Advertisement

Knowledge Sharing in Health Innovation Projects: Experiential Learning from Collaborating in a Project-Based Working Group Focusing in Knowledge Transfer in Maternity Services Best Practice (COST Projects IS 0907)

  • Kleopatra AlamantariotouEmail author
  • Katerina Nicolopoulou
Chapter
Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 20)

Abstract

Project work in today’s organisations primarily takes place through the engagement of knowledge-based communities of practice as well as the use of embedded communication technologies, such as web-based social media. This has been highlighted as one of the ways in which health innovation research knowledge can be managed and transferred (Towards knowledge management based on harnessing collective intelligence on the web, Berlin, 350–357, 2006; Collective intelligence in healthcare, http://www.oakleigh.co.uk/page/1428/White-Papers/Whitepaper-Articles/Collective-Intelligence-in-Healthcare, 2013). Organisations are witnessing a re-shaping of their processes in terms of diminished face-to-face interactions. This chapter reviews ways in which the use of communication technologies, social media and virtual teams assist project-based work in the transfer of health innovation knowledge. The focus is on experiential learning from collaboration from the European COST Project IS 0907.

Keywords

Knowledge sharing Knowledge transfer Innovation Maternity health care 

References

  1. 1.
    Nonaka I, Toyama R, Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Ind Corp Change 9(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gulati R, Nohria N, Zahir A (2000) Guest editors’ introduction to special issue: strategic networks. Strat Manage J 21(3):199–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Acad Manage Rev 30(1):146–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pauleen D (2004) Virtual teams: projects, protocols and processes. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scarlat E, Maries I (2010) Simulating collective intelligence of communities of practice using agent based methods. In: Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications, vol 6070, Lectures notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordeyeva I (2010) Enterprise 2.0: theoretical foundations of social media tools and influence on knowledge sharing in organisations. Master, Department of Business Information Technology, School of Management and Governance, University of Twente, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S, Taha Z (2009) Virtual teams: a literature review. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(3):2653–2669Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lipnack J, Stamps J (1997) Virtual teams: reaching across space, time, and organisations with technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. 1st Doubleday Books, New York. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11891451_31. Accessed Apr 2014
  10. 10.
    Alamantariotou K, Lazakidou A, Topalidou A, Kontosorou G, Tsouri M, Michel-Schuldt M, Samantzis C (2014) Collective intelligence for knowledge building and research in communities of practice and virtual learning environments. A project experience. Int J Health Res Innov 2(1):51–64Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jarmon L, Traphagan T, Mayrath M, Trivedi A (2009) Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: an interdisciplinary communication course in second life. Comput Educ 53(1):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barab SA, Thomas M, Dodge T, Carteaux R, Tuzun H (2005) Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educ Technol Res Dev 53(1):86–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alshoro M (2008) Knowledge sharing in virtual teams: the impact on trust, collaboration, and team effectiveness. University of Colorado. https://archive.org/details/knowledge_sharing_virtual_team. Accessed June 2014
  14. 14.
    Oakleigh (2013) Collective intelligence in healthcare. http://www.oakleigh.co.uk/page/1428/White-Papers/Whitepaper-Articles/Collective-Intelligence-in-Healthcare. Accessed Feb 2014
  15. 15.
    Zettsu K, Kiyoki Y (2006) Towards knowledge management based on harnessing collective intelligence on the web, vol 4248, Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 350–357Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norman C, Huerta T (2006) Knowledge transfer and exchange through social networks: building foundations for a community of practices within tobacco control. Implement Sci 1:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nicolini D, Powell J, Conville P, Martinez-Solano L (2008) Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector: a review. Int J Manage Rev 10(3):245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gabbay J, Le May A et al (2004) A case study of knowledge management in multiagency consumer-informed communities of practice: implications for evidence-based policy development in health and social sciences. Health 7(3):283–310Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooke J (2005) A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract 6(44):1–11Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Galunic C, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strat Manage J 19:1193–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goh S (2002) Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications”. J Knowl Manage 6(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muthusamy SK, White MA (2005) Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: a social exchange view. Organ Stud 26(3):415–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paavola S, Lipponen L, Hakkarainen K (2004) Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Rev Educ Res 74(4):557–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sutter B (2002) Instruction at heart: activity-theoretical studies of learning and development in coronary clinical work. Dissertation Series No. 1. Blekinge Institute of Technology, RonnebyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boud D, Middleton H (2003) Learning from others at work: communities of practice and informal learning. J Workplace Learn 15(5):194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wenger E, Snyder W (2000) Communities of practice: the organisational frontier. Harv Bus Rev 78(1):139–145Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kimble C, Hildreth P, Wright P (2001) Chapter XIII. Communities of practice: going virtual. In: Malhothra Y (ed) Knowledge management and business innovation. Idea Group, Hershey, pp 220–233Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Estabrooks C, Thompson D, Lovely J, Hofmeyer A (2006) A Guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crisp B, Swerissen H, Duckett S (2000) Four approaches to capacity building in health: consequences for measurement and accountability. Health Promot Int 15(2):99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kayes D, Kayes A, Yamazaki Y (2005) Essential competences for cross-cultural knowledge absorption. J Manage Psychol 20(7):578–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152, Special Issue: Technology, Organisations, and Innovation, MarchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chudoba KM, Wynn E, Lu M, Watson-Manheim MB (2005) How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organisation. Inf Syst J 15:279–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gassmann O, von Zedtwitz M (2003) Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Manage 33:243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alberta Health Services—Alberta Mental Health Board. Alberta Mental Health Research Partnership Program (2009) Knowledge translation: a synopsis of the literature 2008. Harrington A, Beverley L, Barron G, Pazderka H, Bergeman L, Cleiland S, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thissen MR, Jean MP, Madhavi CB, Toyia LA (2007) Communication tools for distributed software development teams. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: the global information technology workforce, ACM, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Blanchard Knowledge Network (2014) Achieving excellence, virtually was produced by Merry Lee Olson for The Ken BlanchardGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oborn E, Barett M, Racko G (2010) Knowledge translation in health care a review of the literature. Working paper series. Judge Business School CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gan Y, Zhu ZA (2007) Learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in virtual learning communities. Educ Technol Soc 10(1):206–226Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gardner H (1983) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM (2002) Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Andriessen E (2007) Less mobile, more virtual. Learning remote communication to save costs and the climate. White paper. Didactic materials for the Master Erasmus Mundus course on Psychology of Work Organization and Human Resources, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bejouleva M (2013) Understanding diverse cultures is imperative for building global virtual teams. New York University. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375207. Accessed Sept 2014
  46. 46.
    Nicolopoulou K, Kostomaj M, Campos A (2006) How to address group dynamics in virtual worlds. AI Soc 20(3):351–371. doi: 10.1007/s00146-005-0027-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arnheim R (1999) Gestalten and computers. Gestalt Theory 21(3):181–183Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    The Kenblanchard Companies (2014) Achieving excellence virtually white paper. http://www.kenblanchard.com/Leading-Research/Research/Achieving-Excellence,-Virtually. Accessed Sept 2014
  49. 49.
    Alavi M, Leidner D (1999) Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges and benefits. Commun AIS 1(2e)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gibson CB, Gibbs JL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm Sci Q 51(3):451–495Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hertel G, Geister S, Konradt U (2005) Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Hum Resour Manage Rev 15:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Honey P (1994) Teams and leaders: trainer’s guide. Melrose Film Productions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hunt JW, Hunt J (1979) Managing people at work: a manager’s guide to behaviour in organisations. Pan Books, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kleopatra Alamantariotou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katerina Nicolopoulou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations