Skip to main content

Abstract

After briefly outlining the significant advantages offered by CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillators, a variety of prominent single-resistance-controlled oscillators (SRCO) have been described which include single CFOA-based SRCOs, two-CFOA-two-grounded-capacitor-based SRCOs, quadrature SRCOs, active-R SRCOs, SRCOs with explicit current output, and fully-uncoupled SRCOs. Also included are a variety of voltage-controlled oscillators (VCO) using CFOAs, employing FET-based VCOs as well as analog multiplier (AM)-based VCOs. Various characteristic features and advantages of all the discussed topologies have been highlighted and a number of ideas for further research have been pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The circuit of Fig. 5.3a has also been derived independently in [24].

  2. 2.

    Many more variants of the 14 basic oscillators, obtained by using some transformations, terminal interchanges, etc., have been described in [78].

  3. 3.

    It is interesting to point out that although not explicitly mentioned in [10], this circuit can be considered to be derivable from a two-op-amp-GC SRCO published earlier in [18] by realizing the negative-impedance converter (NIC) therein by a CFOA without requiring any resistors and thereby simplifying the circuit as shown in Fig. 5.9.

  4. 4.

    In spite of the criticism of [30], the class of circuits described in this section is interesting and important in their own right.

References

  1. Celma S, Martinez PA, Carlosena A (1994) Current feedback amplifiers based sinusoidal oscillators. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 41:906–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez PA, Celma S, Sabadell J (1996) Designing sinusoidal oscillators with current-feedback amplifiers. Int J Electron 80:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Senani R, Singh VK (1996) Comment: synthesis of canonic single-resistance-controlled-oscillators using a single current-feedback-amplifier. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 143:71–72

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Senani R (1998) Realization of a class of analog signal processing/signal generation circuits: novel configurations using current feedback op-amps. Frequenz 52:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soliman AM (1996) Applications of current feedback operational amplifiers. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 11:265–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Celma S, Martinez PA, Carlosena A (1994) Approach to the synthesis of canonic RC-active oscillators using CCII. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 141:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh VK, Sharma RK, Singh AK, Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2005) Two new canonic single-CFOA oscillators with single resistor controls. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II 2:860–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu SI, Shih CS, Wu DS (1994) Sinusoidal oscillators with single element control using a current-feedback amplifier. Int J Electron 77:1007–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abuelma’atti MT, Farooqi AA, Al-Shahrani SM (1996) Novel RC oscillators using the current-feedback operational amplifier. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 43:155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu SI, Tsay JH (1996) Single-resistance-controlled sinusoidal oscillator using current feedback amplifiers. Int J Electron 80:661–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani SM (1996) A novel low-component count single-element-controlled sinusoidal oscillator using the CFOA pole. Int J Electron 80:747–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani SM (1997) New CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillators. Int J Electron 82:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Senani R, Singh VK (1996) Novel single-resistance-controlled-oscillator configuration using current feedback amplifiers. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 43:698–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abuelma’atti MT, Farooqi AA (1996) A novel single-element controlled oscillator using the current-feedback-operational amplifier pole. Frequenz 50:183–184

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toker A, Cicekoglu O, Kuntman H (2002) On the oscillator implementations using a single current feedback op-amp. Comput Electr Eng 28:375–389

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gunes EO, Toker A (2002) On the realization of oscillators using state equations. Int J Electron Commun 56:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Senani R (1994) Realization of linear voltage-controlled resistance in floating form. Electron Lett 30:1909–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Senani R (1980) Novel sinusoidal oscillator employing grounded capacitors. Electron Lett 16:62–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez PA, Sabadell J, Aldea C (1997) Grounded resistor controlled sinusoidal oscillator using CFOAs. Electron Lett 33:346–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez PA, Sanz BMM (2005) Generation of two integrator loop variable frequency sinusoidal oscillator. Int J Electron 92:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tangsrirat W, Surakampontorn W (2009) Single-resistance-controlled quadrature oscillator and universal biquad filter using CFOAs. Int J Electron Commun 63:1080–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hou CL, Wang WY (1997) Circuit transformation method from OTA-C circuits into CFA-based RC circuits. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 144:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu DS, Liu SI, Hwang YS, Wu YP (1995) Multiphase sinusoidal oscillator using the CFOA pole. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 142:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani AM (1998) Novel CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillators. Int J Electron 85:437–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu SI, Chang CC, Wu DS (1994) Active-R sinusoidal oscillator using the CFA pole. Int J Electron 77:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani SM (1997) New CFOA-based grounded-capacitor single-element-controlled sinusoidal oscillator. Active Passive Electron Comp 20:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Senani R, Gupta SS (1997) Synthesis of single-resistance-controlled oscillators using CFOAs: simple state-variable approach. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 144:104–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta SS, Senani R (1998) State variable synthesis of single-resistance-controlled grounded capacitor oscillator oscillators using only two CFOAs. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 145:135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta SS, Senani R (1998) State variable synthesis of single-resistance-controlled grounded capacitor oscillator oscillators using only two CFOAs: additional new realizations. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 145:415–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmid H (2003) Why ‘Current Mode’ does not guarantee good performance. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 35:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Zaher HA (1998) New grounded-capacitor sinusoidal oscillators using the current-feedback-amplifier pole. Active Passive Electron Comp 21:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh VK (2004) Realization of a class of Analog Signal Processing/Signal Generation Circuits. Ph.D. Thesis, Uttar Pradesh Technical University, Lucknow, India

    Google Scholar 

  33. Elwakil AS (1998) Systematic realization of low-frequency oscillators using composite passive-active resistors. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 47:584–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Soliman AM (2000) Current feedback operational amplifier based oscillators. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 23:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh AK, Senani R (2001) Active-R design using CFOA-poles: new resonators, filters and oscillators. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II 48:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhaskar DR (2003) Realization of second-order sinusoidal oscillator/filters with non-interacting controls using CFAs. Frequenz 57:12–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani SM (2003) Synthesis of a novel low-component programmable sinusoidal oscillator. Active Passive Electron Comp 26:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhaskar DR, Prasad D, Imam SA (2004) Grounded-capacitor SRCOs realized through a simple general scheme. Frequenz 58:175–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Senani R, Sharma RK (2005) Explicit-current-output sinusoidal oscillators employing only a single current-feedback op-amp. IEICE Electron Expr 2:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2006) New CFOA-based single-element-controlled sinusoidal oscillators. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 55:2014–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nandi R (2008) Tunable active-R oscillator using a CFA. IEICE Electron Expr 5:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta SS, Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2009) New voltage controlled oscillators using CFOAs. Int J Electron Commun 63:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Shahrani SM (1997) A minimum component grounded-capacitor CFOA-based RC oscillator. Active Passive Electron Comp 19:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Soliman AM (2010) Transformation of Oscillators using Op amps, unity gain cells and CFOA. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 65:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gupta SS, Sharma RK, Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2010) Sinusoidal oscillators with explicit current output employing current-feedback op-amps. Int J Circ Theory Appl 38:131–147

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Soliman AM (2011) Transformation of a floating capacitor oscillator to a family of grounded capacitor oscillators. Int J Electron 98:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Abuelmaatti MT (2010) Identification of a class of two CFOA-based sinusoidal RC oscillators. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 65:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wangenheim LV (2011) Comment on ‘Identification of a class of two CFOA-based sinusoidal RC oscillators’. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 67:117–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abuelma’atti MT (2012) Reply to comment on “Identification of class of two CFOA-based sinusoidal RC oscillators”. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 71:155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lahiri A, Jaikla W, Siripruchyanun M (2011) Explicit-current-output second-order sinusoidal oscillators using two CFOA’s and grounded capacitors. Int J Electron Commun 65:669–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bhaskar DR, Gupta SS, Senani R, Singh AK (2012) New CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillators retaining independent control of oscillation frequency even under the influence of parasitic impedances. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 73:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nay KW, Budak A (1983) A voltage-controlled-resistance with wide dynamic range and low distortion. IEEE Trans Circ Syst 30:770–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Senani R, Bhaskar DR, Tripathi MP (1993) On the realization of linear sinusoidal VCOs. Int J Electron 74:770–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Senani R, Bhaskar DR (1996) New active-R sinusoidal VCOs with linear tuning laws. Int J Electron 80:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bhaskar DR, Tripathi MP (2000) Realization of novel linear sinusoidal VCOs. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 24:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bhaskar DR, Senani R, Singh AK (2010) Linear sinusoidal VCOs: new configurations using current feedback op-amps. Int J Electron 97:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bhaskar DR, Senani R, Singh AK, Gupta SS (2010) Two simple analog multiplier based linear VCOs using a single current feedback op-amp. Circ Syst 1:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Martinez PA, Sabadell J, Aldea C, Celma S (1999) Variable frequency sinusoidal oscillators based on CCII+. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 46:1386–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gupta SS, Senani R (2003) Realizations of current-mode SRCOs using all grounded passive elements. Frequenz 57:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Natarajan S (1989) Measurement of capacitances and their loss factors. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 38:1083–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ahmad W (1986) A new simple technique for capacitance measurement. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 35:640–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Awad SS (1988) Capacitance measurement based on operational amplifier circuit: error determination and reduction. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 37:379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Horng JW (2001) A sinusoidal oscillator using current-controlled current conveyors. Int J Electron 88:659–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fongsamut C, Anuntahirunrat K, Kumwachara K, Surakampontorn W (2006) Current-conveyor-based single-element-controlled and current-controlled sinusoidal oscillators. Int J Electron 93:467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Senani R, Gupta SS (2000) Novel SRCOs using first generation current conveyor. Int J Electron 87:1187–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kilinc S, Jain V, Aggarwal V, Cam U (2006) Catalogue of variable frequency and single resistance controlled oscillators employing a single differential- difference-complementary-current-conveyor. Frequenz 60:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Gupta SS, Senani R (2005) Grounded-capacitor SRCOs using a single differential- difference-complementary-current-feedback-amplifier. IEE Proc Circ Devices Syst 152:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gupta SS, Senani R (2006) New single resistance controlled oscillator configurations using unity-gain cells. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 46:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gupta SS, Sharma RK, Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2006) Synthesis of sinusoidal oscillators with explicit-current-output using current feedback op-amps. WSEAS Trans Electron 3:385–388

    Google Scholar 

  70. Moon G, Zaghloul ME, Newcomb RW (1990) An enhancement-mode MOS voltage-controlled linear resistor with large dynamic range. IEEE Trans Circ Syst 37:1284–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Elwan HO, Mahmoud SA, Soliman AM (1996) CMOS voltage-controlled floating resistor. Int J Electron 81:571–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Al-Shahrani SM (2007) CMOS wideband auto-tuning phase shifter circuit. Electron Lett 43:804–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gupta SS, Bhaskar DR, Senani R (2011) Synthesis of linear VCOs: the state-variable approach. J Circ Syst Comput 20:587–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gupta SS, Bhaskar DR, Senani R(2012) Synthesis of new single CFOA-based VCOs incorporating the voltage summing property of analog multipliers. ISRN Electron 2012: Article ID 463680 8pages

    Google Scholar 

  75. Mahmoud SA, Soliman AM (2000) Novel MOS-C oscillators using the current feedback op-amp. Int J Electron 87:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Singh V (1980) Novel sinusoidal oscillator employing grounded capacitors. Electron Lett 16:757–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Senani R, Bhaskar DR, Singh AK, Singh VK (2013) Current feedback operational amplifiers and their applications. Springer Science + Business Media, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  78. Gupta SS (2005) Realization of some class of linear/nonlinear analog electronic circuits using current-mode building blocks. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Technology, University of Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lahiri A, Jaikla W, Siripruchyanun M (2013) First CFOA-based explicit-current-output quadrature sinusoidal oscillators using grounded capacitors. Int J Electron 100:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Toker A, Ozcan S, Kuntman H, Cicekoglu O (2001) Supplementary all-pass sections with reduced number of passive elements using a single current conveyor. Int J Electron 88:969–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Zaher HA (1997) Oscillator uses feedback poles. Electron Eng 69:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  82. Srivastava DK, Singh VK, Senani R (2015) New very low frequency oscillator using only a single CFOA. Am J Electr Electron Eng 3:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Srivastava DK, Singh VK, Senani R (2015) Novel single-CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillator capable of absorbing all parasitic impedances. Am J Electr Electron Eng 3:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  84. Chen HP, Wang SF, Ku YT, Hsieh MY (2015) Quadrature oscillators using two CFOAs and four passive components. IEICE Electron Expr 12:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  85. Abuelma’atti MT, Khan MH (1996) Partially active-R grounded capacitor CFOA-based sinusoidal oscillators. Active Passive Electron Comp 19:105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Senani R (1994) On equivalent forms of single op-amp sinusoidal RC oscillators. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 41:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Abuelma’atti MT (2011) New two CFOA-based sinusoidal RC oscillators with buffered outlet. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 66:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Lahiri A, Gupta M (2011) Realizations of grounded negative capacitance using CFOAs. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 30:143–155

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Kasemsuwan V, Nakhlo W (2007) Simple ±0.75 volt rail-to-rail current feedback operational amplifier and its application for oscillator. Frequenz 61:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  90. Horng JW, Hou CL, Chang CM, Chung WY, Tang HW (2006) Current-mode multifunction filters and quadrature oscillator using unit gain cells. J Active Passive Electron Dev 1:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  91. Qadir A (2012) Current mode oscillator using current feedback amplifier. Int J Future Comput Commun 1:296–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Qahtani MA (2001) Active-only sinusoidal oscillator circuits. Active Passive Electron Comp 24:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Nandi R, Sanyal SK, Bandyopadhyay TK (2009) Single-CFA-based integrator, differentiator, filter, and sinusoidal oscillator. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 58:2557–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Koren V (2002) RF oscillator uses current-feedback op amp. EDN design-ideas: 83–84

    Google Scholar 

  95. Soliman AM (2000) Three oscillator families using the current feedback op amp. Frequenz 54:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Lidgey FJ, Hayatleh K (1997) Current-feedback operational amplifiers and applications. Electron Commun Eng J 9:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Abuelma’atti MT, Al-Ghazwani A (2000) New quartz crystal oscillators using the current-feedback operational amplifier. Active Passive Electron Comp 23:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Devices A (1990) Linear products data book. Analog Devices Inc., Norwood, MA

    Google Scholar 

  99. Rybin YK (2012) The nonlinear distortions in the oscillatory system of generator on CFOA. Active Passive Electron Comp, Article ID 908716:6pages

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix 1: Some Recent Contributions to CFOA-Based Oscillators

Appendix 1: Some Recent Contributions to CFOA-Based Oscillators

1.1 Quadrature Oscillators Using Two CFOAs and Four Passive Components

The Circuit 3 of Fig. 5.7 apart from employing two GCs also has the attractive feature of employing minimum number of total passive components namely, only two resistors and capacitors. However, very recently, Chen, Wang, Ku, and Hsieh [84] have presented two new circuits belonging to this class, which are shown in Fig. 5.44.

Fig. 5.44
figure 44

New CFOA-based quadrature oscillators proposed by Chen, Wang, Ku, and Hsieh [84]

Both of these circuits are characterized by the same CE which is given by

$$ {s}^2{C}_1{C}_2{R}_1{R}_2+s{C}_2\left({R}_1-{R}_2\right)+1=0 $$
(5.98)

so that the CO and FO are given by

$$ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}:{R}_1={R}_2\ \mathrm{and}\ \mathrm{F}\mathrm{O}:{\omega}_0=\sqrt{\frac{1}{C_1C{}_2R_1{R}_2}} $$
(5.99)

Hence, CO can be adjusted by R 1or R 2, whereas FO can be adjusted by C 1 or C 2. Furthermore, analysis reveals that the two outputs V 01 and V 02 are related by

$$ \frac{V_{01}(s)}{V_{02}(s)}=-\frac{1}{s{C}_2{R}_1} $$
(5.100)

Hence V 01 and V 02 are 90° apart in phase and hence, both the circuits are quadrature oscillators.

Using a CMOS CFOA biased with ±0.9 V, the circuits have been simulated in SPICE [84] with component values C 1 = C 2 = 3 pF, R 2 = 35 kΩ and R 1 adjusted 34.5 kΩ. In the CMOS CFOA, TSMC 0.18 CMOS process parameters were utilized. It was found that the oscillation frequency obtained from simulation f 0 = 1.52 MHz was quite close to the theoretical frequency 1.527 MHz.

1.2 New VLF Oscillators Using a Single CFOA

In the context of CFOA-based oscillators suitable for VLF generation for which circuit 1 of Fig. 5.7 appears to be suitable candidate, it is interesting to point out a circuit recently presented by Srivastava, Singh, and Senani [82] which is shown here in Fig. 5.45. This circuit, in addition to single-resistance-control of FO, also provides single resistance-control of CO but at the cost of one more capacitor but using only a single CFOA in contrast to the circuit 1 of Fig. 5.7. The CO and FO are found to be

Fig. 5.45
figure 45

VLF oscillator recently proposed by Srivastava, Singh, and Senani [82]

$$ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}:\frac{C_4-{C}_0}{C_3}=\frac{R_1}{R_0}+\frac{R_1}{R_2}\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em \mathrm{F}\mathrm{O}:{\omega}_0=\sqrt{\frac{\left(\frac{R_4}{R_0}-1\right)}{C_0C{}_3R_1{R}_4}} $$
(5.101)

From the above equation, it can be seen that FO can be adjusted by varying R4 while ensuring (R 4/R 1) > 1, whereas the CO can also be independently adjusted by C 4 and/or R 2. From the expressions of the oscillation frequency (FO), it may be seen that keeping the difference term in the numerator of FO as small as possible, generation of VLF oscillations should be possible. Experimental results using AD844 have demonstrated that it has been possible to generate sinusoidal waveforms of frequency as low as 2 Hz.

1.3 Single CFOA-Based Oscillator Capable of Absorbing all Parasitic Impedances

Most of the investigations on CFOA oscillators have focused attention only on canonic realizations thereby it has been largely ignored that some noncanonic circuits may also possess some interesting features which may not be possible from the canonic realization. Recently, Srivastava, Singh, and Senani [83] presented a single CFOA noncanonic oscillator which is shown in Fig. 5.46, which has the interesting property that it can absorb all the parasitic impedances of the CFOA in the various external passive components employed. Analysis shows that CO and FO of this circuit are expressed as

Fig. 5.46
figure 46

CFOA-based oscillator capable of absorbing all parasitic impedances proposed by Srivastava, Singh, and Senani [83]

$$ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}:\frac{C_0}{R_3}+\frac{C_1+{C}_3}{R_0}=\frac{C_1}{R_4}\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em \mathrm{F}\mathrm{O}:{\omega}_0=\sqrt{\frac{1}{R_0R{}_3C_0\left({C}_1+{C}_3\right)}} $$
(5.102)

Although this circuit does not provide control of FO, nevertheless the circuit can be adjusted to produce the oscillations by varying the resistor R 4 which does not feature in FO. Experimental results have shown that the error between the practically observed values of the oscillation frequencies and those calculated from the nonideal formula are indeed extremely small when theoretical values are determined by incorporating all parasitic impedances into external circuit elements [83].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Senani, R., Bhaskar, D.R., Singh, V.K., Sharma, R.K. (2016). Realization of Sinusoidal Oscillators Using Current Feedback Op-Amps. In: Sinusoidal Oscillators and Waveform Generators using Modern Electronic Circuit Building Blocks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23712-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23712-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23711-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23712-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics