Abstract
Although there is an increased interest in looking at psychotherapy in terms of discourse, narrative and dialogue, most psychotherapy research is still quantitative and psychotherapy research in the field of marital and family therapy (MFT) is rather scarce. While qualitative research (QR) is appreciated in the fields of sociology, pedagogy and anthropology, for instance, in the fields of clinical psychology and psychotherapy it has just started to be accepted as a valid kind of research.
This development towards the appreciation of qualitative research is important for our field as words and meanings—the area qualitative research is traditionally focussing on—are central to psychotherapy in general and to MFT in particular. This is the central question: how can we bring research closer to the complexity of MFT practice as a multi-actor setting?
The different contributors in this volume will each explain how they tried to answer this question by outlining their theoretical background, explaining their methodology and illustrating their approach by using it to study the therapy of Victoria and Alfonso. While the complexity of conceptual frames like the narrative perspective and Bakhtin’s philosophy has a good fit with the interactional complexity of the MFT setting as a co-constructive and responsive process between people, it is clear that it remains a challenge to use these (or other) conceptual frameworks in researching multi-actor settings.
Keywords
- Family Therapy
- Conversation Analysis
- Narrative Analysis
- Conceptual Frame
- Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Avdi, E. (2005). Negotiating a pathological identity in the clinical dialogue: Discourse analysis of a family therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 493–511.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Baxter, L. A. (2004). Dialogues of relating. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogues: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 107–124). London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Couture, S. J., & Sutherland, O. (2006). Giving advice on advice giving: A conversation analysis of Karl Tomm’s practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 329–344.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Wampold, B. E., & Hubble, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., & Marrs, A. L. (2000). Responding to blame in family therapy: A constructionist/narrative perspective. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 133–146.
Frosh, S., Burck, C., Strickland-Clark, L., & Morgan, K. (1996). Engaging with change: A process study of family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 141–161.
Gale, J., & Newfield, N. (1992). A conversation analysis of a solution focused marital therapy session. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 153–165.
Gale, J. E., Odell, M., & Nagireddy, C. S. (1995). Marital therapy and self-reflexive research: Research and/or intervention. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 105–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Goddard, A., Murray, C. D., & Simpson, J. (2008). Informed consent and psychotherapy: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of therapists’ views. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 81, 177–191.
Harré, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Pilkerton Cairnie, T., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19, 5–31.
Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hartzell, M., Seikkula, J., & von Knorring, A.-L. (2009). What children feel about their first encounter with Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31, 177–192.
Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. (Eds.). (1999). The heart and soul of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Karatza, H., & Avdi, E. (2011). Shifts in subjectivity during the therapy for psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84, 214–229.
Kogan, S. M. (1998). The politics of making meaning: Discourse analysis or a ‘postmodern’ interview. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 229–251.
Kurri, K., & Wahlström, J. (2005). Placement of responsibility and moral reasoning in couple therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 352–369.
Lambert, M. J. (2004). Introduction and historical overview. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 3–15). New York: Wiley.
Lambert, M. J. (2010). Yes, it is time for clinicians to routinely monitor treatment outcome. In B. L. Duncan, S. D. Miller, B. E. Wampold, & M. A. Hubble (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed., pp. 239–266). Washington, DC: APA.
Lambert, M. J. (2013a). Introduction and historical overview. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 3–20). New York: Wiley.
Lambert, M. J. (2013b). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). New York: Wiley.
Leiman, M. (2004). Dialogical sequence analysis. In H. Hermans & G. Dimaggio (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 255–270). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
McAdams, D. P. (1997). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Guilford.
McAdams, D. P., & Janis, L. (2004). Narrative identity and self-multiplicity. In L. E. Angus & J. McLeod (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory and research (pp. 159–173). London: Sage.
McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
McLeod, J. (2013). Qualitative research: Methods and contributions. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 49–84). New York: Wiley.
Olson, M., & Russell, C. (2004). Understanding change in conjoint psychotherapy: Inviting clients to comment upon the validity of standardized change scores. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 261–278.
Rober, P., Elliott, R., Buysse, A., Loots, G., & De Corte, K. (2008). What’s on the therapist’s mind? A grounded theory analysis of family therapist reflections during individual therapy sessions. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 48–57.
Rober, P., van Eesbeek, D., & Elliot, R. (2006). Talking about violence: A microanalysis of narrative processes in a family therapy session. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 313–328.
Roberts, J. (1996). Perceptions of the significant other of the effects of psychodynamic psychotherapy, implications for thinking about psycho-dynamic and systems approaches. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 87–93.
Salgado, J., Cunha, C., & Bento, T. (2013). Positioning microanalysis: Studying the self through the exploration of dialogical processes. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 325–335.
Sampson, J. (2013). The lived experience of family members of persons who compulsively hoard: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 388–402.
Sheridan, M., Peterson, B., & Rosen, K. (2010). The experiences of parents of adolescents in family therapy: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 144–157.
Singh, R. (2009). Constructing ‘the family’ across culture. Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 359–383.
Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Sprenkle, D. H., & Blow, A. J. (2004). Common factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 113–129.
Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
Sprenkle, D. H., & Piercy, F. P. (2005). Pluralism, diversity and sophistication in family therapy research. In D. H. Sprenkle & F. P. Piercy (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 3–18). New York: Guilford Press.
Sutherland, O., & Couture, S. (2007). The discursive performance of the alliance in family therapy: A conversation analytic perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 210–217.
Sutherland, O., & Strong, T. (2011). Therapeutic collaboration: A conversation analysis of constructionist therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 256–278.
Tseliou, E. (2013). A critical methodological review of discourse and conversation analysis studies of family therapy. Family Process, 52, 653–672.
Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wortham, A. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rober, P., Borcsa, M. (2016). The Challenge: Tailoring Qualitative Process Research Methods for the Study of Marital and Family Therapeutic Sessions. In: Borcsa, M., Rober, P. (eds) Research Perspectives in Couple Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23306-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23306-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23305-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23306-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)