Skip to main content
  • 753 Accesses

Abstract

Cytogenetics refers to studying chromosomes in individual cells and their relationship to human disease. Abnormal cytogenetic findings can be found in the number and structure of the chromosomes, such as amplification, deletions, translocations, inversions, duplications, or isochromosomes. Conventional cytogenetic studies allow complete karyotype analysis using chromosome-banding techniques and detect most chromosome anomalies; however, it is a cumbersome and time-consuming procedure requiring adequate fresh tissue and special cell culture techniques in order to obtain an adequate number of proliferating cells. FISH, using fluorescently labeled probes, is currently more often used than conventional cytogenetic analysis because it is a relatively easy and fast technique to detect well-documented specific chromosomal abnormalities and allows the localization of specific genes and DNA segments on specific chromosomes and may detect some abnormalities (e.g., microdeletions or duplications) that cannot be identified by conventional banding methods. FISH is particularly advantageous for FNA specimens because it can be tested on nondividing cells (so-called “interphase FISH”) and only requires small number of cells. The drawback of FISH technique is that it requires knowledge of the specific loci involved in an aberration and is not informative to identify “unexpected” chromosome abnormalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Readings

  1. Beatty BG, Bryant R, Wang W, Ashikaga T, Gibson PC, Leiman G, Weaver DL. HER-2/neu detection in fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer: fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:246–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caraway NP, Gu J, Lin P, Romaguera JE, Glassman A, Katz R. The utility of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens. Cancer. 2005;105:110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong Y. Ancillary studies on neoplastic cytologic specimens. In: Nayar R, editor. Cytology in oncology. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gong Y, Booser DJ, Sneige N. Comparison of HER-2 status determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in primary and metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:1763–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong Y, Caraway N, Gu J, Zaidi T, Fernandez R, Sun X, Huh YO, Katz RL. Evaluation of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for the t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation in the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma on fine-needle aspirates: a comparison with flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Cancer. 2003;99:385–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klijanienko J, Pierron G, Sastre-Garau X, Theocharis S. Value of combined cytology and molecular information in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:141–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore JG, To V, Patel SJ, Sneige N. HER-2/neu gene amplification in breast imprint cytology analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization: direct comparison with companion tissue sections. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23:299–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okabe M, Miyabe S, Nagatsuka H, Terada A, Hanai N, Yokoi M, Shimozato K, Eimoto T, Nakamura S, Nagai N, Hasegawa Y, Inagaki H. MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript defines a favorable subset of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3902–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seethala RR, Dacic S, Cieply K, Kelly LM, Nikiforova MN. A reappraisal of the MECT1/MAML2 translocation in salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:1106–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skalova A, Vanecek T, Sima R, Laco J, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, Starek I, Geierova M, Simpson RH, Passador-Santos F, Ryska A, Leivo I, Kinkor Z, Michal M. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:599–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, Tan DS, Felip E, Chow LQ, Camidge DR, Vansteenkiste J, Sharma S, De Pas T, Riely GJ, Solomon BJ, Wolf J, Thomas M, Schuler M, Liu G, Santoro A, Lau YY, Goldwasser M, Boral AL, Engelman JA. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1189–97.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang S, Gong Y. From cytomorphology to molecular pathology: maximizing the value of cytology of lymphoproliferative disorders and soft tissue tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:454–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Gong .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gong, Y. (2016). Cytogenetic Studies. In: Metastatic Neoplasms in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23621-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23621-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23620-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23621-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics