Mt.Gox Is Dead, Long Live Bitcoin!

Analysis of the Rise and Fall of a Leading Virtual Currency Exchange Platform
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 11)


In the last decade the intensity and frequency of business and social interactions mediated by digital channels have dramatically increased. Participating in virtual communities, communicating via internet, buying product and services through the web is part of our daily behavior. It is not a surprise the tremendous expansion that virtual currencies are experiencing. Virtual currency exchange platforms (VCEP), specialized in trading virtual currency are becoming increasingly popular. The combination of these two concepts calls for a deeper understanding of their value and models both from an organizational and an information system perspective. We investigate Mt.Gox, one of the most popular VCEP, trading till 70 % of Bitcoin transactions in 2013, and suddenly collapsing as consequence of managerial choices and cyber-attacks. We explore this case study in order to understand the value and the risks associated to the system and the consequences of the breakdown of one of the most important player.


Virtual currency E-currency Bitcoin Mt.gox Exchange platform Exchange market Hacker Cyber attack 


  1. 1.
    Bolici, F.: Organizzare in Rete. McGraw-Hill Education, Italy (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hilbert, M., López, P.: The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science 332(6025), 60–65 (2011)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castells, M.: Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society 1. Br. J. Sociol. 51(1), 5–24 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2), 198–213 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majchrzak, A., Rice, R.E., Malhotra, A., King, N., Ba, S.: Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Q. 24(4), 569–600 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., Gibson, C.B.: The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad. Manage. J. 47(2), 175–192 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.: Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage. Wiley, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, J., Bell, D.R., Lodish, L.M.: Traditional and IS-enabled customer acquisition on the internet. Manage. Sci. 58(4), 754–769 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Central Bank. Virtual Currency Schemes. European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main (2012). ISBN 978-92-899-0862-7. Archived from the original on 2014-07-15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    EBA Opinion on virtual currencies. European Banking Authority. 4 July 2014. Accessed 18 July 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Network, Financial Crimes Enforcement. Application of FinCEN’s regulations to persons administering, exchanging, or using virtual currencies. United States Department of the Treasury, March 18 (2013). Accessed 18 July 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers, M.D., Avison, D.: An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. Qual. Res. Inf. Syst. 4, 3–12 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerring, J.: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodkinson, P., Hodkinson, H.: The strengths and limitations of case study research. Learning and Skills Development Agency Conference at Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    CPSS.: A Glossary of Terms Used in Payments and Settlement Systems. CPSS-Committee on Payment (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    BIS Bank for International Settlements: Principles for the Management of Credit Risk. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel, September (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nikolaou, K.: European Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 1008 February (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufman, G.G.: Banking and currency crisis and systemic risk: a taxonomy and review. Financ. Markets Institutions Instrum. 9(2), 69–131 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chong, J., Jennings, W.P., Phillips, G.M.: Five types of risk and a fistful of dollars: practical risk analysis for investors. J. Financ. Serv. Prof. 66(3), 68–76 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Baddeley, M.: Using e-cash in the new economy: an economic analysis of micro-payment systems. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 5(4), 239–253 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karame, G., Androulaki, E., Capkun, S.: Double-spending fast payments in Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of ACM CCS 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosenfeld, M.: Analysis of hashrate-based double-spending (2012).
  25. 25.
    Reid, F., Harrigan, M.: An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system. In: Security and Privacy in Social Networks, pp. 197–223. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Becker, J., Breuker, D., Heide, T., Holler, J., Rauer, H.P., Böhme, R.: Can we afford integrity by proof-of-work? Scenarios inspired by the Bitcoin currency. The Economics of Information Security and Privacy, pp. 135–156. Springer Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Stabell, C.B., Fjeldstad, Ø.D.: Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(5), 413–437 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Nagano, Y., Wright, S.: Website of Bitcoin Exchange Mt.Gox Offline. Associated Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takemoto, Y.; Knight, S.: Mt.Gox files for bankruptcy, blames hackers for losses. Reuters (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Bolici, F., Giustiniano, L.: Design Science and eTrust: Designing Organizational Artifacts as Nexus of Social and Technical Interactions. Organizational Change and Information Systems, pp. 177–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Androulaki, E., Karame, G.O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., Capkun, S.: Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 34–51. Springer Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A.D.: Zerocoin: anonymous distributed e-cash from Bitcoin. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and privacy (SP). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moore, T., Christin N.: Beware the middleman: empirical analysis of Bitcoin-exchange risk. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 25–33. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Plassaras, N.A.: Regulating digital currencies: bringing bitcoin within the reach of the IMF. Chicago J. Int. Law 14(1), 377–407 (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ron, D., Shamir, A.: Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 6–24. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OrgLab, Department of Economics and Law, UniClamCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations