Skip to main content

Are There Any Disadvantages of Hemodiafiltration?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hemodiafiltration

Abstract

Online postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been related to an improved patient survival as compared to HD, especially when high convection volumes are applied. Apart from this favorable result, however, online-HDF may evoke side effects that may counteract part of its benefits. Moreover, specific draw backs, related to the set up and maintenance phases of HDF treatment, may hinder the implementation of online HDF on a large scale. So, what are the disadvantages when performing HDF in every day clinical practice? From a medical perspective these may include safety concerns related to the large amounts of substitution fluids directly infused into the patients, the unintended removal of nutrients and other useful compounds including medication, and activation of blood cells. From a financial perspective additional costs may be of relevance. From a practical perspective the main downside of HDF is that starting up a HDF program needs extra efforts of the dialysis staff. In this chapter we discuss the above mentioned issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grooteman MP, van den Dorpel MA, Bots ML, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, Mazairac AH, et al. Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(6):1087–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Maduell F, Moreso F, Pons M, Ramos R, Mora-Macia J, Carreras J, et al. High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):487–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ok E, Asci G, Toz H, Ok ES, Kircelli F, Yilmaz M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular events in online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with high-flux dialysis: results from the Turkish OL-HDF Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(1):192–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mostovaya IM, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML, Covic A, Davenport A, Grooteman MP, et al. Clinical evidence on hemodiafiltration: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Semin Dial. 2014;27(2):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nistor I, Palmer SC, Craig JC, Saglimbene V, Vecchio M, Covic A, et al. Convective versus diffusive dialysis therapies for chronic kidney failure: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(6):954–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Susantitaphong P, Siribamrungwong M, Jaber BL. Convective therapies versus low-flux hemodialysis for chronic kidney failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(11):2859–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang AY, Ninomiya T, Al-Kahwa A, Perkovic V, Gallagher MP, Hawley C, et al. Effect of hemodiafiltration or hemofiltration compared with hemodialysis on mortality and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(6):968–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Penne EL, Visser L, van den Dorpel MA, van der Weerd NC, Mazairac AH, van Jaarsveld BC, et al. Microbiological quality and quality control of purified water and ultrapure dialysis fluids for online hemodiafiltration in routine clinical practice. Kidney Int. 2009;76(6):665–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Canaud B, Wizemann V, Pizzarelli F, Greenwood R, Schultze G, Weber C, et al. Cellular interleukin-1 receptor antagonist production in patients receiving on-line haemodiafiltration therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(11):2181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pizzarelli F, Maggiore Q. Clinical perspectives of on-line haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13 Suppl 5:34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaslaki LR, Berta K, Major L, Weber V, Weber C, Wojke R, et al. On-line hemodiafiltration does not induce inflammatory response in end-stage renal disease patients: results from a multicenter cross-over study. Artif Organs. 2005;29(5):406–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. den Hoedt CH, Bots ML, Grooteman MP, van der Weerd NC, Mazairac AH, Penne EL, et al. Online hemodiafiltration reduces systemic inflammation compared to low-flux hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2014;86(2):423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borrelli S, Minutolo R, De NL, Zamboli P, Iodice C, De PA, et al. Intradialytic changes of plasma amino acid levels: effect of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion versus acetate-free biofiltration. Blood Purif. 2010;30(3):166–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Combarnous F, Tetta C, Cellier CC, Wratten ML, De Custaud CT, et al. Albumin loss in on-line hemodiafiltration. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25(3):203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masakane I, Esashi S, Igarashi H. Biocompatibility of predilution on-line hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif. 2013;35 Suppl 1:34–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krieter DH, Hackl A, Rodriguez A, Chenine L, Moragues HL, Lemke HD, et al. Protein-bound uraemic toxin removal in haemodialysis and post-dilution haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(1):212–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fournier A, Birmele B, Francois M, Prat L, Halimi JM. Factors associated with albumin loss in post-dilution hemodiafiltration and nutritional consequences. Int J Artif Organs. 2015;38(2):76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vega A, Quiroga B, Abad S, Aragoncillo I, Arroyo D, Panizo N, et al. Albumin leakage in online hemodiafiltration, more convective transport, more losses? Ther Apher Dial. 2015;19(3):267–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beerenhout CH, Luik AJ, Jeuken-Mertens SG, Bekers O, Menheere P, Hover L, et al. Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(6):1155–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. den Hoedt CH, Bots ML, Grooteman MP, van der Weerd NC, Penne EL, Mazairac AH, et al. Clinical predictors of decline in nutritional parameters over time in ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(2):318–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cross J, Davenport A. Does online hemodiafiltration lead to reduction in trace elements and vitamins? Hemodial Int. 2011;15(4):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Lotsander A, Logan K, Dunge D, Odar-Cederlof I, Kallner A. Concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin B12 and folic acid in patients treated with hemodialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration or hemofiltration. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(1):74–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morena M, Cristol JP, Bosc JY, Tetta C, Forret G, Leger CL, et al. Convective and diffusive losses of vitamin C during haemodiafiltration session: a contributive factor to oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(3):422–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonzalez-Diez B, Cavia M, Torres G, Abaigar P, Camarero V, Muniz P. The effects of 1-year treatment with a haemodiafiltration with on-line regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) dialysis on biomarkers of oxidative stress in patients with chronic renal failure. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(1):629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Filiopoulos V, Hadjiyannakos D, Metaxaki P, Sideris V, Takouli L, Anogiati A, et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress in patients on hemodiafiltration. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(6):949–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grooteman MP, Gritters M, Wauters IM, Schalkwijk CG, Stam F, Twisk J, et al. Patient characteristics rather than the type of dialyser predict the variability of endothelial derived surface molecules in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(12):2751–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakurai K, Saito T, Yamauchi F, Asahi D, Hosoya H. Comparison of the effects of predilution and postdilution hemodiafiltration on neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets. J Artif Organs. 2013;16(3):316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gritters-van den Oever M, Grooteman MP, Bartels PC, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML, van den Dorpel MA, et al. Post-dilution haemodiafiltration and low-flux haemodialysis have dissimilar effects on platelets: a side study of CONTRAST. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(11):3461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazairac AH, Blankestijn PJ, Grooteman MP, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, den Hoedt CH, et al. The cost-utility of haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis in the Convective Transport Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(7):1865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lebourg L, Amato S, Toledano D, Petitclerc T, Creput C. Online hemodiafiltration: is it really more expensive? Nephrol Ther. 2013;9(4):209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takura T, Kawanishi H, Minakuchi J, Nagake Y, Takahashi S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of on-line hemodiafiltration in Japan. Blood Purif. 2013;35 Suppl 1:85–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tattersall JE, Ward RA. Online haemodiafiltration: definition, dose quantification and safety revisited. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(3):542–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blankestijn PJ. Has the time now come to more widely accept hemodiafiltration in the United States? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):332–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chapdelaine I, Mostovaya IM, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML, van den Dorpel MA, Levesque R, et al. Treatment policy rather than patient characteristics determines convection volume in online post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif. 2014;37(3):229–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Blankestijn MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blankestijn, P.J., Kooman, J.P. (2016). Are There Any Disadvantages of Hemodiafiltration?. In: Nubé, M., Grooteman, M., Blankestijn, P. (eds) Hemodiafiltration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23332-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23332-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23331-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23332-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics