Skip to main content

Applying Design of Experiments Methodology to PEI Toxicity Assay on Neural Progenitor Cells

  • Chapter

Abstract

Design of Experiments (DoE) statistical methodology permits the simultaneous evaluation of the effects of different factors on experimental performance and the analysis of their interactions in order to identify their optimal combinations. Compared to classical approaches based on changing only one factor at a time (OFAT), DoE facilitates the exploration of a broader range of parameters combinations, as well as providing the possibility to select a limited number of combinations covering the whole frame. The advantage of DoE is to maximise the amount of information provided and to save both time and money. DoE has been primarily used in industry to maximise process robustness, but recently it has also been applied in biomedical research to different types of multivariable analyses, from determination of the best cell media composition to the optimisation of entire multi-step laboratory protocols such as cell transfection.

Our case study is the optimisation of a transfection protocol for neural progenitor cell lines. These cells are very hard to transfect and are refractory to lipidic reagents, so we decided to set-up a protocol based on the non-lipidic Poliethylenimine (PEI) reagent. However, the effect of PEI toxicity on cells has to be correctly evaluated in the experimental design, since it can affect output computation. For this reason, we decided to apply DoE methodology to investigate the effect of PEI, both concentration and type, on cell viability and its interaction with other factors, such as DNA and cell density. The statistics-based DoE approach allowed us to express analytically the neural cell viability dependence on PEI amount/cell and efficiently identify the dose levels of PEI suitable for transfection experiments.

The authors “Sara Mancinelli”, “Valeria Zazzu” and “Andrea Turcato” contributed equally to this work.

The authors “Antonella Lanati” and “Giovanna L. Liguori” share senior co-authorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abramoff, M.D., Magalhaes, P.J., Ram, S.J.: Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton. Int. 11, 36–42 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alimperti, S., Lei, P., Wen, Y., Tian, J., Campbell, A.M.: Serum-free spheroid suspension culture maintains mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation potential. Biotechnol. Prog. 30, 974–983 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P.J.: DOE Simplified. Practical tools for effective experimentation. Productivity Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bezerra, M.A., Santelli, R.E., Oliveira, E.P., Villar, L.S., Escaleira, L.A.: Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76, 965–977 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bollin, F., Dechavanne, V., Chevalet, L.: Design of experiment in CHO and HEK transient transfection condition optimization. Protein Expr. Purif. 78, 61–68 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bongiovanni, A., Colotti, G., Liguori, G.L., Di Carlo, M., Digilio, F.A., Lacerra, G., Mascia, A., Cirafici, A.M., Barra, A., Lanati, A., Kisslinger, A.: Applying quality principles and project management methodologies in biomedical research: a public research network’s case study. Accred. Qual. Assur. 20, 203–213 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y., Bloemen, V., Impens, S., Moesen, M., Luyten, F.P., Schrooten, J.: Characterization and optimization of cell seeding in scaffolds by factorial design: quality by design approach for skeletal tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 17, 1211–1221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colucci-D’Amato, G.L., Tino, A., Pernas-Alonso, R., ffrench-Mullen, J.M., di Porzio, U.: Neuronal and glial properties coexist in a novel mouse CNS immortalized cell line. Exp. Cell Res. 252, 383–391 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalby, B., Cates, S., Harris, A., Ohki, E.C., Tilkins, M.L., Price, P.J., Ciccarone V.C.: Advanced transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent: primary neurons, siRNA, and high-throughput applications. Methods. 33, 95–103 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dhas, E.R., Dhas, J.H.: A review on optimization of welding process. Procedia Eng. 38, 544–554 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dirion, B., Cobb, Z., Schillinger, E., Andersson, L.I., Sellergren, B.: Water-compatible molecularly imprinted polymers obtained via high-throughput synthesis and experimental design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15101–15109 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Enochson, L., Brittberg, M., Lindahl, A.: Optimization of a chondrogenic medium through the use of factorial design of experiments. Biores Open Access 1, 306–313 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fei, N.C., Mehat, N.M., Kamaruddin, S.: Practical applications of Taguchi method for optimization of processing parameters for plastic injection moulding: a retrospective review. ISRN Ind. Eng. 2013, 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Florea, B.I., Meaney, C., Junginger, H.E., Borchard, G.: Transfection efficiency and toxicity of polyethylenimine in differentiated Calu-3 and nondifferentiated COS-1 cell cultures. AAPS PharmSci. 4, E12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gacula, M.C.: The design of experiments for shelf life study. J. Food Sci. 40, 399–403 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Green, S., Liu, P.Y., O'Sullivan, J.: Factorial design considerations. JCO 16, 3424--3430 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hibbert, D.B.: Experimental design in chromatography: a tutorial review. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 910, 2–13 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hubert, C., Lebrun, P., Houari, S., Ziemons, E., Rozet, E., Hubert, P.: Improvement of a stability-indicating method by Quality-by-Design versus Quality-by-Testing: a case of a learning process. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 88, 401–409 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, C.Y., Uludağ, H.: A simple and rapid nonviral approach to efficiently transfect primary tissue–derived cells using polyethylenimine. Nat. Protoc. 7, 935–945 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karra, D., Dahm, R.: Transfection techniques for neuronal cells. J. Neurosci. 30, 6171–6177 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knöspel, F., Schindler, R.K., Lübberstedt, M., Petzolt, S., Gerlach, J.C., Zeilinger, K.: Optimization of a serum-free culture medium for mouse embryonic stem cells using design of experiments (DoE) methodology. Cytotechnology 62, 557–571 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ilzarbe, J., Alvarez, M.J., Viles, E., Tanco, M.: Practical applications of design of experiments in the field of engineering: a bibliographical review. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 24, 417–428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jakobsen, R.B., Østrup, E., Zhang, X., Mikkelsen, T.S., Brinchmann, J.E.: Analysis of the effects of five factors relevant to in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells using factorial design and high throughput mRNA-profiling. PLoS One 9, e96615 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, G., Kawaguchi, H., Ogasawara, T., Asawa, Y., Kishimoto, J., Takahashi, T., Chung, U.I., Yamaoka, H., Asato, H., Nakamura, K., Takato, T., Hoshi, K.: Optimal combination of soluble factors for tissue engineering of permanent cartilage from cultured human chondrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 20407–20415 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandenius, C.F., Brundin, A.: Biocatalists and bioreactor design—bioprocess optimization using design-of-experiments methodology. Biotechnol. Prog. 24, 1191–1203 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weissman, S.A., Anderson, N.G.: Design of Experiments (DoE) and Process Optimization. A Review of Recent Publications. Organic Process Research & Development. ACS Publications (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wightman, L., Kircheis, R., Rössler, V., Carotta, S., Ruzicka, R., Kursa, M., Wagner, E.: Different behavior of branched and linear polyethylenimine for gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. J. Gene Med. 3(4), 362–372 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng, H., Clausen, M.R., Dalsgaard, T.K., Mortensen, G., Bertram, H.C.: Time-saving design of experiment protocol for optimization of LC-MS data processing in metabolomic approaches. Anal. Chem. 85, 7109–7116 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Umberto di Porzio and Giancarlo Bellenchi (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics ‘Adriano Buzzati-Traverso’) for helpful suggestions and for providing us with the mes-c-myc A1 cells, Salvatore Pulcrano and Valerio Piscopo (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics ‘Adriano Buzzati-Traverso’) for providing A1 cell culturing protocols, Genesia Manganelli and Emilia Giorgio (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics ‘Adriano Buzzati-Traverso’) for helping set up the preliminary assays, and Teresa Nutile (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics ‘Adriano Buzzati-Traverso’) for her statistical support. Portions of information contained in this work are printed with permission of Minitab Inc. All such material remains the exclusive property and copyright of Minitab Inc. All rights reserved. We also thank Richard E. Burket for editing and English revision.

This work was supported by grants from the Ministero dell’Economia (Ministry of Economics and Finance in Italy, CNR FaReBio di Qualità, qPMO Project), the Ministero Istruzione Università Ricerca (Medical Research in Italy RBNE08LN4P_002) and ‘Fondazione con il Sud’ (2011-PDR-13) to G.L.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna L. Liguori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mancinelli, S. et al. (2015). Applying Design of Experiments Methodology to PEI Toxicity Assay on Neural Progenitor Cells. In: Zazzu, V., Ferraro, M., Guarracino, M. (eds) Mathematical Models in Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23497-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics