Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of European Examples of Freight Electric Vehicles Schemes—A Systematic Case Study Approach with Examples from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics in Logistics

Abstract

E-Mobility is a hot topic, in the public policy area as well as in business and scientific communities. Literature on electric freight transport is still relatively scarce. Urban freight transport is considered as one of the most promising fields of application of vehicle electrification, and there are on-going demonstration projects. This paper will discuss case study examples of electric freight vehicle initiatives in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK and identify enablers and barriers for common trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    colognE-mobil; DHL Germany; Meyer&Meyer Germany; United Parcel Service Germany.

  2. 2.

    colognE-mobil.

  3. 3.

    Effenberger Bakery.

  4. 4.

    Joeys Pizza service and City Express Hamburg, Tesco and Sainsbury’s London.

  5. 5.

    Cargohopper, the Netherlands.

  6. 6.

    DHL recorded an increased energy demand in winter of 30–60 %.

  7. 7.

    UPS Germany (conversion of 15 year old UPS truck); DHL (Iveco E-daily); Hermes (Mercedes Vito E-cell); Joeys Pizzy (eScooters);Nappy every after (Bradshaw EV).

  8. 8.

    UPS: Modec, In the Netherlands it was felt that the vehicles were sensitive to failures, in particular converted vehicles.

  9. 9.

    The costs for service and maintenance are 20–30 % lower than for conventional vehicles, (DHL Germany). Lower maintenance costs were also reported in the UK (Enterprise Mouchel, Sainsbury’s, UPS).

  10. 10.

    The TCO includes costs of investment for EV and charging infrastructure, costs for energy and other costs as vehicle tax, insurance, service and maintenance, repairs and environmental charges.

  11. 11.

    DPD (Nuremberg, Germany), Cargohopper (Utrecht, the Netherlands), Stadsleveransen (Gothenburgh).

  12. 12.

    Gnewt Cargo Ltd, Sainsbury’s, Brewers, Speedy Hire Melrose and Morgan.

  13. 13.

    Effenberger bakery, City Express Logistik, Meyer and Meyer, Joeys Pizza delivery.

  14. 14.

    Techniche Unie.

  15. 15.

    DHL, UPS.

  16. 16.

    TRE-FOR A/S and the Danish Energy Agency.

  17. 17.

    Melrose and Morgan, Gnewt Cargo ltd.

  18. 18.

    In Sweden, the market for urban freight transport does not express a need for ITC solutions.

  19. 19.

    Delta Stadsdistributie (Netherlands).

  20. 20.

    DHL and City Express Logistik (Germany).

  21. 21.

    DHL, UPS, Meyer&Meyer, City Express Logistik (Germany).

  22. 22.

    “My job did become more communicative. I talk to customers and pedestrians during the day a lot, their feedback is overwhelmingly positive. At the end of the day I feel affirmed instead of stressed: usually an express driver does receive mostly negative reactions during the day, for example because of a slow delivery, due to the traffic congestion, or when parking in the second row and hindering the traffic” (City Express Logistik).

  23. 23.

    City Express Logistik (Germany), Nappy ever after (UK).

  24. 24.

    DHL.

  25. 25.

    Sainsbury’s.

References

  • AEA/Ricardo (2011) Reduction and Testing of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions from Heavy Duty Vehicles—Lot 1: Strategy. AEA, Oxfordshire Available under http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/docs/ec_hdv_ghg_strategy_en.pdf. Las accessed on Sept. 28th 2015

  • Binsbergen AJ, Konings R, Tavasszy L, van Duin R (2013) Mega-projects in intermodal freight transport: innovation adoption. In: Priemus H, van Wee B (eds) International handbook on mega-projects. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 488

    Google Scholar 

  • Cars 21 (2013) Germany’s Deutsche post DHL to go green with 141 electric delivery vehicles. 28/06/2013. Inside EV

    Google Scholar 

  • Element Energy (2012) Ultra low emissions van study. Final report, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007) Green paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobility. Brussels, COM

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Road transport: Reducing CO2 emissions from vehicles. Available under http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/index_en.htm. Last accessed on Sept. 28th 2015

  • EV20, the Climate Group, Cenex, Energy Savings Trust (2012) Plugged-in fleets. A Guide to deploying electric vehicles in fleets. EV20, London

    Google Scholar 

  • FREVUE (2013) MEP vote not to reduce CO2 emission of vans. Available at http://frevue.eu/mep-vote-not-to-reduce-co2-emission-of-vans/

  • Jacobsson S (2013) WP 7.5 analysis of user needs for ICT solutions assisting the driver. Gothenburg, Lindholmen Science Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönewolf W (2011) E-City-Logistik, Status-Seminar Elektromobilität Berlin Brandenburg, Berlin, 25 Oct 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Antwerp, University of Aegean, University of Genova, University of Delft, CNRS, LCA Europe (2012) Innovation process in surface transport (INNOSUTRA), EU FP7-project, http://www.innosutra.eu/

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This manuscript is based on the findings of the Workpackage 7.3 of the EU INTERREG IVB project “E-Mobility NSR”. The full project report is available under http://e-mobility-nsr.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/info-pool/E-Mobility_-_Final_report_7.3.pdf.  

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tessa T. Taefi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taefi, T.T. et al. (2016). Comparative Analysis of European Examples of Freight Electric Vehicles Schemes—A Systematic Case Study Approach with Examples from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. In: Kotzab, H., Pannek, J., Thoben, KD. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23512-7_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23512-7_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23511-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23512-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics