Advertisement

Performance Analysis of Active Shape Reconstruction of Fractured, Incomplete Skulls

  • Kun Zhang
  • Wee  Kheng LeowEmail author
  • Yuan Cheng
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9256)

Abstract

Reconstruction of normal skulls from deformed skulls is a very important but difficult task in practice. Active shape model (ASM) is among the most popular methods for reconstructing skulls. To apply ASM to skull reconstruction, it is necessary to establish shape correspondence among the training and testing samples because wrong correspondence will introduce unwanted shape variations in ASM reconstruction. Despite the popularity of ASM, the accuracy of ASM skull reconstruction has not been well investigated in existing literature. In particular, it is unclear how to estimate the reconstruction error of skulls without ground truth. This paper aims to investigate the source of error of ASM skull reconstruction. Comprehensive tests show that the error of accurate correspondence algorithm is uncorrelated and small compared to reconstruction error. On the other hand, ASM fitting error is highly correlated to reconstruction error, which allows us to estimate the reconstruction error of real deformed skulls using ASM fitting error. Moreover, ASM fitting error is correlated to the severity of skull defects, which places a limit on the reconstruction accuracy that can be achieved by ASM.

Keywords

Reconstruction Error Soft Constraint Active Shape Model Mesh Vertex Target Mesh 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baldock, E.R., Graham, J.: Image Processing and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benazzi, S., Stansfield, E., Milani, C., Gruppioni, G.: Geometric morphometric methods for three-dimensional virtual reconstruction of a fragmented cranium: The case of Angelo Poliziano. Int. Journal on Legal Medicine 123(4), 333–344 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennis, C.: Piecewise surface flattening for non-distorted texture mapping. Computer Graphics 25(4), 237–246 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berar, M., Desvignes, M., Bailly, G., Payan, Y.: 3D meshes registration : application to statistical skull model. In: Campilho, A.C., Kamel, M.S. (eds.) ICIAR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3212, pp. 100–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chui, H., Rangarajan, A.: A new algorithm for non-rigid point matching. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng, Q., Zhou, M., Shui, W., Wu, Z., Ji, Y., Bai, R.: A novel skull registration based on global and local deformations for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Science Int. 208, 95–102 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elena, D.M., Chapuis, J., Pappas, I., Ferrigno, G., Hallermann, W., Schramm, A., Caversaccio, M.: Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning. Int. J. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 35(7), 636–642 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Floater, M.S., Hormann, K.: Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. In: Advances in Multiresolution for Geometric Modelling, pp. 157–186 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gumprecht, H.K., Widenka, D.C., Lumenta, C.B.: BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: Technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. Neurosurgery 44(1) (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gunz, P.: Statistical and Geometric Reconstruction of Hominid Crania: Reconstructing Australopithecine Ontogeny. Universität Wien (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Bookstein, F., Weber, G.: Computer aided reconstruction of human crania. In: Proc. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holland, P.W., Welsch, R.E.: Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Comm. in Statistics: Theory and Methods 6(9), 813–827 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kotcheff, A.C.W., Taylor, C.J.: Automatic construction of eigenshapemodels by direct optimization. Medical Image Analysis 2(4), 303–314 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, M.Y., Chang, C.C., Lin, C.C., Lo, L.J., Chen, Y.R.: Medical rapid prototyping in custom implant design for craniofacial reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 2903–2908 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lüthi, M., Albrecht, T., Vetter, T.: Building shape models from lousy data. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5762, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, J.M., Liu, R., Tomasi, C.: Outlier robust ICP for minimizing fractional RMSD. In: Proc. Int. Conf. 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seo, H., Thalmann, N.M.: An automatic modeling of human bodies from sizing parameters. In: Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Souza, A., Udupa, J.K.: Automatic landmark selection for active shape models. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner, W.D., Brown, R.E., Kelliher, T.P., Tu, P.H., Taister, M.A., Miller, K.W.: A novel method of automated skull registration for forensic facial approximation. Forensic Science Int. 154, 149–158 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wei, L., Yu, W., Li, M., Li, X.: Skull assembly and completion using template-based surface matching. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zachow, S., Lamecker, H., Elsholtz, B., Stiller, M.: Reconstruction of mandibular dysplasia using a statistical 3D shape model. In: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 1238–1243 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, K., Cheng, Y., Leow, W.K.: Dense Correspondence of skull models by automatic detection of anatomical landmarks. In: Wilson, R., Hancock, E., Bors, A., Smith, W. (eds.) CAIP 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8047, pp. 229–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations