Advertisement

Designing an Integrated Surgical Care Delivery System Using Axiomatic Design and Petri Net Modeling

  • Joshua Bosire
  • Shengyong WangEmail author
  • Mohammad Khasawneh
  • Tejas Gandhi
  • Krishnaswami Srihari
Chapter
Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 19)

Abstract

Over the last decade, a wide range of philosophies and management strategies have been embraced by an increasing number of healthcare organizations, with the principal goal of improving productivity and the quality of care while reducing the associated costs. These have had a significant impact on various healthcare services, including the delivery of surgical care. These philosophies and strategies are composed of scientific techniques and methods, a majority of which can be classified under the Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) field of study. For the most part, these techniques have proved to be instrumental in engineering radical changes and improvements in the ailing healthcare industry. This research seeks to contribute to the growing efforts on the application of ISE tools in the healthcare industry. First, an attempt is made to illustrate how various techniques can be used to engineer tangible benefits into the processes for surgical care delivery. Axiomatic Design (AD) concepts are leveraged to synthesize redesign changes, which are then applied to a conceptual model of the surgical system. The model is developed using a Petri Net (PN) technique and subsequently validated, verified and analyzed using PN heuristics and Dependency Structure Matrix (DSM). The outcomes of this redesign depict process improvements with the potential to enhance the quality of surgical care while enabling close to 70 % productivity gains. As a result, this research proposes a framework for the systematic redesign of processes, especially when changes need to be tested and verified before implementation. The techniques identified within this framework are ideal for the successful completion of the ‘design’ and ‘plan’ phases when pursuing operations management philosophies like Six-Sigma (SS) and Total Quality Management (TQM).

Keywords

Surgical system System redesign Axiomatic design Petri net Integrated care delivery 

References

  1. Browning T (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(3):292–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dexter F, Macario A, Traub R, Hopwood M, Lubarsky D (1999) An operating room scheduling strategy to maximize the use of operating room block time: computer simulation of patient scheduling and survey of patient’s preferences for surgical waiting. Anesth Analg 89:7–20Google Scholar
  3. Forman E, Gass S (2001) The analytic hierarchy process: an exposition. Oper Res 49(4):469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gerdsri N, Kocaoglu D (2007) Applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping. Math Comput Model 46:1071–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gido B (2000) Queuing models with admission and termination control: monotonicity and threshold results. Doctorial Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. Healthcare Financial Management Association (2003) Achieving operating room efficiency through process integration. Expert Paper. http://www.hfma.org. Accessed Aug 2010
  7. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Leymann F, Roller D, Schmidt M (2002) Web services and business process management. IBM Syst J 41(2):198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lusk S, Paley S, Spanyi A (2005) The evolution of business process management as a professional discipline. White Paper. http://www.bptrends.com. Accessed May 2010
  10. Miers D (2005) BPM: driving business performance. White Paper. http://www.bptrends.com. Accessed Oct 2010
  11. Montazar A, Behbahani S (2007) Development of an optimized irrigation system selection model using analytical hierarchy process. Biosyst Eng 98:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nivarthi S (2004) Enhancing the utilization of multiple suites of OR using a simulation based approach. Masters Thesis, State University of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Oddershede A, Arias A, Cancino H (2007) Rural development decision support using the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 46:1107–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pham D, Klinkert A (2008) Surgical case scheduling as a generalized job shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 185(3):1011–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ransom S, Joshi M, Nash D (2005) The healthcare quality book: vision, strategy and tools. Health Administration, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. René D, Hassane A (2005) Discrete, continuous, and hybrid petri nets. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw D, Holland P, Kawalek P, Snowdon B, Warboys B (2007) Elements of a business process management system. Bus Process Manag J 13(1):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith H, Fingar P (2003) Workflow is just a pi process. Computer Sciences Corporation. http://www.bpm3.com/picalclus. Accessed Aug 2010
  19. Su J, Chen S, Lin L (2003) A structured approach to measuring functional dependency and sequencing of coupled tasks in engineering design. Comput Ind Eng 45:195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suh P (1990) The principles of design. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. van der Aalst W (1998) The application of petri nets to workflow management. J Circuit Syst Comput 8(1):21–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van der Aalst W, Van Hee K (2002) Workflow management: models, methods and systems. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang K, El-Haik B (2003) Design for six sigma: a roadmap for product development. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. zur Muehlen M (2004) Workflow-based process controlling: foundation, design and application of workflow-driven process information systems. Logos, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Bosire
    • 1
  • Shengyong Wang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mohammad Khasawneh
    • 3
  • Tejas Gandhi
    • 4
  • Krishnaswami Srihari
    • 3
  1. 1.Cooper University HospitalCamdenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AkronAkronUSA
  3. 3.Department of Systems Science and Industrial EngineeringState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamtonUSA
  4. 4.Navicent HealthMaconUSA

Personalised recommendations