Towards Benchmarking Scene Background Initialization
Given a set of images of a scene taken at different times, the availability of an initial background model that describes the scene without foreground objects is the prerequisite for a wide range of applications, ranging from video surveillance to computational photography. Even though several methods have been proposed for scene background initialization, the lack of a common groundtruthed dataset and of a common set of metrics makes it difficult to compare their performance. To move first steps towards an easy and fair comparison of these methods, we assembled a dataset of sequences frequently adopted for background initialization, selected or created ground truths for quantitative evaluation through a selected suite of metrics, and compared results obtained by some existing methods, making all the material publicly available.
KeywordsBackground initialization Video analysis Video surveillance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Chen, C.C., Aggarwal, J.: An adaptive background model initialization algorithm with objects moving at different depths. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2008. ICIP 2008, pp. 2664–2667 (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.Maddalena, L., Petrosino, A.: The SOBS algorithm: what are the limits? In: Proc. CVPR Workshops, pp. 21–26, June 2012Google Scholar
- 6.Maddalena, L., Petrosino, A.: Background model initialization for static cameras. In: Bouwmans, T., Porikli, F., Hferlin, B., Vacavant, A. (eds.) Background Modeling and Foreground Detection for Video Surveillance, pp. 3-1-3-16. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2014)Google Scholar
- 10.Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E., Bovik, A.: Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Conference Record of the Thirty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1398–1402 (2003)Google Scholar
- 11.Yalman, Y., Erturk, I.: A new color image quality measure based on YUV transformation and PSNR for human vision system. Turkish J. of Electrical Eng. & Comput. Sci. 21, 603–612 (2013)Google Scholar