Advertisement

An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Information Technology Integration in Healthcare Integrated Delivery Systems

  • Evelyn ThrasherEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 19)

Abstract

Healthcare alliance networks, also known as integrated delivery systems (IDSs), have developed rapidly in the US. Yet, research has not kept pace. This study examines two interrelated needs of healthcare alliance network research—the value of information technology (IT) integration for the IDS and the value of IT integration for the participating hospitals. Hypotheses are developed that relate IT integration to quality and performance outcomes at both the IDS level and at the hospital level. In addition, a taxonomy of hospitals is developed based on size; and the value of IDS IT integration is examined for each hospital quartile. The results of the study suggest that IT integration does indeed have a significant impact on performance in the healthcare industry. In addition, the results suggest that the performance improvements realized at the IDS level of analysis do not extend equally to all hospitals in the IDS.

Keywords

Electronic survey methods Empirical research Healthcare Healthcare integrated delivery systems Partial least squares 

References

  1. Al-Mashari M, Zairi M (2000) Creating a fit between BPR and IT infrastructure: a proposed framework for effective implementation. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 12(4):253–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter C, Hage J (1993) Organizations working together. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroudi JJ, Orlikowski WJ (1989) The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 13(1):87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inform Syst Res 6(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates DW (2002) The quality case for information technology in health care. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 2(7):1–9Google Scholar
  6. Beaudoin D, Bogaert M (2003) Measuring return on investment. HCT Project 119–122Google Scholar
  7. Boone B, Maley R (2000) Integrated health care delivery systems’ challenges. IRMI. http://www.irmi.com/expert/Articles/2000/Boone06.aspx. Accessed 23 July 2006
  8. Byrd TA, Turner DE (2000) Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. J Manage Inform Syst 17(1):167–208Google Scholar
  9. Byrd TA, Thrasher ET, Lang T, Davidson N (2005) A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5):448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin WW (2001) PLS Graph User’s Guide: Version 3.0. Soft Modeling, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Cohan J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrad DA, Shortell SM (1997) Integrated health systems: promise and performance. In: Conrad DA (ed) Integrated delivery systems: creation, management, and governance. Health Administration, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Deluca JM, Enmark R (2002) The CEO’s guide to health care information systems. Wiley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Devaraj JM, Kohli R (2000) Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. J Manage Inform Syst 16(4):41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowling WL (1997) Strategic alliances as a structure for integrated delivery systems. In: Conrad DA (ed) Integrated delivery systems: creation, management, and governance. Health Administration, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Enthoven AC, Tollen LA (2005) Competition in healthcare: it takes systems to pursue quality and efficiency. Health Affairs W5:420–433Google Scholar
  17. Etchen LL, Boulton JL (2000) Designing the IDS business portfolio. Healthcare Financial Management 29–33Google Scholar
  18. Friedman L, Goes J (2001) Why integrated health networks have failed. Front Health Serv Manage 17(4):3–28Google Scholar
  19. Friedman CP, Wyatt JC (1997) Evaluation methods in medical informatics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 16:91–109Google Scholar
  21. Hair JP Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton C, Jacob JM, Koch S, Quammen RL (2004) Automate best practices with electronic healthcare records. Nurs Manage 35(2):40E–40FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. HIMSS 15th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey (2004) http://www.himss.org/2004survey/ASP/healthcarecio_home.asp/. Accessed 1 Nov 2005
  24. Hinkin TR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J Manage 21(5):967–988Google Scholar
  25. Hsiao RL, Ormerod RJ (1998) A new perspective on the dynamics of information technology-enabled strategic change. Inform Syst J 8:21–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan B, Brennan PF, Dowling WL, Friedman CP, Peel V (2001) Toward an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8(3):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kilbridge PM (1998) The role of information systems in IDS-physician relationships. Healthc Financ Manage 52(6):31–34Google Scholar
  28. Killian RW (1999) Providers eye integration to improve care, lower costs. Manag Health 9(5):36–37Google Scholar
  29. Kim YK (2000) An impact of integrated delivery system on hospital financial and quality performance under managed care. Dissertation.Google Scholar
  30. Knoedler J (2003) IT integration transforms the care continuum. Nurs Manage 34:8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lapiedra R, Smithson S, Alegre J, Chiva R (2004) Role of information systems on the business network formation process: an empirical analysis of the automotive sector. J Enterp Inform Manag 17(3):219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laplante A (2005) Integrated systems improve medical care, control costs, according to Enthoven. Stanford Report, October 26, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  33. Lewis BR, Byrd TA (2003) Development of a measure for the information technology infrastructure construct. Eur J Inform Syst 12:93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28(2):283–322Google Scholar
  35. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Page S (2003) Virtual health care organizations and the challenges of improving quality. Health Care Manag Rev 28(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker VA, Charns MP, Young GJ (2001) Clinical service lines in integrated delivery systems: an initial framework and exploration. J Healthcare Manage 46(4):261–275Google Scholar
  38. Payton FC, Ginzberg MJ (2001) Inter organizational health care systems implementations: an exploratory study of early electronic commerce initiatives. Health Care Manage Rev 26(2):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rockart JF, Earl MJ, Ross JW (1996) Eight imperatives for the new IT organization. Sloan Manage Rev 38(1):43–55Google Scholar
  40. Rogers J, Lutz S (2003) Cost of caring: key drivers of growth in spending on hospital care. PricewaterhouseCoopers pp 1–19Google Scholar
  41. Rosow E, Grimes SL (2003) Technology’s implications for health care quality. Nurs Admin Quarterly 27(4):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sambamurthy V, Chin W (1994) The effects of group attitudes toward GDSS designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups. Decis Sci 25(2):215–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schumaker AM (2002) Inter organizational networks: using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks. J Health Hum Serv Adm 25:372–406Google Scholar
  44. Simoens S, Scott A (2005) Integrated primary care organizations: to what extent is integration occurring and why. Health Serv Manage Res 18(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skipper JB, Craighead CW, Byrd TA, Rainer RK (2008) Towards a theoretical foundation of supply network interdependence and technology-enabled coordination strategies. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith AE, Swinehart KD (2001) Integrated systems design for customer focused health care performance management: a strategic service unit approach. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 14(1):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snyder KD, Paulson P (2002) Healthcare information systems: analysis of healthcare software. Hosp Top 80(4):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Straub D, Rai A, Klein R (2004) Measuring firm performance at the network level: a nomology of the business impact of digital supply networks. J Manage Inform Syst 21(1):83–114Google Scholar
  49. Subramani MR (2004) How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationship? MIS Quarterly 28(1):45–73Google Scholar
  50. Tallon PP, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manage Inform Syst 16(4):145–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tapscott D, Caston A (1993) Paradigm shift: the new promise of information technology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ (1993) Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations: effects on resource utilization. J Am Med Assoc 269(3):379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Venkatraman N (1994) IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Manage Rev 35:73–87Google Scholar
  54. Waring T, Wainwright D (2000) Interpreting integration with respect to information systems in organizations—image, theory and reality. J Inform Technol 15:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weiner BJ, Savitz LA, Bernard S, Pucci LG (2004) How do integrated delivery systems adopt and implement clinical information systems. Health Care Manage Rev 29(1):51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Young DW, McCarthy SM (1999) Managing integrated delivery systems: a framework for action. Health Administration, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gordon Ford College of Business, Western Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations