivärinta, T., Sæbø, Ø.: Models of e-democracy. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 818–840 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loukis, E.: Using advanced information technologies for increasing public participation in the Greek parliament. J. Balkan Near Eastern Stud. 13, 14–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Riege, A., Linsday, N.: Knowledge management in public sector. J. Knowl. Manage. 10, 24–39 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McDermott, R.: Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Calif. Manage. Rev. 41, 103–117 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Blumentritt, R., Johnston, R.: Towards a strategy for knowledge management. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 11, 287–300 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kingham, T.: e-Parliaments. The use of information and communication technologies to improve parliamentary processes. WBI, Working Papers (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Papaloi, A., Gouscos, D.: E-parliaments and novel parliament-to-citizens services. JeDEM 3, 80–98 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    De Rosa, R.: Il Parlamento Italiano alla prova tecnologica. Politica del Diritto. 3, 545–569Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Trechsel, A.H., Kies, R., Mendez, R., Schmitter, Ph. C.: Evaluation of the Use of New Technologies in Order to Facilitate Democracy in Europe, EP, (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rose, J., Sanford, C.: Mapping eParticipation research: four central challenges. Commun. AIS 20, 909–943 (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taylor, J.A., Burt, E.: Parliaments on the web: learning through innovation. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 503–517 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ona, S.: Exploring the use of new technologies in participation practices in legislation. J. E-Gov. 36, 79–91 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berntzen, L., Healy, M., Hahamis, P., Dunville, D., Esteves, J.: Parliamentary web presence: a comparative review. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on e-Government, pp. 17–25. (ICEG 2006) Pittsburgh (2006)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Loukis, E., Xenakis, A.: Evaluating parliamentary e-participation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Third International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), London (2008)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Papaloi, A., Ravekka Staiou, E., Gouscos, D.: Blending social media with parliamentary websites: just a trend, or a promising approach to e-participation? In: Reddick, Ch. G., Aikins, S.K. (eds.) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications, pp. 259–275. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Missingham, R.: E-parliament: opening the door. Gov. Inf. Q. 28, 426–434 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    OECD: Promise and problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Oecd, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pratchett, L.: Comparing local e-democracy in europe: a preliminary report. In: DESA: E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future, pp. 128–146. UN, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A framework for assessing eparticipation projects and tools. In: Proceedings of 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 1–10. (HICCS-40), Hawaii (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marcella, R., Baxter, G., Moore, N.: An exploration of the effectiveness for the citizen of Web-based systems of communicating UK parliamentary and devolved assembly information. J. Gov. Inf. 29, 371–391 (2002)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sobaci, Z.: What the Turkish parliamentary web site offers to citizens in terms of e-participation: a content analysis. Inf. Polity 15, 227–241 (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Setälä, M., Grönlund, K.: Parliamentary websites: theoretical and comparative perspectives. Inf. Polity 11, 149–162 (2006)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Coleman, S.: Connecting Parliament to the public via the internet: two case studies of online consultations. Inf. Commun. Soc. 7, 1–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hough, R.: Do legislative petitions systems enhance the relationship between parliament and citizens? J. Legislative Stud. 18, 479–495 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miller, L.: E-petitions at Westminster: the way forward for democracy? Parliamentary Aff. 62, 162–177 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Malina, A., Macintosh, A., Farrell, S.: Digital democracy through electronic petitioning. Adv. Digit. Gov. 26, 137–148 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bochel, C.: Petition systems. contributing to representative democracy? Parliamentary Aff. 66, 798–815 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. JeDEM 1, 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mambrey, P., Neumann, H.-P., Sieverdingbeck, K.: Bridging the gap between parliament and citizen? the internet services of the german Bundestag. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 480–492 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Saalfeld, T., Dobmeier, R.: The Bundestag and german citizens: more communication growing distance. J. Legislative Stud. 18, 314–333 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Islam, M.S.: Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. Eur. J. ePractice 5, 1–12 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Napoli ParthenopeDipartimento di Studi Aziendali ed EconomiciNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations